The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,101–5,200 of 12,257
Equity, Evaluation, and International Cooperation
Carolini, G. Y. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192865489.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Novoa, Á. R. (2022) · THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science · doi:10.1387/theoria.23046 · Cited by 2
On hermeneutical openness and wilful hermeneutical ignorance
Landström, K. (2022) · Labyrinth · doi:10.25180/lj.v24i1.284 · Cited by 2
Knowing dissent: the Enlightenment subject within contemporary politics of subjectivity
Bashovski, M. (2022) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2127298 · Cited by 2
Algunos principios de aprendizaje equitativo post-pandemia
Penuel, W. R. (2022) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks.27567 · Cited by 2
Fraser, S. L., Gaulin, D., Loutfi, D., & Nadeau, L. (2022) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-022-00942-7 · Cited by 2
Levin, L., Brafman, M. C., Alnabilsy, R., Pagorek-Eshel, S., & Elias, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.966778 · Cited by 2
Lescano, A. (2022) · Revista de Psicología · doi:10.24215/2422572xe146 · Cited by 3
Freedom of Speech and Democracy
Wilhelm, D. (2022) · Feminist Dissent · doi:10.31273/fd.n6.2022.1262 · Cited by 2
Comprendre les mobilisations contre les violences policières
Boutros, M., Derff, P. L., & Pregnolato, A. (2022) · Champ pénal · doi:10.4000/champpenal.14104 · Cited by 2
The Characteristics of Natural Resource Governance: The Nussir Case, Norway
Laros, V. (2022) · Springer polar sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12459-4_12 · Cited by 2
Phelan, K. M. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2152092 · Cited by 2
Jürgen Habermas and the Communicative Paradigm of Critical Theory
Ibsen, M. F. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864123.003.0006 · Cited by 4
On remembering, unlearning, and creating new stories
Basil, P., Buckley-Zistel, S., & Beck, T. K. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung · doi:10.1007/s42597-022-00084-6 · Cited by 4
Epistemic problems with mental health legislation in the doctor–patient relationship
Newton‐Howes, G., Walker, S., & Pickering, N. J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108610 · Cited by 2
Making Bedlam: Toward a Trauma-Informed Mad Feminist Literary Theory and Praxis
Mason, J. L. (2023) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h12020024 · Cited by 2
Lortan, D., & Maistry, S. M. (2018) · 2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.26803/myres.2018.21 · Cited by 2
Justice, Education, and the World of Today
Bostad, I., Papastephanou, M., & Strand, T. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003327332 · Cited by 2
‘Representational Irony’: Navigating Succession Planning in Youth Civil Society Organisations
Carson, L. (2022) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2023.2199346 · Cited by 2
Schmidt, H. (2022) · doi:10.23865/noasp.167.ch11 · Cited by 2
Deep Disagreement, Epistemic Norms, and Epistemic Self-trust
Barker, S. (2023) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.23 · Cited by 2
DeSanto, D. L. (2023) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.84.3.315 · Cited by 2
Karlsson, A. W., Lundsgaard, H. H., & Janssens, A. I. W. A. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.004 · Cited by 2
Testimonial Injustice in Governmental AI Systems
Gray, C. (2023) · AI critique · doi:10.1515/9783839466605-004 · Cited by 2
Forms of Life and Linguistic Change: The Case of Trans Communities
Boncompagni, A. (2023) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies8030050 · Cited by 2
The Need for Global Philosophy
Gosepath, S. (2023) · Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy · doi:10.1515/yewph-2023-0026 · Cited by 2
Aegerter, A. (2023) · Santé Publique · doi:10.3917/spub.hs2.0059 · Cited by 2
Álvarez, A. D. M. (2023) · Cuestiones de género/Cuestiones de género · doi:10.18002/cg.i18.7585 · Cited by 2
Gendered Violence, Victim Credibility and Adjudicating Justice in Augustine's Letters
Leonard, V. (2023) · Transactions of the Royal Historical Society · doi:10.1017/s0080440123000087 · Cited by 2
de Souza, L. P., de Sousa, R. S. C., Löw, M. M., & Barros, T. H. B. (2023) · Workshop de Informação, Dados e Tecnologia (WIDAT) · doi:10.22477/vi.widat.73 · Cited by 2
What’s Wrong with the “Marketplace of Ideas”?
