The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 12,257
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics
Pratt, B., & Bull, S. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8 · Cited by 33
Introduction to Special Section ‘Infrastructures of Injustice: Migration and Border Mobilities’
Kathiravelu, L. (2021) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1981546 · Cited by 33
Sherman, N. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197501832.001.0001 · Cited by 36
Moral Relativism and Pluralism
Wong, D. B. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009043496 · Cited by 35
Ho, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/med/9780197556269.001.0001 · Cited by 35
Addressing Deficits and Injustices: The Potential Epistemic Contributions of Patients to Research
Hutchison, K., Rogers, W., & Entwistle, V. A. (2016) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-016-0323-5 · Cited by 33
Geosocial Lives in Topological Polis: Mohamed Bouazizi as a Political Agent
Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2016) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1208654 · Cited by 33
Pedagogical injustice and counter-terrorist education
O’Donnell, A. (2017) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/1746197917698490 · Cited by 33
Amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal: Children’s moral status in child welfare
Knezevic, Z. (2017) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568217711742 · Cited by 33
Recognizing Settler Ignorance in the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Cook, A. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6229 · Cited by 32
In the face of epistemic injustices?: on the meaning of people-led war crimes tribunals
Boyle, M., & Kobayashi, A. (2015) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775815598101 · Cited by 32
Mindreading beyond belief: A more comprehensive conception of how we understand others
Spaulding, S. (2018) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12526 · Cited by 32
Táíwò, O. (2018) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2018-0007 · Cited by 32
Interreligious Hermeneutics, Prejudice, and the Problem of Testimonial Injustice
Moyaert, M. (2019) · Religious Education · doi:10.1080/00344087.2019.1610927 · Cited by 32
Rationalism and the silencing and distorting of Indigenous voices
Allard‐Tremblay, Y. (2019) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1644581 · Cited by 36
State Legal Responses to Historical Institutional Abuse: Shame, Sovereignty and Epistemic Injustice.
Enright, M., & Ring, S. (2020) · Éire-Ireland · doi:10.1353/eir.2020.0003 · Cited by 32
Winter, C. J. (2020) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1865726 · Cited by 32
Bueter, A. (2021) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00396-8 · Cited by 32
The Institutional Preconditions of Epistemic Justice
Samaržija, H., & Cerovac, I. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1919238 · Cited by 32
Ball, D. (2020) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12256 · Cited by 32
Stohr, K. E. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190867522.001.0001 · Cited by 32
Lewis, K., Hamilton, L., & Vincent, J. (2023) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2467 · Cited by 40
Osler, L. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10146-4 · Cited by 32
Frantzeskaki, N., Wijsman, K., Kabisch, N., & McPhearson, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2315911121 · Cited by 32
On the Outskirts of the Canon: The Myth of the Lone Female Philosopher, and What to Do about It
Bergès, S. (2015) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12135 · Cited by 32
Reframing Climate Justice: A Three-dimensional View on Just Climate Negotiations
Kortetmäki, T. (2016) · Ethics Policy & Environment · doi:10.1080/21550085.2016.1226238 · Cited by 32
Responsive Evaluation in the Interference Zone Between System and Lifeworld
Abma, T., Leyerzapf, H., & Landeweer, E. G. M. (2016) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214016667211 · Cited by 32
Philosophy with Children as an educational platform for self-determined learning
Kizel, A. (2016) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2016.1244026 · Cited by 32
Stereotyping: The Multifactorial View
Puddifoot, K. (2017) · Philosophical Topics · doi:10.5840/philtopics20174518 · Cited by 32
Ethics in Human Biology: A Historical Perspective on Present Challenges
Radin, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045922 · Cited by 33
Woelders, S., & Abma, T. (2019) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750319837330 · Cited by 33
Godrie, B., Boucher, M., Bissonnette, S., Chaput, P., Flores, J., Dupéré, S., Gélineau, L., Piron, F., & Bandini, A. (2020) · Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement · doi:10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7110 · Cited by 32
White ignorance, race, and feminist politics in Sweden
