The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,801–4,900 of 12,257
Cesarano, F. (2025) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-025-10521-z · Cited by 2
Can Frickerian Accounts of Epistemic Justice Promote Decoloniality?: A Critical Examination
Herr, R. S. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.10085 · Cited by 2
Gauci, S. A. (2025) · Malta Journal of Education · doi:10.62695/uhso3751 · Cited by 2
Yamaguchi, Y. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02733-9 · Cited by 2
The Tempo Giusto : A Call for Recalibrating Time in Human Movement Research
Ramalho, A. L. G., Duarte‐Mendes, P., Paulo, R. M., & Petrica, J. (2025) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2025.2586504 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Work and Epistemic Justice in Just Green Transitions
Valkenburg, G. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95075-9_6 · Cited by 2
Beyond the deficit: From damage to desire in intersex studies
Griffiths, D. A., & Prandelli, M. (2025) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647001251389803 · Cited by 2
Artis, A., Ottaviani, F., & Ribeiro, L. A. (2025) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-025-09769-5 · Cited by 2
Okagbare, F., Swartz, A., Padfield, D., & Ahmad, A. (2025) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2025-013243 · Cited by 2
Affect, attention, and injustice: The injustice of Neglected Affect
Puddifoot, K. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2588383 · Cited by 2
Davis, R. W. (2025) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/papa.70009 · Cited by 2
Research ethics and integrity challenges in accelerated clinical trials, an interview study
Perelló, C. P., Inguaggiato, G., van Eck, L., de Jong, H. K., Hermans, S., Grobusch, M. P., van den Hoven, M., & Evans, N. (2025) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-025-01328-9 · Cited by 2
Hill, L. H., & Conceição, S. C. O. (2025) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.70018 · Cited by 2
Vereecken, N. J., Héger, M., Mweze, M. A., Razakamiaramanana, A. N., Karanja, R. H. N., Kiatoko, N., & Noiset, P. (2025) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d17120826 · Cited by 2
Charles, K., Zhanjun, W., Rajabu, I. M., Irene, E. C., & Mahmood, A. (2025) · Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4217-7.ch010 · Cited by 2
Passmore, S. R., Medina, M. N., Mack, C., Randolph, M., & Ausderau, K. (2025) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/15562646251400490 · Cited by 2
Fatherazi, R., Balch, A., Hutchison, K., Lasonder, J., Dibie, I. S., Asquith, W., Templer, I., Glasson, O., Johnstone, O., Tecca, V., et al. (2025) · Journal of Human Trafficking · doi:10.1080/23322705.2025.2582453 · Cited by 2
Miragoli, M. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02411-y · Cited by 2
Runacres, J., Tolhurst, E., Runacres, J. B., & Harvey, H. (2025) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-025-00248-3 · Cited by 2
Wehrle, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05576-7_4 · Cited by 2
Framing Situated Knowledge: A Knowledge Framework for Gender and Sustainability in the Global South
Liu, M., & Heinonen, T. (2025) · Gender and sustainability in the Global South · doi:10.1515/gsgs-2025-0005 · Cited by 2
Halonen, U., Aerschot, L. V., Blomqvist, K., Hautsalo, K., Eskola, P., Aaltonen, M., & Pirhonen, J. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251385444 · Cited by 2
Affectivating Positionality. Autoethnography of an Extreme Field
Modugno, R. (2025) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-025-00541-7 · Cited by 2
Knowledge and Conceptual Engineering
Simion, M., & Kelp, C. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780198918059.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Pushbacks in Greece as enemy under-criminalization
Kourakis, F. (2026) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/14624745251410606 · Cited by 2
The Weight of Feeling “Otherized”: Asexuality, Allonormativity, and Affective Injustice
Walter, S., & Bruch, K. A. D. (2025) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-025-00939-1 · Cited by 2
Eitenberger, M., & Lehner, L. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118963 · Cited by 2
Hu, J. (2026) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x251410177 · Cited by 2
Hermeneutic injustice and troubling experiences of interactional inequality: a review
Stevanovic, M., Leinonen, M., Nevalainen, H., Valtonen, A., & Weiste, E. (2026) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text-2024-0286 · Cited by 2
Ndofirepi, A. P., & Pietersen, D. (2025) · Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.59915/jes.2025.si1.12 · Cited by 2
Epistemic injustice: experience of family carers and the lived experience workforce
Brown, K. (2026) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/18387357.2025.2611971 · Cited by 2
Anything but Endo: Diagnostic Buck‐Passing in Endometriosis Diagnosis
Dexter, R., Kitts, M., Welty, H., & Jeske, M. (2026) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70142 · Cited by 2
Tavy, Z. K. C. T., van de Bovenkamp, H., Ham, A., Dikken, J., & van Hoof, J. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251414242 · Cited by 2
Beltoft, S. L., Nielsen, J., Askegaard, S., & Schneider‐Kamp, A. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261417903 · Cited by 2
Decolonial feminist analysis of personal assistance policies in EU member states
Rodríguez‐Garrido, P., Ferrante, C., Vásquez, A., Pino‐Morán, J. A., Schöngut‐Grollmus, N., & Lapierre, M. (2026) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2026.2618158 · Cited by 2
Environmental Health Geographies: Absorption and the “New Abnormal”
Hinchliffe, S. (2026) · Progress in Environmental Geography · doi:10.1177/27539687251415563 · Cited by 2
Networked Humanity. An Enactivist Paradigm for Aligning Humans, Nonhumans, and Machines
Achella, S. (2026) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10354-6 · Cited by 2
The neuro-fiction of addiction immunizations
Barker, K. K., Madden, E. F., Lowe, P. L., & Rickers, K. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119059 · Cited by 2
Mannell, J., Lowe, H., Tanielu, H., Isaako, P. E., Tevaga, P., Apelu, L., Alisi-Fesili, F., & Copas, A. J. (2026) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czag009 · Cited by 2
The philosophers have only interpreted the world
Wolff, J. (2025) · Filozofija i drustvo · doi:10.2298/fid2504985w · Cited by 2
The Promise and Peril of AI in MENA’s Transregional Future: Solidarity or Further Disparities?
