The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,601–4,700 of 12,257
Kjaran, J. I., & Halldórsdóttir, B. E. (2021) · Young people and learning processes in school and everyday life · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75319-1_11 · Cited by 5
Testimonial injustice: considering caregivers in paediatric behavioural healthcare
Pham, M. T., Storch, E. A., & Lázaro‐Muñoz, G. (2021) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107937 · Cited by 3
Moral Responsibility for Implicit Bias and the Impact of Social Categorization
Sie, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679309.013.28 · Cited by 3
Critical Thinking and Epistemic Injustice in Education
Marabini, A. (2022) · Contemporary philosophies and theories in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95714-8_6 · Cited by 3
Narrative Identity and Recognition Deficiency
Racine, R. (2022) · The British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayac025 · Cited by 3
Lynch, R. E. (2015) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17960-5_8 · Cited by 3
Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315213217-39 · Cited by 4
Grigoroglou, M., & Anna Papafragou, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.18 · Cited by 3
Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn’t There in the Study of Science and Security
Rappert, B. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137493736_1 · Cited by 3
Virtanen, P. K. (2021) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004463097_010 · Cited by 3
Kang, N.-H. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83122-6_9 · Cited by 3
On Moral Unintelligibility: Beauvoir’s Genealogy of Morality in the Second Sex
Bremner, S. V. (2022) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onac015 · Cited by 3
Ethical Hotspots in Infectious Disease Surveillance for Global Health Security
Parker, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192871688.003.0014 · Cited by 3
Aliverti, A., Carvalho, H., Chamberlen, A., & Sozzo, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192899002.003.0020 · Cited by 3
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0016 · Cited by 3
Institutional Evils, Culpable Complicity, and Duties to Engage in Moral Repair
Peck, E., & Feder, E. K. (2017) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12238 · Cited by 3
Engel, P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7_4 · Cited by 3
Lauer, H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70226-1_12 · Cited by 3
The (Ir)Relevance of Science Fiction to Non-Binary and Genderqueer Readers
Šporčič, A. (2018) · ELOPE English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries · doi:10.4312/elope.15.1.51-67 · Cited by 3
Strong internalism, doxastic involuntarism, and the costs of compatibilism
Perrine, T. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1879-4 · Cited by 3
The value of giving autistic testimony a substantial role in the science of autism
Dinishak, J. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18002352 · Cited by 4
Werkheiser, I. (2020) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12354 · Cited by 3
African Language Resources for Knowledge Societies
Roux, J. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.012 · Cited by 3
Ibeka, V. (2021) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2021.1894914 · Cited by 3
Pouscoulous, N., & Dulcinati, G. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.19 · Cited by 3
McKenna, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888822.003.0002 · Cited by 3
Pluralism and the 'Problem of Reality' in the Later Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend
Kidd, I. J. (2010) · Durham e-Theses (Durham University) · Cited by 3
Experts in the Climate Change Debate
Almassi, B. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch10 · Cited by 3
Vakhshtayn, V. S., & VVizer, T. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2807018 · Cited by 3
Communication, Labor, and Communicative Labor
McKinney, R. (2015) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · Cited by 3
Phenomenology of illness, philosophy, and life
Kidd, I. J. (2017) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.02.005 · Cited by 3
Introduction: Philosophy of Sex and Gender in Gender Medicine
Amoretti, M. C., & Vassallo, N. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9510-8 · Cited by 3
Diep, L. (2017) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.11575/prism/24933 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Injustice in White Academic Feminism
Donnelly, M. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/12098397 · Cited by 3
(2018) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/aky002 · Cited by 3
Pratt, B., & Hyder, A. A. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1523503 · Cited by 3
Feeling as Knowing: Trans Phenomenology and Epistemic Justice
Aultman, B. L. (2018) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.33267.81448 · Cited by 3
Credibility Excess and Social Support Criterion
Beverley, J., & Reischer, H. N. (2019) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1665743 · Cited by 3
Patient Representation: Mind the Gap Between Individual and Collective Claims
Jongsma, K. R., & Schicktanz, S. (2020) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1730519 · Cited by 3
Commentary on: ‘Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults’
Lemma, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106587 · Cited by 3
Flechtner, S. (2021) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12498 · Cited by 3
Gaakeer, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_989-1 · Cited by 3
How Should We Promote Transient Diversity in Science?Preprint
O’Connor, C., & Wu, J. (2021) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/w3xc5 · Cited by 3
Sociocultural Attunement in Systemic Family Therapy
Knudson‐Martin, C., McDowell, T., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119438519.ch27 · Cited by 3
Philosophy for All Children: enhancing knowledge
Austin, A. (2020) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17147927.v1 · Cited by 3
Ray, M. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119635253.ch33 · Cited by 3
Socioculturally Attuned Family Therapy
McDowell, T., Knudson‐Martin, C., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_1093 · Cited by 3
van der Tuin, I. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss042 · Cited by 3
Francis, L. P. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_39 · Cited by 3
Coady, D. P. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch4 · Cited by 3
Narrative Equity in Genomic Screening at the Population Level
Garland‐Thomson, R., & Larson, S. A. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2207548 · Cited by 3
Pour une santé publique en faveur d’une justice épistémique
Fillol, A., Fonquerne, L., Cambon, L., & Ridde, V. (2023) · Global Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/17579759231183325 · Cited by 8
It Takes Two to Tango: Fostering Engagement Within Citizen Juries
