The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,701–4,800 of 12,257
Owis, B. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426298 · Cited by 2
“Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality
Vayo, A. B. (2024) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12258 · Cited by 3
Dehghan, R. (2024) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10237-4 · Cited by 2
Russell, J. L. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00908-2 · Cited by 2
Odier-Guedj, D., & Chatenoud, C. (2024) · La nouvelle revue - Éducation et société inclusives · doi:10.3917/nresi.101.0035 · Cited by 2
A systematic review of key principles relating to decolonising interventions in midwifery education
Thomas, S., Allan, G., Heaslip, V., & Furber, C. (2025) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101869 · Cited by 2
Non-Idealised Virtue Epistemology as Particularist Virtue Theory
Tanesini, A. (2025) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2025.2456822 · Cited by 2
Palacios, M. I. G., & Shabel, P. N. (2025) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/etho.70001 · Cited by 2
‘Lemons to lemonade’: Identity integration in researchers with lived experience of psychosis
Hogg, L. I., Branitsky, A., Morrison, A. P., Kurz, T., & Smith, L. G. E. (2025) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12582 · Cited by 2
Verletzbarkeit und Gesellschaft: Soziologische Perspektiven auf Vulnerabilität
Hartmann, E., & Nungesser, F. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2025-2010 · Cited by 2
Mascat, J. M. H. (2024) · Democratic Theory · doi:10.3167/dt.2024.110208 · Cited by 2
Li, Y., He, Z. L., Jin, X., Zhen-bin, Z., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Gao, Y. (2025) · Population Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.70006 · Cited by 2
Carbone, F. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01431-1 · Cited by 2
Lermytte, E., Scavarda, A., Hilário, A. P., Gariglio, L., Mendonça, J., & Ceuterick, M. (2025) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118045 · Cited by 2
Restorative, Transitional, and Transformative Justice
McAlinden, A., Keenan, M., & Gallen, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191967399.003.0011 · Cited by 2
En sånn fyr? Om erkjennelse og rehabilitering etter å ha blitt dømt for voldtekt
Kruse, A. E., & Houge, A. B. (2025) · doi:10.23865/cdf.246.ch6 · Cited by 2
Co-developing an educational platform against ageism with older adults: A use case from Switzerland
Wallimann, M., Inerle, K., Ferrario, A., Benz-Steffen, E., & Demiray, B. (2025) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2025.2484333 · Cited by 2
Alvarado, R. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04993-w · Cited by 2
Abawi, Z. E. (2025) · Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies · doi:10.61186/johepal.6.1.90 · Cited by 2
Voter deterrence campaigns and the moral-epistemic landscape of political microtargeting
Seybold, S. L. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09831-8 · Cited by 2
Disability and Social Epistemology
Reynolds, J. M., & Timpe, K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.24 · Cited by 2
Standpoint Epistemology as Ideology Critique
Toole, B. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.27 · Cited by 2
Faulkner, P. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191999284.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Tenhave, A., Bognar, R., & Sidis, A. (2025) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2025.2495891 · Cited by 2
“Bogeymen,” “Murderers,” and “Loonies” : Emotions in Dutch Debates on 5G and Health
Moes, F., Bröer, C., & Horstman, K. (2025) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439251333090 · Cited by 2
Whistleblowing as Disclosure Injustice: Testimonial and Structural Barriers to Being Heard
Kenny, K. M., & Batishcheva, M. (2025) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.13270 · Cited by 2
Progressive Confucianism: Its Proponents and Prospects
Carleo, R. A. (2025) · The Philosophical Forum · doi:10.1111/phil.12383 · Cited by 2
The Development of Gilbert Ryle’s Conception of Knowledge
Kremer, M. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Easier Said than Done: The Politics of Medical Integration
Muyskens, K. (2025) · Asian Bioethics Review · doi:10.1007/s41649-024-00341-1 · Cited by 2
Autobiographical Epistemology: Legitimate(d) Knowledges in Life Narratives
Kulbaga, T. A., & Spencer, L. G. (2025) · Women s Studies in Communication · doi:10.1080/07491409.2025.2489601 · Cited by 4
From Object to Subject Through Identity Collages: Journeys to the Metaphor-Informed Identity
Iannone, R. L., & Murdock, E. (2025) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-025-00487-w · Cited by 3
ALGORITHMS AND JUSTICE: AN ERA OF UNCERTAINTY AND DOUBT
Basu, N., & Dave, R. (2024) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.5268 · Cited by 2
Epistemic historising and the pillars of independent living
Mladenov, T. (2025) · Social movement studies · doi:10.1080/14742837.2025.2512713 · Cited by 2
