The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,101–4,200 of 12,257
Asking for Reasons as a Weapon: Epistemic Justification and the Loss of Knowledge
Werkheiser, I. (2014) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 4
Skepticism about Skepticism about Moral Responsibility
Robison, J. (2017) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12197 · Cited by 4
Schneider, R. (2018) · European Romantic Review · doi:10.1080/10509585.2018.1487372 · Cited by 4
Imposed Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities
Medina, J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.003.0003 · Cited by 4
“Offensiphobia” is a Red Herring: On the Problem of Censorship and Academic Freedom
Cross, B., & Richardson-Self, L. V. (2019) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-019-09308-z · Cited by 4
Simone de Beauvoir and the “Lunacy Known as ‘Philosophical System’”
Pettersen, T. (2020) · Women in the history of philosophy and sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_9 · Cited by 4
From Postcolonial African Language Lexicography to Globally Competitive e-Lexicography in Africa
Prinsloo, D. J., & Zondi, N. B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.015 · Cited by 4
The Radical Behavioral Challenge and Wide-Scope Obligations in Business
von Kriegstein, H. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04716-w · Cited by 4
Creating Award Winners in the Library: An Account of “Reprizing”
Lawrence, E., & Floegel, D. (2022) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/717235 · Cited by 5
Ka mua, ka muri—Walking backwards into the future
Lewis, L., Walker, S., King, P. T., Mackay, H. T. U., Talamaivao, N., Anderson, D., & Kemp, S. P. (2023) · Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work · doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol35iss1id1016 · Cited by 4
6.4 Implikationen der empirischen Ergebnisse
Abay, R. A. (2023) · Gesellschaft der Unterschiede · doi:10.14361/9783839470534-018 · Cited by 4
Tonhauser, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.30 · Cited by 5
What Is Justified Group Belief?
Lackey, J. A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199656608.003.0003 · Cited by 4
Some Examples of Discrimination
Arthur Charpentier, A. (2024) · Springer Actuarial · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49783-4_6 · Cited by 4
The Encultured Mind: From Cognitive Science to Social Epistemology
Eck, D. C. (2015) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 4
Gender and Feminist Epistemology
Daukas, N. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch5 · Cited by 5
Phenomenology of Illness by HaviCarel. Oxford University Press, $50.00, 272 pp. ISBN 9780199669653
Disher, T. C. (2017) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12812 · Cited by 4
Alfano, M. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10048-0 · Cited by 4
Bonzio, S., Landes, J., & Osimani, B. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02725-w · Cited by 4
Judging Virtuously: Developing an Empathic Capacity for Perceptual Sensitivity
Mar, M. T. D. (2014) · Jurisprudence · doi:10.5235/20403313.5.1.196 · Cited by 4
LEx: A Framework for Operationalising Layers of Machine Learning ExplanationsPreprint
Singh, R., Ehsan, U., Cheong, M., Riedl, M. O., & Miller, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09612 · Cited by 5
Themes from Testimonial Injustice and Trust: Introduction to the Special Issue
Altanian, M., & Baghramian, M. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997400 · Cited by 4
Disrupting Gendered Epistemic Injustice in K-12 mathematics – A Research SynthesisPreprint
Agarwal, P. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7merv · Cited by 4
Lillis, T. (2015) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.28.001int · Cited by 4
Indexing Philosophy in a Fair and Inclusive Key
Fokt, S., Pharr, Q., & Torregrossa, C. (2023) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2022.52 · Cited by 4
Disability, Comedy, and the Multifaceted Discourse
Malli, M. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_206-1 · Cited by 4
Liminal Identities and Epistemic Injustice: Introduction to the Special Issue
Boncompagni, A., & Coliva, A. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2403631 · Cited by 4
Overview of the Special Issue: Embracing the Messiness of Transdisciplinarity
Crofts, K., Rifkin, W., Espig, M., Perey, R., & Bray, H. J. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229622 · Cited by 4
Respecting bodily integrity and autonomy in pediatric populations
Townsend, K. G., & Earp, B. D. (2024) · Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1177/14777509241295568 · Cited by 4
AI and the Disruption of Personhood
Puzio, A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0016 · Cited by 4
Reflecting on ‘Doing Better’: Inclusive and Accessible Qualitative Research Methods
Wayland, S., & Watharow, A. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251332419 · Cited by 4
Anjum, R. L., Price, C., & Rocca, E. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2400079 · Cited by 3
Ingram, D. B. (2021) · Studies in global justice · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72732-1_2 · Cited by 3
Gauthier, M.-C., & Baril, A. (2023) · Nouvelles pratiques sociales · doi:10.7202/1095940ar · Cited by 8
Is Rational Manipulation Permissible?
