The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 12,257
The Impacts of Democratic Innovations
Ávila-Acosta, F., Carrick, J., Elstub, S., Ercan, S. A., Felicetti, A., Fernández-Martínez, J. L., Font, J., Gastil, J., Geißel, B., Gourgues, G., et al. (2023) · ECPR Press eBooks · doi:10.61675/ksby3068 · Cited by 60
Gendering Climate Knowledge for Justice: Catalyzing a New Research Agenda
Tuana, N. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_2 · Cited by 59
Fulkerson, T. J., & Tushingham, S. (2019) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2019.35 · Cited by 55
Haslanger, S. (2014) · Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x14000095 · Cited by 56
Knowledge and Certainties in the Epistemic State of Nature
Kusch, M. (2011) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0003 · Cited by 56
They can't be believed: children, intersectionality, and epistemic injustice
Baumtrog, M. D., & Peach, H. (2019) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2019.1695280 · Cited by 56
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2022) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997211073947 · Cited by 57
Mormina, M. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2103750 · Cited by 59
Trust, Distrust, and ‘Medical Gaslighting’
Barnes, E. (2023) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqad035 · Cited by 56
9. Ethical and Professional Norms in Community-Based Research
Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Welch, B. (2010) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.85.1.a34748522021115m · Cited by 56
Barnett, C. (2013) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132513514708 · Cited by 56
Rini, R., & Cohen, L. (2022) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v22i2.1628 · Cited by 55
Systematic Epistemic Rights Violations in the Media: A Brexit Case Study
Watson, L. (2018) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1440022 · Cited by 55
Epistemic Diversity and the Question of Lingua Franca in Science and Philosophy
Gobbo, F., & Federica Russo, B. (2019) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-019-09631-6 · Cited by 55
What’s the Good of Language? On the Moral Distinction between Lying and Misleading
Berstler, S. (2019) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/704341 · Cited by 55
Llewellyn‐Beardsley, J., Rennick‐Egglestone, S., Bradstreet, S., Davidson, L., Franklin, D., Hui, A., McGranahan, R., Morgan, K., Pollock, K., Ramsay, A., et al. (2019) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01791-x · Cited by 56
Honouring and Admiring the Immoral
Archer, A., & Matheson, B. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367810153 · Cited by 56
What Can Educational Psychology Learn From, and Contribute to, Theory Development Scholarship?
Greene, J. A. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09682-5 · Cited by 60
Clutterbuck, D., Ramasawmy, M., Pantelic, M., Hayer, J., Begum, F., Faghy, M. A., Nasir, N., Causer, B., Heightman, M., Allsopp, G. M., et al. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14037 · Cited by 55
Wikipediaand the Epistemology of Testimony
Tollefsen, D. P. (2009) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/e1742360008000518 · Cited by 55
McKeown, M., Thomson, G., Scholes, A., Jones, F. A., Downe, S. M., Price, O., Baker, J. A., Greenwood, P., Whittington, R., & Duxbury, J. A. (2019) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13015 · Cited by 55
Moral Uncertainty in Technomoral Change: Bridging the Explanatory Gap
Nickel, P. J., Kudina, O., & van de Poel, I. (2022) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00414 · Cited by 55
Credibility and the Distribution of Epistemic Goods
Lackey, J. A. (2018) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95993-1_10 · Cited by 54
Social Reform in a Complex World
Barrett, J. (2019) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/c47s8023 · Cited by 55
Human Dignity and Human Rights
Killmister, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844365.003.0006 · Cited by 54
Teacher Responsiveness that Promotes Equity in Secondary Science Classrooms
Kang, H. (2021) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2021.1972423 · Cited by 56
Ethical research landscapes in fragile and conflict-affected contexts: understanding the challenges
Shanks, K., & Paulson, J. (2022) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161221094134 · Cited by 54
R’boul, H. (2022) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2022.2055451 · Cited by 54
Puddifoot, K. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12269 · Cited by 56
Davies, T., & Mah, A. (2020) · Manchester University Press eBooks · doi:10.7765/9781526137005 · Cited by 56
There’s No (Testimonial) Justice: Why Pursuit of a Virtue is Not the Solution to Epistemic Injustice
Sherman, B. R. (2015) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2015.1031852 · Cited by 60
Lipinski, S., Blanke, E. S., Suenkel, U., & Dziobek, I. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3797-1 · Cited by 54