Alinia, M. (2020) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2020.1775861 · Cited by 36
Three Models of Democratic Expertise
Moore, A. (2020) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592720002480 · Cited by 37
Primary Prevention of Dementia: An Ethical Review
Horstkötter, D., Deckers, K., & Köhler, S. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-201104 · Cited by 32
AAC Technology, Autism, and the Empathic Turn
van Grunsven, J., & Roeser, S. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1897189 · Cited by 32
Naming and disrupting epistemic injustice across curated sites of learning
Stroupe, D. (2021) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2021.1977647 · Cited by 36
Boncompagni, A. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108946513 · Cited by 32
The epistemic harms of empathy in phenomenological psychopathology
Spencer, L. J., & Broome, M. R. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09930-1 · Cited by 32
Coutellec, L. (2019) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.043.0381 · Cited by 32
Practical wisdom in complex medical practices: a critical proposal
Bontemps-Hommen, C. M. M. L., Baart, A., & Vosman, F. T. H. (2019) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-018-9846-x · Cited by 31
Conformism, Ignorance & Injustice: AI as a Tool of Epistemic Oppression
Miragoli, M. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.11 · Cited by 31
A Proposed Research Program for Social Epistemology
Goldberg, S. C. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856443.003.0003 · Cited by 31
FORMS OF DIFFERENTIAL SOCIAL INCLUSION
Wolff, J. (2017) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052517000085 · Cited by 31
Social epistemological conception of delusion
Miyazono, K., & Salice, A. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02863-1 · Cited by 31
Diehl, S. (2021) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12708 · Cited by 35
Prejudice in Testimonial Justification: A Hinge Account
Boncompagni, A. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.40 · Cited by 32
Challenging boundaries to expand frontiers in gender and policy studies
Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2022) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/030557321x16309516650101 · Cited by 35
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility
Levy, N. L. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2042420 · Cited by 31
Ritholtz, S. (2022) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2022.2099747 · Cited by 37
Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2022) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-022-01872-9 · Cited by 31
Bioethics and the Moral Authority of Experience
Nelson, R. H., Moore, B., Lynch, H. F., Waggoner, M. R., & Blumenthal‐Barby, J. (2022) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2127968 · Cited by 32
Injustice in Urban Sustainability
Kotsila, P., Anguelovski, I., Sekulova, F., & García‐Lamarca, M. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003221425 · Cited by 39
Anti-Black Medical Gaslighting in Healthcare: Experiences of Black Women in Canada
Boakye, P. N., Prendergast, N., Bailey, A., Sharon, M., Bandari, B., Odutayo, A.-A., & Brown, E. A. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/08445621241247865 · Cited by 31
The Gendered, Epistemic Injustices of Generative AI
Barry, I., & Stephenson, E. (2025) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2025.2480927 · Cited by 31
Situated ethics: Ethical accountability of local perspectives in global AI ethics
Mager, A., Eitenberger, M., Winter, J., Prainsack, B., Wendehorst, C. C., & Arora, P. (2025) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437251328200 · Cited by 36
Fact-Checking as Epistemic Infrastructure: From Journalistic Gatekeeping to Platform Governance
Shin, D., Perlmutter, D. D., Lim, J. S., & Jitkajornwanich, K. (2025) · Emerging Media · doi:10.1177/27523543251344972 · Cited by 31
EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE IN THE SPACE OF REASONS
Congdon, M. (2015) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2014.34 · Cited by 31
Altogether Now: A Virtue-Theoretic Approach to Pluralism in Feminist Epistemology
Daukas, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_3 · Cited by 32
Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.8 · Cited by 31
Refugees' Stories: Empathy, Agency, and Solidarity
Woods, K. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12307 · Cited by 31
Godrie, B., Boucher, M., Bissonnette, S., Chaput, P., Flores, J., Dupéré, S., Gélineau, L., Piron, F., & Bandini, A. (2020) · Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement · doi:10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6703 · Cited by 31
Brocklehurst, P. R., Baker, S. R., & Langley, J. (2020) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.12570 · Cited by 36
Revisiting (inclusive) education in the postcolony