Bogaert, B., & Jox, R. J. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2272916 · Cited by 3
Bolder Bioethics: Demanding a Gold Standard in REDI Recommendations
Bandara, K., Johal, H. K., & Swana, M. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2388747 · Cited by 3
Advancing the methodological frontiers of research into teaching in higher education
Brooke, M., Nind, M., Harrison, N., & Mpamhanga, K. (2024) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2024.2393070 · Cited by 3
How the Idea of Social Contagion Shaped Trans Medicine
Slagstad, K. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmms2407430 · Cited by 3
Clutterbuck, D., Ramasawmy, M., Pantelic, M., Allsopp, G. M., Gabbay, M., Hayer, J., Heightman, M., Mu, Y., Sunkersing, D., Wootton, D. G., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.12.12.24318614 · Cited by 3
Towards a Feminist Decolonial Governance of AI
Mesa-Vélez, L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0043 · Cited by 3
Honouring the Legitimacy and Power of Shared Lived Experience in Social Work
Gair, S. (2025) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2025.2463136 · Cited by 3
Interrogating oppressive gender structures: how to better support transgender people
Hendl, T., & Britton, R. L. (2023) · Australasian Philosophical Review · doi:10.1080/24740500.2023.2441478 · Cited by 3
Sangwa, S., Butera, A., & Mutabazi, P. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5368756 · Cited by 3
Yang, Y. T. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2554802 · Cited by 3
Empathy, Thick and ThinPreprint
Crockett, M. J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5862422 · Cited by 3
Opaque Price Control and Algorithmic Authority in Financial Markets
Frimpong, V., & Mamuti, A. (2026) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia6010019 · Cited by 3
Hunt, D. F. (2026) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2026.2619251 · Cited by 3
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Formative Epistemic Injustice, and Educators’ Solutions
Smith, S. J. (2026) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-026-10100-4 · Cited by 2
Eventful Conversations and the Positive Virtues of a Listener
Piñeiro, J., & Simpson, J. (2020) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-020-00429-x · Cited by 2
Ngaphu, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.018 · Cited by 2
Roman, T. (2022) · British Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1177/13594575221090180 · Cited by 2
Axel Honneth and the Recognition Paradigm of Critical Theory
Ibsen, M. F. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864123.003.0008 · Cited by 2
de Diego, M. C. (2023) · Journal of Feminist Gender and Women Studies · doi:10.15366/jfgws2022.13.002 · Cited by 2
Injustiças Testemunhais Institucionalizadas
Fricker, M. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal · doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.820 · Cited by 2
Self-citationArticulations of language and value(s) in scholarly publishing circuits
Shi, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38148 · Cited by 2
The devil in the details: How high‐impact practices can miss the mark
Museus, S. D., & LePeau, L. A. (2023) · New Directions for Student Services · doi:10.1002/ss.20451 · Cited by 2
Hate, Identification, and Othering
Helm, B. W. (2023) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.60.3.06 · Cited by 2
Recognition, power, and trust: Epistemic structural account of ideological recognition
Narita, H. (2023) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12708 · Cited by 2
Insult and Injustice in Epistemic Partiality
Warman, J. (2023) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-023-09966-1 · Cited by 2
Knowing your past: Trauma, stress, and mnemonic epistemic injustice
Puddifoot, K., & Sandelind, C. (2024) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12557 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Justice and Authentic Assessment
McArthur, J. (2024) · Debating higher education: philosophical perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9852-4_9 · Cited by 2
Gender as a Category of Analysis in Medical Knowledge
Amoretti, M. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_95-1 · Cited by 2
Linder, C., Caradonna, C. Y., Hodges, Q., & Moore, A. (2024) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012241247191 · Cited by 2
Manufacturing the Illusion of Epistemic Trustworthiness
Porter, T. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.14 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Class Injustice: Class Composition and Industrial Action
Novis, K. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2343732 · Cited by 2
Demart, S., & Pezeril, C. (2024) · Nouvelles Questions Féministes · doi:10.3917/nqf.431.0088 · Cited by 2
Moral Distress as Moral Heuristic Missing the Mark
Reed, P. G. (2024) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08943184241247003 · Cited by 2
Mladenov, T. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6056-7_33 · Cited by 2
Pós-Humanismo e educação matemática: incursões e desafios da história na era do antropoceno
da Silva, H., & de Souza, L. A. (2024) · Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática · doi:10.5007/1981-1322.2024.e97591 · Cited by 2
Gagnon, C. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1112275ar · Cited by 2
Hemmington, J. (2024) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250241268731 · Cited by 2
Educación de los pueblos originarios en Colombia, subalternización e injusticia cognitiva
Calvo, C. A. O. (2024) · Revista Internacional de Desarrollo Humano y Sostenibilidad · doi:10.51660/ridhs1251 · Cited by 2
Women in the Metaverse and the gender data gap: a cultural approach
Morriello, R. (2024) · JLIS it · doi:10.36253/jlis.it-623 · Cited by 3
Covid-19 and Global Structural Health Inequality
Chung, R. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198892878.003.0009 · Cited by 2
On Testimonial and Hermeneutical (In)justices in the Use of Trans Narratives in Bedrock Gender
Salskov, S. A., & Manhire, R. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2401133 · Cited by 2
Social workers and generative practices for the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities
Knevel, J., Wilken, J. P., & Schippers, A. (2024) · Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1177/14680173241278965 · Cited by 2
Thomas, A., Archer, A., & Engelen, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197781722.001.0001 · Cited by 3
"For Me, Data is Ammunition": Metaphors and Community Organizers' Data Imaginaries
Pei, L., Serrano, U., & Crooks, R. N. (2024) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3678884.3681878 · Cited by 2
Watts, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68881-2_4 · Cited by 2
Knowledge(s) and Power in the Stop Line 3 Movement: From Colonial Logics to Epistemic Justice
Miller, S. (2024) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.13114 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