Refugee mental health and human rights: A challenge for global mental health
Kronick, R., Jarvis, G. E., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2021) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615211002690 · Cited by 53
JUSTICE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF KNOWLEDGE
Kurtulmuş, F., & Irzık, G. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2015.65 · Cited by 54
Responsibility for testimonial injustice
Piovarchy, A. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01447-6 · Cited by 53
Hui, A., Rennick‐Egglestone, S., Franklin, D., Walcott, R., Llewellyn‐Beardsley, J., Ng, F., Roe, J., Yeo, C. F., Deakin, E., Brydges, S., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250367 · Cited by 58
Racial Differences in Shared Decision-Making About Critical Illness
Ashana, D. C., Welsh, W. E., Preiss, D., Sperling, J. B., You, H., Tu, K., Carson, S. S., Hough, C. L., White, D. B., Kerlin, M. P., et al. (2024) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8433 · Cited by 53
Situating Moral Justification: Rethinking the Mission of Moral Epistemology
Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2013) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12048 · Cited by 53
The Marginalization of Feminist Epistemology and What That Reveals About Epistemology ‘Proper’
Rooney, P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_1 · Cited by 53
Overcoming obstacles to a truly global psychological theory, research, and praxis in Africa
Oppong, S. (2019) · Journal of Psychology in Africa · doi:10.1080/14330237.2019.1647497 · Cited by 52
Baker, S., & Constant, N. (2020) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103921 · Cited by 52
Epistemic Decolonization as Overcoming the Hermeneutical Injustice of Eurocentrism
Posholi, L. (2020) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2020.1779604 · Cited by 52
Capability Sensitive Design for Health and Wellbeing Technologies
Jacobs, N. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00275-5 · Cited by 52
A repertoire of everyday resistance: young Muslims’ responses to anti-Muslim hostility
Ellefsen, R., & Sandberg, S. (2021) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2021.1894913 · Cited by 52
McGowan, M. K. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12034 · Cited by 52
Challenging Anti-Carceral Feminism: Criminalisation, Justice and Continuum Thinking
McGlynn, C. M. S. (2022) · Women s Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102614 · Cited by 58
Peels, R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197654514.001.0001 · Cited by 53
The Ethics of Conceptualization
Queloz, M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.001.0001 · Cited by 52
What Knowers Know Well: Women, Work and the Academy
Wylie, A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_8 · Cited by 52
Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. C. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614525324 · Cited by 52
Adebisi, F. I. (2016) · Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly · doi:10.53386/nilq.v67i4.129 · Cited by 52
Can schools teach citizenship?
Merry, M. S. (2018) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1488242 · Cited by 52
Natural epistemic defects and corrective virtues
Roberts, R. C., & West, R. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0669-5 · Cited by 52
Shabot, S. C. (2020) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700120920764 · Cited by 51
Institutional Opacity, Epistemic Vulnerability, and Institutional Testimonial Justice
Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997393 · Cited by 51
Racial formation and education: A critical analysis of the Sewell report
Tikly, L. P. (2022) · Ethnicities · doi:10.1177/14687968211061882 · Cited by 51
The importance of traditional communities in biodiversity conservation
da Silva, E. C., Guerrero-Moreno, M. A., Oliveira, F. A., Juen, L., de Carvalho, F. G., & de Oliveira, J. M. B. (2024) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-024-02999-3 · Cited by 55
How Can Beliefs Wrong?—A Strawsonian Epistemology
White, S. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191997273.003.0016 · Cited by 51
Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the role of Ubuntu and AI governance initiatives
Yilma, K. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09834-5 · Cited by 51
Ince, A., & de la Torre, G. B. (2016) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.04.001 · Cited by 51
Watson, L. (2015) · American Philosophical Quarterly · Cited by 51
Taylor, A. (2018) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.1 · Cited by 51
Tropical marine sciences: Knowledge production in a web of path dependencies
Partelow, S., Hornidge, A., Senff, P., Stäbler, M., & Schlüter, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228613 · Cited by 55
The Epistemic Dangers of Context Collapse Online