Dguidegue, Y. (2026) · Middle East Critique · doi:10.1080/19436149.2026.2616885 · Cited by 2
Knowing or philosophizing? An epistemic injustice perspective on gender inequalities in academia
Vogel, S., & Utoft, E. H. (2026) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2026.2628529 · Cited by 3
Saikia, Y. (2026) · Contemporary Islam · doi:10.1007/s11562-025-00608-w · Cited by 2
Can generative artificial intelligence be considered a cognitive subject? An analytic analysis
Gouveia, S. S., & Wang, Y. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02924-y · Cited by 2
Epistemic and affective harms in Endometriosis diagnosis
Floris, M., Ganz, C., & Grisorio, A. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2632370 · Cited by 2
Serial Infidelity and Psychological Abuse: Diagnostic Blind Spots in Recognising Betrayal Trauma
Ward, R. C. K. (2026) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.1177/00912174261428855 · Cited by 2
Chatzichristos, G., & Papadopoulou, E. E. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100739 · Cited by 2
Brown, A., & Kimber, M. (2026) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874261426374 · Cited by 2
An Ethical Critique of the Doctor’s White Coat and the Patient’s Gown
Bokek‐Cohen, Y. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2632007 · Cited by 2
Boss, G. (2026) · Public humanities. · doi:10.1017/pub.2026.10122 · Cited by 2
Singay, S., Shrestha, P., & Evans, B. (2026) · Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1080/29984475.2026.2635490 · Cited by 2
Lackey, J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197833988.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Toward beautiful and good research: crossing the production of generative knowledge
Gambirasio, M., Toscano, A., Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qrom-07-2025-3103 · Cited by 2
Before It Was ‘New’: A Neglected History of Lived Experience–Led Criminal Justice
Buck, G., Rive, M., & Rogers, A. (2026) · The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1111/hojo.70029 · Cited by 2
Decolonizing Academia: Epistemic Gatekeeping and Revisiting “Womanhood” in Global South Studies
Suleymani, S. (2026) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.70063 · Cited by 2
Robotic Bias and Its Dimensions
Furlanis, T., Brščić, D., & Kanda, T. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3757279.3785613 · Cited by 2
Podreka, J., & Zidar, M. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17030351 · Cited by 2
Algorithmic ableism and the normative body: Disability in the age of technocapitalist AI
İnce, E. (2026) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.1177/10554181261433364 · Cited by 2
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and writing for scholarly publication
Riazi, A. M. (2025) · Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes · doi:10.1075/jerpp.00031.ria · Cited by 2
Trauma-informed queer pedagogy in vulnerable contexts: a phenomenological inquiry
David, S. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-40063-y · Cited by 2
Quenum, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1772856 · Cited by 2
Deliberation as a condition for meaningful participation in health and healthcare research
Marinus, J. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1709598 · Cited by 2
Translatability as a structural response to epistemic injustice
Vannini, A. (2026) · Philosophy of Translation · doi:10.1080/29984750.2026.2645782 · Cited by 2
School Anxiety Experienced by Autistic Children: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors
Fisher, E., Rob, P., MacLennan, K., Mullally, S. L., Rodgers, J., & Tzemou, E. (2026) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-026-09852-8 · Cited by 2
From 'objectivity' to obedience: LLMs as discourse, discipline, and power
Kouros, T. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02994-y · Cited by 3
Eger, C., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70127 · Cited by 2
Eby, M., Xu, J., Spencer, N. E., Donnellan, N. M., & Chang, J. C. (2026) · Women s Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2026.2636616 · Cited by 2
Agana, T. A., Akapule, S. A., & Mokulogo, R. K. (2026) · African Quarterly Social Science Review · doi:10.51867/aqssr.3.1.43 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Limits of Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models
Zhang, Y. (2026) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-026-10030-x · Cited by 3
Kim, Y., & Li, X. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01641-1 · Cited by 2
Leah, C., Dixon, J., Craig, E., Heyes, K., Best, D., Bergqvist, A., & Haines‐Delmont, A. (2026) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000567 · Cited by 2