Breakey, H. (2023) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10382-4 · Cited by 3
Barros, O. C., & Junior, O. D. D. S. (2023) · Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/s0103-7331202333040 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Oppression and Affective Exclusion
Hernandez, A. (2023) · Passion Journal of the European Philosophical Society for the Study of Emotions · doi:10.59123/passion.v1i2.13804 · Cited by 3
Walker, M., Aristizábal, A. B., & Velasco, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45806-4_1 · Cited by 3
Approaches to Epistemic Justice
Meredith, M. (2024) · Debating higher education: philosophical perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9852-4_3 · Cited by 3
Epistemic Injustice and Digital Disinformation: Addressing Knowledge Inequities in the Digital Age
Sugeng, S., Fitria, A., & Bastomi, S. (2024) · DISKURSUS - JURNAL FILSAFAT DAN TEOLOGI STF DRIYARKARA · doi:10.36383/diskursus.v20i1.483 · Cited by 3
Killikelly, C., Comteße, H., Lechner‐Meichsner, F., Sam, J., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2024) · Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health · doi:10.1017/gmh.2024.60 · Cited by 3
Heck, I. (2024) · IJAR – International Journal of Action Research · doi:10.3224/ijar.v20i1.05 · Cited by 3
Courcy, I. (2022) · Cahiers de recherche sociologique · doi:10.7202/1112387ar · Cited by 3
Disruptive Emotions and Affective Injustice Within an African-Inspired Relational Ethics:
Carman, M. (2024) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2024.7117902 · Cited by 3
Neurodiverse Research Collaboration Within a European Biomedical Project: Limits and Possibilities
Struyf, J., Ingard, C., & Rosqvist, H. B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66127-3_5 · Cited by 3
Neuromixed Participatory Action Research: A Dialogical Method
Désormeaux-Moreau, M., & Courcy, I. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66127-3_9 · Cited by 3
Doing Participatory ADHD-led Research
Hultman, L., & Hultman, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66127-3_12 · Cited by 3
Lundberg, A., Mantu, S., Persdotter, M., Tabin, J.-P., & Wernesjö, U. (2024) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/02610183241273648 · Cited by 3
Hermeneutical Injustice Through Defective Concept Possession
Deans, D. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10096-x · Cited by 3
From capacitalism to disability justice in academia: A philosophical manifesto
Berthelot-Raffard, A. (2024) · Equity in Education & Society · doi:10.1177/27526461241307326 · Cited by 3
At the heart or on the periphery: gender, (in)visibility and epistemic positioning in academia
Järvinen, M., & Mik‐Meyer, N. (2024) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2024.2442923 · Cited by 3
Engaged Scholarship and Its Discontents
Molla, T. (2025) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.9124 · Cited by 3
Bhattacharyya, M., & Mishra, A. (2025) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h14010015 · Cited by 3
Cohen‐Rimer, Y. (2025) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107269 · Cited by 3
Ishkanian, A., Ooms, T., van Paassen, B. J., Kurt, A., Puri, I., & Spector, B. (2025) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2025.2455967 · Cited by 3
Credibility excess as an epistemic injustice
Dyck, K. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.44 · Cited by 3
Holroyd, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191979620.001.0001 · Cited by 3
Yang, L., & Li, M. (2025) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00356 · Cited by 4
You Think You Know Someone: Trans Identities and Epistemic Injustice
Henckel, S. J. (2025) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2025.4 · Cited by 3
Jeong and asar: Theorising reparative concepts in gendered artistic, activist, and academic spaces
Mun, O., & Kudaibergenova, D. T. (2025) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068251330986 · Cited by 3
Crossroads of consciousness: whose decolonization is it in Nigeria?
Olaniyan, Y. D., & Martins, M. O. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1535330 · Cited by 3
Conservative voices in social work education: a transformative approach to the classroom
Blair, S. C., & Nichols, C. B. (2025) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2025.2514673 · Cited by 3
Payment of Participants with Disability in Research: A Scoping Review and Framework
Smith‐Merry, J., & Mellifont, D. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14060374 · Cited by 3
Knowledge Gaps about Mining Impacts on Sami Lands
Duca, L. D., Abril, A., Larsen, R. K., Macura, B., Haddaway, N., & Boström, M. (2025) · Journal of Northern Studies · doi:10.36368/jns.v17i1.1232 · Cited by 3
Maynard, E., Blake‐Holmes, K., Bynoe, S., Culpin, I., Williams, G. J., Hayes, V., & Wojtowicz, M. A. (2025) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/18387357.2025.2517316 · Cited by 3
Mapping Intimate Partner Financial Abuse Across Public and Private Systems
Byrt, A., Cook, K., Burgin, R., & Dimopoulos, G. (2025) · Australian Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1002/ajs4.70044 · Cited by 3
Musleh, S., Liu, R., & Roy, E. (2025) · Journal of International and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/17513057.2025.2522089 · Cited by 3
Yang, L., Zhu, Y., Wu, X. V., & Yang, R. (2025) · Comparative Education Review · doi:10.1086/736424 · Cited by 3
Towards an ecological university: A new dawn or a ‘Silent Spring’?