Frost‐Arnold, K. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833659.003.0018 · Cited by 51
Hutchings, T., Benoit, C., & Shillitoe, R. (2022) · Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religion (JBASR) · doi:10.18792/jbasr.v23i0.54 · Cited by 51
The Social Value of Non-Deferential Belief
Hazlett, A. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2015.1049625 · Cited by 50
Authority and Gender: Flipping the F-Switch
Tirrell, L. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.3.5772 · Cited by 50
The Obligation to Diversify One’s Sources
Worsnip, A. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203702444-14 · Cited by 50
National Identity, Pride, and Chauvinism—their Origins and Consequences for Globalization Attitudes
Huddy, L., & Ponte, A. D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0003 · Cited by 54
O’Neill, O. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316286708 · Cited by 50
Knöchelmann, M. (2021) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.94964 · Cited by 59
Boult, C. (2021) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12762 · Cited by 50
Dedding, C. W. M., Groot, B. C., Slager, M. T., & Abma, T. (2022) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2022.2035788 · Cited by 50
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.001.0001 · Cited by 53
Taking fishers’ knowledge and its implications to fisheries policy seriously
Renck, V., Ludwig, D., Bollettin, P., Reis‐Filho, J. A., Poliseli, L., & El-Hani, C. N. (2023) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-14104-280207 · Cited by 53
Bengson, J., Cuneo, T. D., & Shafer‐Landau, R. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198914594.001.0001 · Cited by 50
Craddock, E. (2024) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323241253412 · Cited by 64
Finding Your Voice in the Streets: Street Art and Epistemic Injustice
Bacharach, S. (2017) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onx033 · Cited by 50
Carrel, M., Loignon, C., Boyer, S., & de Laat, M. (2018) · Sociologie et sociétés · doi:10.7202/1042808ar · Cited by 69
Pereira, M. D. M. (2018) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243918795043 · Cited by 57
Contributory injustice in psychiatry
Tate, A. J. M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104761 · Cited by 50
Faure, M. C., Munung, N. S., Ntusi, N., Pratt, B., & de Vries, J. (2021) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-020-01350-w · Cited by 50
Braving Citational Justice in Human-Computer Interaction
Kumar, N., & Karusala, N. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3450389 · Cited by 55
The long goodbye on a disappearing, ancestral island: a just retreat from Isle de Jean Charles
Simms, J. R. Z., Waller, H. L., Brunet, C., & Jenkins, Ṕ. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-021-00682-5 · Cited by 50
Bondy, P. (2010) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v30i3.3034 · Cited by 50
Burlyuk, O., & Musliu, V. (2023) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/s41268-023-00318-x · Cited by 50
Linguistic Justice and Analytic Philosophy
Chiesa, F., & Galeotti, A. E. (2018) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2018.1438443 · Cited by 51
Objectivity, trust and social responsibility
Rolin, K. H. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02669-1 · Cited by 49
Vulnerability in Social Epistemic Networks
Sullivan, E., Sondag, M., Rutter, I., Meulemans, W., Cunningham, S. W., Speckmann, B., & Alfano, M. (2020) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2020.1782562 · Cited by 53
Cootes, H., Heinsch, M., & Brosnan, C. (2020) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaa229 · Cited by 49
Pandemic Risk and Standpoint Epistemology: A Matter of Solidarity
Schaubroeck, K., & Hens, K. (2021) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-021-00443-z · Cited by 49
Queloz, M., & Cueni, D. (2020) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12603 · Cited by 49
Pursuit and inquisitive reasons
Fleisher, W. (2022) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.04.009 · Cited by 49
Epistemic Injustice and Legitimacy in U.S. Doctoral Education: A Systematic Review of Literature
Gonzales, L. D., Pasque, P. A., Farris, K. D., & Hansen, J. M. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231187628 · Cited by 49
Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09927-5 · Cited by 49
Procedural Justice in Carbon Capture and Storage
McLaren, D. P. (2012) · Energy & Environment · doi:10.1260/0958-305x.23.2-3.345 · Cited by 49
Black Women's Liberatory Pedagogies
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65789-9 · Cited by 53
Goldberg, D. S. (2017) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1177/1073110517750581 · Cited by 49
Basu, R. (2018) · Philosophical Topics · doi:10.5840/philtopics20184611 · Cited by 49
Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism
Zwarthoed, D. (2018) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9958-7 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