Saso-Baudaux, G., Henry, A., Gaer, I., Anderson, J., Barned, C., Bell, J., Buchman, D. Z., de Bie, L., Doussau, A., Duthie, K., et al. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1124212ar · Cited by 2
Algorithmic co-arguers: AI-mediated argumentation and structural epistemic injustice
Ahmed, M. F., Jraibi, N.-E. H., Mahmud, M. S., Oyshee, A. A. N., & Ahmed, S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01078-3 · Cited by 2
Generative artificial intelligence for inclusive research
Doan, T. V., & Woosnam, K. M. (2026) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2025-1128 · Cited by 2
Race, Language, Culture, and Disability in Inclusive Higher Education
Sarkar, R., & Srivastava, A. K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0976-5.ch001 · Cited by 2
Artificial intelligence harmscapes: rethinking digital governance in the age of cognitive tools
Hübschle, A. M., & Shearing, C. D. (2026) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2026.2647199 · Cited by 2
Epistemic injustice, niche construction, and neurodiversity
Kadodia, Z., & Krueger, J. W. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2657453 · Cited by 2
Temporal lies: A decolonial account of denatured seasonal celebrations in Aotearoa New Zealand
Winter, C. J. (2026) · Time & Society · doi:10.1177/0961463x261426748 · Cited by 2
Iwińska, K., Meler, A., & Troszyński, M. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-02726-w · Cited by 2
Résister au capitalisme académique : un essai sur la justice épistémique
Arnaud, C., Berrier-Lucas, C., Blanchet, V., & Ramboarisata, L. (2026) · Revue de l’organisation responsable · doi:10.54695/ror.211.0008 · Cited by 2
The unheard path: carer loneliness and epistemic injustice in critical and historical view
Cooper, F. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07113-2 · Cited by 2
Speaking Across Silences: Academic Freedom, Care, and Responsibility
Afiouni, F., Boersma, M., Karam, C. M., Miska, C., Shadnam, M., Taylor, S., & van Gils, S. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06297-6 · Cited by 2
Rethinking Human Democracy: From Majoritarianism to Meritocracy
DEMİRKUŞ, N. (2026) · World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences · doi:10.30574/wjaets.2026.19.1.0203 · Cited by 2
Exploring criticality in Nigerian business education: curriculum, pedagogy, and graduate formation
Tiemo, T. H., Gilani, S. A. M., Tantry, A., Armosh, F., Lihe, R., & Askri, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1797120 · Cited by 2
Can You Feel My Pain Tonight? – Automated Pain Assessment and Epistemic Injustice
Loh, W. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01074-9 · Cited by 2
Kahika-Foote, T., Reweti, A., Breheny, M., & Severinsen, C. A. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119295 · Cited by 2
Melder, E., Rubinsztain, V., Jiaqi, Vonbuelow, E., & DeVito, M. A. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791112 · Cited by 2
Digital human twins for disabled people: technology for enabling or ableism?
Godwin, E. S., & Smith, M. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03033-6 · Cited by 2
Why We Stay Stuck: A Complex Conceptual Systems Theory for Wicked Problems
Donaldson, J. P. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14040431 · Cited by 2
Wongvorachan, T., & Naknarin, S. (2026) · Journal of Scholarly Communication · doi:10.62160/jsc64 · Cited by 2
Aziz, M., Anjum, G., & Nawaz, A. R. (2026) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057261442096 · Cited by 2
Albakri, M. (2026) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.70057 · Cited by 2
Nietzsche and the limits of genealogical critique
Pearson, J. S. (2026) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2026.2636302 · Cited by 2
Fobosi, S. C., Mkuzo, Z. P., Caluza, M., & Sidzumo, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1781949 · Cited by 2
Alwali, A. (2026) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-12-2025-0393 · Cited by 2
Elden, Å. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17050515 · Cited by 2
Pacific salmon and cumulative injustices in Canada and the USA
Cannon, S. E., Connoy, J. W. H., Esquible, J., Ignace, L., Moore, J. W., Sainsbury, N. C., & Reid, A. J. (2026) · Nature Reviews Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44358-026-00153-1 · Cited by 2
The Rhetoric of Lived Experience in the Scottish Government’s Policymaking
Monteux, S., Smith, M., MacLeod, M., & Fenton, J. (2026) · Scottish Affairs · doi:10.3366/scot.2026.0587 · Cited by 2
Presence Without Belonging: A Conceptual Analysis of Loneliness in Autism
Srinivasan, H. (2026) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1177/25739581261448524 · Cited by 2
Mikulcová, K., Průšová, L., & Mikulec, M. (2026) · Journal of Social Work Practice · doi:10.1080/02650533.2026.2657966 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
