Cited by 217Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

The variability of the photoplethysmographic signal - a potential method for the evaluation of the autonomic nervous system

Nitzan, Meir, Babchenko, Anatoly, Khanokh, Boris, Landau, David·1998·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

The heart rate variability is composed of low- and high-frequency fluctuations, which are mediated by the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nervous systems. The baseline and the amplitude of the photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal also show fluctuations in the same frequencies. In the current study, PPG examinations were performed on the fingers of normal subjects and diabetic patients, and three parameters were derived from each PPG pulse: the baseline of the pulse, its amplitude and its period (which is equal to the heart period). The level of the variability of each PPG pulse parameter was measured by the ratio of the standard deviation of the parameter to its mean value. The level of the low-frequency fluctuations for the PPG amplitude and for the heart cycle period did not differ between males and females, but was lower for diabetic patients, indicating lower activity of the autonomic nervous system. The curves of the baseline and the amplitude of the PPG signal for the non-diabetic subjects showed high correlation between the left and the right hands. For most of the diabetic patients the right-left correlation coefficients were significantly lower than those for the non-diabetic subjects. Our initial results have shown that the variability of the PPG parameters shows promise for the assessment of the function of the autonomic nervous system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0967-3334/19/1/008

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitzan, M., Babchenko, A., Khanokh, B., & Landau, D.
Affiliations
  • Jerusalem College of Technology (IL)
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
93-102
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2069780950
Cited by
217
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
photoplethysmography, autonomic nervous system, heart rate variability, diabetes mellitus, sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, low-frequency fluctuations
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autonomic Nervous System, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review