Cited by 202RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Challenges in CRISPR/CAS9 delivery: potential roles of nonviral vectors

Li, Ling, He, Zhi-Yao, Wei, Xia-Wei, Gao, Guang-Ping, Wei, Yu-Quan·2015·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing platforms are widely applied as powerful tools in basic research and potential therapeutics for genome regulation. The appropriate alternative of delivery system is critical if genome editing systems are to be effectively performed in the targeted cells or organisms. To date, the in vivo delivery of the Cas9 system remains challenging. Both physical methods and viral vectors are adopted in the delivery of the Cas9-based gene editing platform. However, physical methods are more applicable for in vitro delivery, while viral vectors are generally concerned with safety issues, limited packing capacities, and so on. With the robust development of nonviral drug delivery systems, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers might be potent vectors for the delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 systems. In this review, we look back at the delivery approaches that have been used for the delivery of the Cas9 system and outline the recent development of nonviral vectors that might be potential carriers for the genome editing platform in the future. The efforts in optimizing cationic nanocarriers with structural modification are described and promising nonviral vectors under clinical investigations are highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.2015.069

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-viral vectors may offer advantages over viral vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, including low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation in delivering larger genetic payloads, and ease of large-scale production.

    “As an alternative, non-viral vectors may offer tantalizing possibility in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery with respect to their low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation in delivering larger genetic payloads and ease of large-scale production [73–75].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., He, Z.-Y., Wei, X.-W., Gao, G.-P., & Wei, Y.-Q.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Lab for Aging Research, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
  • Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
2015-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
452-462
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W1710257910
Cited by
202
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, non-viral vectors, genome editing, lipid nanoparticles, polymer-based nanocarriers, in vivo gene delivery, clinical gene therapy
MeSH terms
Genetic Vectors, Humans, Viruses, Genetic Therapy, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review