Exploring the Merchera Ethnic Group Through ChatGPT: The Risks of Epistemic Exclusion
Oronoz, S., Pérez, A. M., & Peña‐Martínez, J. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16060461 · Cited by 3
Rudolph, R. E. (2024) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12206 · Cited by 2
Children's rights from a childist perspective
Wall, J. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003510284-6 · Cited by 2
Afolabi, A. P. (2025) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2025.2500193 · Cited by 2
Foster care from the perspective of younger children – a phenomenological analysis
Kola, S., & Eriksson, P. K. (2025) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2025.2511930 · Cited by 2
Moberg, J. (2025) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323251340935 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Injustice in Algorithmic Systems and the Limits of Civil Rights Law
Wood, A., & Edenberg, E. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732213 · Cited by 2
Ravi, M., Tyagi, S., Gopikumar, V., de Wit, E. E., Bunders, J., Padgett, D. K., & Regeer, B. J. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100123 · Cited by 2
Kenny, N., Doyle, J. K., O’Neill, C., Doyle, J. K., O’Kelly, J., Earley, F., & Neilson, S. (2026) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613261440799 · Cited by 4
Temporalizing “justice” in urban regeneration: thinking with Lockleaze
Jon, I. (2025) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2025.2517872 · Cited by 2
Mobility Justice for Persons With Disability: Body–Environment Interactions and Velomobility
Norcliffe, G. B., & Radford, J. (2025) · International Journal of Disability and Social Justice · doi:10.13169/intljofdissocjus.5.1.0002 · Cited by 2
bin Tyeer, S. R. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.254 · Cited by 2
Stanley, B. (2025) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012251352860 · Cited by 2
Sewpaul, V., Theophilus, V., & Sentane, M. (2025) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2025.2517847 · Cited by 2
Designing with Decolonial Intent: Towards a Decolonial Archive in Resistance to Epistemicide
Comber, R., Järdemar, C., Tsimba, F., Woytuk, N. C., Murdeshwar, A., & Lunyanga, S. (2025) · Conference on Designing Interactive Systems · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735739 · Cited by 4
Testimonial injustice in the treatment of children’s testimonies: inconsiderate and unjust cases
Elicor, P. P. E., & Bussmann, B. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie · doi:10.1007/s42048-025-00226-4 · Cited by 2
Mullen, P. (2025) · Feminist Dissent · doi:10.31273/fd.n8.2025.1810 · Cited by 2
Evaluating Justice: Toward A Methodological Framework for Geographic Research
Przybylinski, S., Mitchell, D., & Ohlsson, J. (2025) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2025.2522844 · Cited by 2
“To resist, first we must see”: unlearning caste privilege among university students
Zare, B., & Pathania, G. J. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01501-4 · Cited by 2
Theoretical and philosophical perspectives on race and racism in education
Jackson, L. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580 · Cited by 2
Mitova, V. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2025.2539820 · Cited by 2
Huang, Z. M., & Cockayne, H. (2025) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2025.2532660 · Cited by 2
Karmakar, G. (2025) · Public humanities. · doi:10.1017/pub.2025.10043 · Cited by 2
The Changing Social Work Landscape: Addressing Race and Antiracism
Voisin, D. R., & Denby, R. W. (2025) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/737263 · Cited by 2
Beyond Critique: Bringing the Humanities into Technology Research
Shuey, O., Afsari, K., Azamnia, V., Burning, C., Frommer, L., Shew, A., & Williams, D. P. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) · doi:10.1109/ethics65148.2025.11098337 · Cited by 2
Artificial Exchange: Chatbots and the Ethics of Museum Experience Design
Brown, K. (2025) · Springer series on cultural computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89521-0_13 · Cited by 2
Cowley, L., Henriques, S., Roberts, J., Monje‐Garcia, L., Nolan, J., Lubasch, K., Theobald, R., Greer, R., Fennell, N., Clarkson, A., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086962 · Cited by 2
Higgins, K. C., Banet‐Weiser, S., & Iserte, M. (2025) · Cahiers du Genre · doi:10.3917/cdge.078.0129 · Cited by 2
Deconstructing gender bias in AGI: mitigating discriminatory architectures in general intelligence
Moya, C. C., & Rodríguez, E. Q. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00818-1 · Cited by 2
Fragile and fractured communities of ‘lived experience’: Desistance and Co-optation
Antojado, D. (2025) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2025.2551575 · Cited by 3
Miller, D., Kosek, A., & Morgan, R. (2025) · Equity in Education & Society · doi:10.1177/27526461251371312 · Cited by 2
ÖZTÜRK, G. M. (2025) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h14090174 · Cited by 2
Comprendre et définir le savoir expérientiel