Herzog, L. M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.003.0005 · Cited by 3
EXPLORING AND CONSTRUCTING PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS: A CORPUS APPROACH
Ilin, I. (2023) · Visnyk of the Lviv University · doi:10.30970/pps.2023.48.7 · Cited by 2
Oppression, Subversive Humor, and Unstable Politics
Marvin, A. (2023) · The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook · doi:10.1515/phhumyb-2023-0007 · Cited by 2
On ‘Systematic theology’ and the contested shape of a discipline
Westerholm, M. (2023) · Stellenbosch Theological Journal · doi:10.17570/stj.2023.v9n1.a11 · Cited by 2
The Look and Feel of Moral Injury
Sherman, N. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197646588.003.0007 · Cited by 2
Mitchell, D. (2023) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.7941370.20 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Dimensions of Surveillance in Public Health Emergencies
Hutchison, K., & Johnson, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864918.003.0006 · Cited by 2
Keyes, O. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192889898.003.0017 · Cited by 2
Gender Justice and Feminist Politics: Decolonizing Collaborative Research
Romero, D. F. (2023) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy7040095 · Cited by 3
Recentring Africa in the Study of Ancient Philosophy
Anakwue, N. C. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003222637-6 · Cited by 2
Karmakar, G., & Pal, P. (2023) · Quarterly Review of Film and Video · doi:10.1080/10509208.2023.2296368 · Cited by 2
Coville, M., & Lallet, M. (2023) · Genre sexualité & société · doi:10.4000/gss.8474 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Responsibility and Community Engagement in Sindiwe Magona’s Beauty’s Gift
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2023) · ELOPE English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries · doi:10.4312/elope.20.2.65-79 · Cited by 2
Two Varieties of White Ignorance
Yaure, P. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/729937 · Cited by 2
Hermeneutical Justice in an International Erasmus Mundus Research Project
Quiroz-Niño, C., Meredith, M., & Villafuerte-Pezo, A. M. (2024) · Debating higher education: philosophical perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9852-4_11 · Cited by 2
Engaging Epistemic Tensions in Graduate Education
Dìaz, L., McBride, R. K., Soto-Olson, D. K., & Nance, A. (2024) · Metropolitan Universities · doi:10.18060/27541 · Cited by 2
Lari, T. (2024) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/beae012 · Cited by 2
The Laws of Indiscipline: Anténor Firmin, Racial Justice, and the Case for a Humanist Anthropology
Craipain, B. (2024) · Dix-Neuf · doi:10.1080/14787318.2024.2318154 · Cited by 2
Kou, T. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658951 · Cited by 2
Rangger, M. (2024) · Pädagogik · doi:10.1515/9783839470060 · Cited by 2
Akhtar, N., & Dinishak, J. (2024) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330241249274 · Cited by 2
Johnson, M. L. (2024) · Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies · doi:10.3828/jlcds.2024.7 · Cited by 2
Delahaye, S. G., & Dubath, C. (2024) · Pensée plurielle · doi:10.3917/pp.058.0166 · Cited by 2
Spurling, N. J. (2024) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2024.2347231 · Cited by 2
Understanding Free Speech as a Two-Way Right
Chan, J. (2024) · Political Philosophy · doi:10.16995/pp.15321 · Cited by 2
How to Do Things with Gendered Words
Hernandez, E. M., & Crowley, A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192844118.013.36 · Cited by 2
Taylor, R. M. (2024) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681241261174 · Cited by 2
The purpose and value of a summer camp for visually impaired young people
Maher, A. J., Haegele, J. A., & Swanston, D. (2024) · British Journal of Visual Impairment · doi:10.1177/02646196241261608 · Cited by 2
Etiology of injustice: An introduction
Erck, S. (2024) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12978 · Cited by 3
Эволюция концепций легитимности политической власти
Ignatjeva, O. (2024) · Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye znania · doi:10.18255/2412-6519-2024-2-152-163 · Cited by 2
La résistance à la contrainte psychiatrique comme ressource
Vernay, O. (2024) · Agora débats/jeunesses · doi:10.3917/agora.097.0088 · Cited by 2
Mallory, A. B., Blackburn, M. V., & Schey, R. (2024) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.1370 · Cited by 2
Understanding Epistemic Injustice as Contributory Injustice
Jalloh, T. (2024) · Quaestio facti Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio · doi:10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23021 · Cited by 3
A social researcher researching social researchers – Lessons from feminist epistemologies
Schwoerer, L. (2024) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941241259980 · Cited by 3
Ochsner, M. (2024) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12618 · Cited by 2
Just pluralism: thinking about concepts of mental disorder in global context
Popa, E. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04724-7 · Cited by 2
