CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 650Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryValues and Moral Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 548 of the 548 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

19 The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture‐Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules

Haidt, Jonathan, Joseph, Craig·2008·The Innate Mind, Volume 3
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This chapter discusses how morality might be partially innate, meaning organized, to some extent, in advance of experience. It begins by arguing for a broader conception of morality and suggests that most of the discussion of innateness to date has not been about morality per se; it has been about whether the psychology of harm and fairness is innate. Five hypotheses about the origins of moral knowledge and value are considered, and one of them (a form of flexible and generative modularity) is endorsed as being the best candidate. The importance of narrativity in moral functioning is discussed. In some respects, this is another corrective to what is seen as an overemphasis on deductive and calculative conceptions of value and rationality among both philosophers and psychologists. It is shown that a narrative approach to morality fits well with the nativist ‘five foundations’ view developed in the first part of the chapter, and also helps to explain how the intuitive, evolved foundations of morality are elaborated by cultural activity into the complex, diverse moral functioning that mature human beings display.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019

Cites

548 of 548 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–400 of 548

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Baars,, 2003, How brain reveals mind: Neuroimaging supports the central role of conscious experience., Journal of Consciousness Studies
  2. Brown,, 1992, Left, Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung
  3. Brown,, 1993, Uphill, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
  4. Byrne,, 1995, Do rats ape?, Animal Behaviour
  5. Charlesworth,, 1992, Developmental Psychology
  6. Conrad,, 1964, Acoustic confusion in immediate memory., British Journal of Psychology
  7. Crusio,, 1990, Intelligent quantitative genetics: Asking the right questions., Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive
  8. Csibra,, 2007, Obsessed with goals, Becoming an Intentional Agent: The Development of Action Control, special issue of Acta Psychologica
  9. Csibra,, 1999, pure reason, Cognition
  10. Deprez,, 1993, Negation and functional projections in early child grammar., Linguistic Inquiry
  11. Draghi‐Lorenz,, 2001, nonbasic, Developmental Review
  12. Feigel,, 1962, Philosophical embarrassment of psychology., Psychologishe Beitrage
  13. Gleitman,, 1990, The structural sources of verb meanings., Language Acquisition, 10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Godfrey'Smith,, 2000, genetic coding, Philosophy of Science
  15. Gottfredson,, 2004, fundamental cause, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  16. Hastings,, 2000, Circadian clocks in the mammalian brain., BioEssays, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200001)22:1〈23::AID-BIES6〉3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  17. Hur,, 1998, Genetic and environmental influence on morningness‐eveningness., Personality and Individual Differences
  18. Johnson,, 2004, Intelligence
  19. Kosslyn,, 2001, NeuroReport
  20. Lee,, 2007, Intelligence
  21. Leekham,, 1991, metarepresentational, Cognition
  22. Leslie,, 2006, Theory of mind, Psychological Science
  23. Leslie,, 1998, What, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  24. Loehlin,, 2000, Stoolmiller on restriction of range in adoption studies: A comment., Behavior Genetics
  25. Lorenz,, 1950, The comparative method of studying innate behavior patterns., Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology
  26. Luna,, 1995, Entomologia Experimenalis et Applicata
  27. Mameli,, 2007, Biology and Philosophy
  28. Mameli,, 2006, Biology and Philosophy
  29. Matzel,, 2003, general, Journal of Neuroscience
  30. Meaney,, 2003, Nature, nurture, and the disunity of science., Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  31. Meltzoff,, 1997, Explaining facial imitation: Theoretical model., Early Development and Parenting, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4〈179::AID-EDP157〉3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  32. Myowa‐Yamakosi,, 2004, Developmental Science
  33. Nichols,, 1978, Twin studies of ability, personality and interests., Homo
  34. Orr,, 1999, An evolutionary dead end? Review of Schlichting, C. D. and Pigliucci, M., Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Science
  35. Özçaliwşkan,, 1999, Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish., BUCLD
  36. Paillard,, 1983, blind‐sight., Archives of Neurology
  37. Papafragou,, 2004, Review of Carston 2002., Lingua
  38. Prokopy,, 1993, Evolution in an orchard., Natural History
  39. Prokopy,, 1998, Oecologia
  40. Pruden,, 2004, Foundations of verb learning: Infants form categories of path and manner in motion events., BUCLD
  41. Pulverman,, 2003, Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Research Forum
  42. Rijsdijk,, 2002, Application of hierarchical genetic models to Raven and WAIS subtests: A Dutch twin study., Behavior Genetics
  43. Roeder,, 1961, The detection and evasion of bats by moths., American Scientist
  44. Sarkar,, 1996, coding, BioScience
  45. Saxe,, 2005, Five‐month‐old infants know that humans are solid, like inanimate objects., Cognition
  46. Skinner,, 1947, Superstition, Journal of Experimental Psychology
  47. Smetana,, 1990, Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly,
  48. Stoleru,, 2005, Nature
  49. Sulloway,, 1998, Darwinian Virtues., New York Review of Books
  50. Toh,, 2001, Science
  51. Tomasello,, 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  52. Trick,, 2005, Catch the Spies, Cognitive Development
  53. Turiel,, 1978, Social interactions and the development of social concepts in preschool children., Child Development
  54. Urbach,, 1974, IQ debate, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science
  55. van, 2004, Realized heritability and repeatability of risktaking behavior in relation to avian personalities., Proceedings of the Royal Society London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 650

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Innate Mind, Volume 3
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Published
2008-04-01
Pages
367-392
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019
OpenAlex
W2489929582
Semantic Scholar
efac3ee31af4428e2cd874102bc2c8a5a12c5a81
Cited by
650
References
548
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 40
FWCI
33.92
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
Keywords
moral psychology, modularity, moral values, fairness, narrativity, moral foundations, rationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review