Gardien, È. (2025) · Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social · doi:10.7202/1119322ar · Cited by 2
Meluvor, N. M. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.10053 · Cited by 2
Expression and Erasure: AI, English, and the Shaping of Digital Futures
Parvin, N. (2025) · Decennial Aarhus Conference · doi:10.1145/3737609.3747117 · Cited by 3
Crimmins, G., Casey, S., Thomas, K. C., & Tsouroufli, M. (2025) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70032 · Cited by 3
What Do we Know About Gender-Based Violence in Schools and Universities in India? A Scoping Study
Saini, R., & Mok, S.-K. J. (2025) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00131946.2025.2551745 · Cited by 2
Education as a common good and youth activism to regenerate rural communities
Giardiello, M., & Capobianco, R. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102768 · Cited by 2
Kalisvaart, M., Oldenhof, L., Bal, R. A., & Pot, A. M. (2025) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.70075 · Cited by 2
Chandler, J. A. (2025) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.70000 · Cited by 2
Para una epistemología crítica basada en el territorio
Carrasco‐Campos, Á. (2025) · CIC Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación · doi:10.5209/ciyc.102523 · Cited by 3
"How could you be so oblivious?": Positive epistemic duties and oppressive ignorance
Martín, A. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02404-x · Cited by 2
Which Value Counts? Towards a Decolonial Perspective on Value Creation
Herzog, L. M., & Pereira, F. S. M. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-025-06148-w · Cited by 3
Narratives of Resistance: Ethics, Expertise, and Co-Production in the Intersex Rights Movement
Crocetti, D. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14100571 · Cited by 2
Jenkins, C. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf084 · Cited by 2
The Keystone Loop, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Reparations to Oneself
Wright, S. J. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96041-3_7 · Cited by 2
Gender Oppression and Injustice in Medicine
Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_97 · Cited by 2
Thiessen, S. (2025) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/capa.70028 · Cited by 2
Shaw, M., & Stones, A. (2025) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2025.2560409 · Cited by 2
Rocha, M. D. N., & Gottschalk, C. M. C. (2025) · Educational Theory · doi:10.1111/edth.70052 · Cited by 2
Fomiatti, R., & Stanton, K. (2025) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-025-01239-3 · Cited by 4
Hlodak, J., Gecková, A. M., Veselská, Z. D., & Feketeová, E. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100649 · Cited by 2
Vincent, J. (2025) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2025.2570348 · Cited by 2
Bourgeois‐Gironde, S. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00966-6 · Cited by 3
Liang, J. “., & Liou, D. D. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2025.2571487 · Cited by 2
Who are ‘people’ and why are they ‘like us’?: the language-game of dignity
Katz, P. J. (2025) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-025-09729-y · Cited by 2
Wiser Together: Toward a Theory of Epistemic Reputation
Jarczewski, D. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.10084 · Cited by 2
When are conceptual innovations empowering? The case of incels
Herissone-Kelly, R., Ronzoni, M., Popa‐Wyatt, M., Deshmukh, A., Berškytė, J., & Chadwick, T. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05298-8 · Cited by 2
Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin
Matras, Y. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.013.13 · Cited by 2
Atmospheres of Exclusion: Dante’s Inferno and the Mathematics Classroom
Xenofontos, C. (2025) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies10060116 · Cited by 2
Enacting participatory research: Supporting social change by centring participants’ agency
Amara-Hammou, K. (2025) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/07591063251370955 · Cited by 2
Participatory research in education: Epistemological, methodological and ethical challenges
Felder, F., & Garz, J. T. (2025) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785251391555 · Cited by 2
Thurston, M., Warden, R., Thurston, C., Hawkins, A., & Bird, H. (2025) · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · doi:10.1177/0145482x251384663 · Cited by 2
Viewpoint and Political Diversity and the NASW Code of Ethics
Watson, M., & Alam, N. (2025) · Journal of Teaching in Social Work · doi:10.1080/08841233.2025.2567238 · Cited by 2
Yee, A. K. (2025) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/00483931251394826 · Cited by 2
Racism in Academia and Research Publishing: Unveiling the Hidden Struggles of African Researchers
Abimbola, I.-A. L. (2025) · Journal of Management World · doi:10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.1224 · Cited by 2
Mallory, F. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02428-3 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