Björkas, R., Lindroth, M., & Richert, T. (2024) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107885 · Cited by 2
Gender Oppression and Injustice in Medicine
Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_97-1 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Injustice and Government Information Systems: Lessons from Two Cases
Hulstijn, J., Dong, H., & Markovich, R. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_26 · Cited by 2
Las preposiciones SÍ importan en la investigación educativa
Recio, R. M. V. (2024) · Márgenes Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga · doi:10.24310/mar.5.2.2024.18113 · Cited by 2
Ayala-Colqui, J. (2024) · Agora papeles de Filosofía · doi:10.15304/ag.43.2.9076 · Cited by 2
The Triviality Worry About Gender Terms and Epistemic Injustice
Björkholm, S. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2407641
Directed Blame and Conversation
McKenna, M. S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197679999.003.0003 · Cited by 2
Beyond the traditional distinctions of genome editing: evaluating a vulnerability framework
Angelioudaki, I., Badea, A. R., Bodo, M., Fernández‐Soto, D., Karyampa, E. S., Kokkinakis, A., Kolisis, N., Kominea, X., Armijos, S. O., Vogel, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2024.1426228 · Cited by 3
Wissenschaftstheoretische Missverständnisse des BGH in Strafsachen
Fegert, J. M., Sachser, C., Pusch, M., Kliemann, A., & Gerke, J. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1422-4917/a000995 · Cited by 2
Gender Disparities and Femininity in the Third Mission: The Example of Blog Writing
Gunnarsson, N. V. (2024) · Journal of femininities. · doi:10.1163/29501229-bja10007 · Cited by 2
Schmidt, S., Boulton, A., Butler, B., & Fazio, T. N. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241288371 · Cited by 2
Roussel, S., Restivo, L., & Apostolidis, T. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241291987 · Cited by 2
Enacting Economic Transformation.
Bäuerle, L., & Graupe, S. (2024) · World Futures · doi:10.1080/02604027.2024.2417040 · Cited by 2
Borg, E. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198929031.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Navigating the complexities of resistance in critical human rights education to promote democracy
Scherling, J., & Kasa, T. (2024) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2024.2424131 · Cited by 2
Pinillos, A. S. (2024) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69300-7_15 · Cited by 2
Visualizing ‘Epistemic Injustice’: Deciphering ‘Plurality’ in Orijit Sen’s River of Stories
Sharma, S., & Pal, P. (2024) · South Asian Review · doi:10.1080/02759527.2024.2433321 · Cited by 2
Graphic Activism and Epistemic Justice in Vanni: A Family’s Struggle Through the Sri Lankan Conflict
Sharma, S., & Pal, P. (2024) · Current Writing · doi:10.1080/1013929x.2024.2410077 · Cited by 2
Żak, M. (2024) · Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica · doi:10.18778/0208-6069.109.10 · Cited by 2
Celermajer, D., & Otjen, N. (2024) · Minnesota Review · doi:10.1215/00265667-11369496 · Cited by 2
Ireland‐Blake, N., Cram, F., Dew, K. P., Bacharach, S., Snelling, J., STONE, P. R., Buchanan, C. M., & Filoche, S. K. (2025) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01144-7 · Cited by 2
Between the lines: a discursive analysis of the non-specific low back pain literature
Hebron, C., Ekornsaeter, M., & Mescouto, K. A. (2025) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2024.2446530 · Cited by 2
Victimhood as a positive political resource
Jeong, J. (2025) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/14748851241308809 · Cited by 2
Olaniyan, Y. D. (2025) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7408-5.ch018 · Cited by 2
Silence as epistemic agency in mania
Degerman, D. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10256-9 · Cited by 2
Paris, W. M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197698860.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Muñoz, S. M., Mora, F., Tovar, J. S., & Torres-Baez, D. (2025) · Journal of Hispanic Higher Education · doi:10.1177/15381927251320545 · Cited by 2
Improving ways of working with researchers with lived expertise (of homelessness)
Crichlow, F., Dyer, A., & Jenkinson, J. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00679-2 · Cited by 2
Anyango, C., Goicolea, I., Lövgren, V., & Namatovu, F. (2025) · Journal of Gender-Based Violence · doi:10.1332/23986808y2025d000000074 · Cited by 2
de Oliveira, M. M., & Stevanovic, M. (2025) · Multilingua · doi:10.1515/multi-2024-0108 · Cited by 2
Ludwig, D. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2472783 · Cited by 2
The Pragmatics of Obscuring in Political Philosophy
Björkholm, S., & Yaouzis, N. O. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.70004 · Cited by 2
Kalra, K. K., Viktora-Jones, M., & Augustin, T. J. (2025) · AIB Insights · doi:10.46697/001c.133651 · Cited by 2
Mishandling av barn – medvirkningsansvar og avvergingsplikt
Holmboe, M. (2025) · doi:10.23865/cdf.246.ch5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