Kinchin, I. M. (2025) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2025.2525787 · Cited by 3
Jayadeva, S., & Lupton, D. A. (2025) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385251351252 · Cited by 3
Rooney, E. J., Makaza, M., & Wilson, R. L. (2025) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.70262 · Cited by 3
Countering Censorship of Queer Picturebooks Through Disorientation and Epistemic Responsibility
Clark, C. T., Lo, R. S., & Chrisman, A. (2025) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.70042 · Cited by 3
Can we cross? Exploring the epistemic-linguistic line in an in-service teacher education context
Ennser‐Kananen, J., Jäntti, S., & Riuttanen, S. (2025) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/14749041251359707 · Cited by 3
Arora, A. (2025) · Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/19349637.2025.2548539 · Cited by 4
Silencing in data science practices
Lassen, I. M. S., Bjerring, J. C., & Nielbo, K. L. (2025) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251365228 · Cited by 4
A Manifesto for Ecological Healing: Valuing Traditional Knowledge in Mozambique
Cambaza, E. (2025) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe16030040 · Cited by 3
Liu, C.-H., Nesterova, Y., Anderson, S. K., & Hasanzade, S. (2025) · Human Rights Education Review · doi:10.1080/25355406.2025.2556297 · Cited by 3
Calling trauma, elite capture, and hermeneutical injustice
Flores, C. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf076 · Cited by 3
Abolition and Social Work: Dismantling Carceral Logics to Build Systems of Care
Washington, D. M., Brown, B. R., Ballesteros, D., & Davis, R. L. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14090535 · Cited by 3
Addressing Self-Exclusion in Upscaled Mini-Publics: Evidence from CoFE’s European Citizens’ Panels
Ballangé, A. (2025) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.1758 · Cited by 6
Palafox-Hernandez, A. F., Martinez-Ainsworth, N. E., Pérez-Martínez, A. L., Sierralta-Gutiérrez, A., & Jardón‐Barbolla, L. (2025) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-025-09994-0 · Cited by 3
Meaningful public involvement: changing research institutions toward epistemic justice
Krawczyk, T., Piasecki, J., Galica, J., & Waligóra, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655189 · Cited by 3
Mikulcová, K. (2025) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaf180 · Cited by 3
Navigating and reframing tensions within equity‐centered learning health systems
Abejirinde, I. O., & Wood, B. (2025) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.70040 · Cited by 3
Zhang, J. Y. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2025.2557066 · Cited by 3
Epistemic relations and epistemic reparations
Boult, C. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02410-z · Cited by 3
Enciso, S. W., & Bullot, N. J. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02416-7 · Cited by 3
Diversity as Ethical Infrastructure: Reimagining AI Governance for Justice and Accountability
Iseko, A. (2025) · International Journal of Science Technology and Society · doi:10.11648/j.ijsts.20251305.13 · Cited by 3
Morton, L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197804995.001.0001 · Cited by 3
Rewriting the byline: toward epistemic justice in global health authorship
Ghimire, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621979 · Cited by 3
Irish, B. N., Chambers, C. T., Dol, J., Parker, J. A., Huber, A. M., Brandelli, Y. N., Nichols, D., & Brause, J. (2025) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13075-025-03651-3 · Cited by 3
Kim, T., & Ishimaru, A. M. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2025.2572466 · Cited by 3
Matutini, E., Chiara, G., & Brondi, S. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17209208 · Cited by 4
Somerville, F., & Ward, S. (2025) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2025.2564536 · Cited by 3
Kitterød, H. R., Hagen, A. L., & Lorenzen, S. B. (2025) · Nordisk tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning · doi:10.18261/ntu.6.2.4 · Cited by 3
Voice: A third space in archaeology to advance Indigenous emancipation
Pollard, K., Taylor, C., Bullot, N. J., Enciso, S. W., Davis, O., & Smith, C. (2025) · Australian Archaeology · doi:10.1080/03122417.2025.2562664 · Cited by 3
Vergotine, G., Mazigo, A. F., Molebatsi, P., Ramsarup, P., Mayega, J. L., & McCowan, T. (2025) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2025.2579585 · Cited by 3
Dagan, N. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009587709 · Cited by 3
Shazly, A. E. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf098 · Cited by 3
Uisma, A., Virkki, T., & Ylilahti, M. (2025) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70124 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