Abdulrahman, H. K., Adebisi, F. I., Nwako, Z., & Walton, E. (2021) · Journal of the British Academy · doi:10.5871/jba/009s1.047 · Cited by 31
Conditions for mental health in education: Towards relational practice
Billington, T., Gibson, S., Fogg, P., Lahmar, J., & Cameron, H. (2021) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3755 · Cited by 31
“You are Not Qualified—Leave it to us”: Obstetric Violence as Testimonial Injustice
Shabot, S. C. (2021) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-021-09596-1 · Cited by 31
Rape Myths, Catastrophe, and Credibility
Tilton, E. C. R. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2022.5 · Cited by 31
Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review
Greenhalgh, T., Engebretsen, E., Bal, R. A., & Kjellström, S. (2023) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12656 · Cited by 38
Epistemic Injustice and Open‐Mindedness
Kwong, J. M. C. (2015) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12142 · Cited by 31
Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism
Borgerson, K. (2011) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0035-5 · Cited by 31
Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production
Arora‐Jonsson, S. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.020 · Cited by 31
Irwin, A. (2018) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026118782403 · Cited by 31
Socioculturally Attuned Family Therapy
McDowell, T., Knudson‐Martin, C., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_1093-1 · Cited by 31
Whose Knowledge is Valued? Epistemic Injustice in CSCW Applications
Ajmani, L. H., Foriest, J. C., Taylor, J., Pittman, K., Gilbert, S., & DeVito, M. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687062 · Cited by 30
Radical Moral Imagination: Courage, Hope, and Articulation
Biss, M. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12018 · Cited by 30
Network architectures supporting learnability
Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0323 · Cited by 31
Epistemic injustice in workplace hierarchies: Power, knowledge and status
Kwok, C. (2020) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453720961523 · Cited by 30
Genealogy, Evaluation, and Engineering
Queloz, M. (2022) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onac010 · Cited by 30
Brand, G., River, J., Molloy, R., Kemp, H., & Bellingham, B. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105616 · Cited by 30
Miller, E. C. A., Berland, L. K., & Campbell, T. (2023) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2023.2170793 · Cited by 30
The complexities of linguistic discrimination
Drożdżowicz, A., & Peled, Y. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2307993 · Cited by 30
An integrated conceptual model for enhancing refugee education
Miri, M. A. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.4005 · Cited by 32
Accounting scholarship and the Majority World: A case of epistemic injustice
Uddin, S. (2025) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2025.101679 · Cited by 30
Theorizing adultism: From adult domination to normative disempowerment
Wall, J. (2025) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/09075682251367184 · Cited by 30
Revisiting Rorty: Contributions to a Pragmatist Feminism
Dieleman, S. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01133.x · Cited by 30
Autonomy‐Denial in Objectification
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0011 · Cited by 30
God and Interpersonal Knowledge
Benton, M. A. (2018) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1666 · Cited by 32
Disruption, Self-Presentation, and Defensive Tactics at the Threshold of Learning
Gillespie, A. (2020) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268020914258 · Cited by 30
Pozzo, R., Filippetti, A., Paolucci, M., & Virgili, V. (2020) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa023 · Cited by 38
Confronting the Present: Archaeology in 2019
Rosenzweig, M. S. (2020) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13411 · Cited by 30
Steele, L. R., Swaffer, K., Carr, R., Phillipson, L., & Fleming, R. (2020) · Australian Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/1323238x.2020.1773671 · Cited by 30
Rowlands, J., & Wright, S. (2020) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1792523 · Cited by 30
Carrotte, E. R., Hartup, M. E., Lee‐Bates, B., & Blanchard, M. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.012 · Cited by 33
Satyal, P., Byskov, M. F., & Hyams, K. (2020) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2020.1824888 · Cited by 34
Misunderstanding vaccine hesitancy: A case study in epistemic injustice
Cassam, Q. (2021) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.2006055 · Cited by 30
Dirty Data Labeled Dirt Cheap: Epistemic Injustice in Machine Learning Systems
Hull, G. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09712-y · Cited by 32
Thompson, C. M., Babu, S., & Makos, S. (2023) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502231184318 · Cited by 33
Pismenny, A., Pismenny, A., Eickers, G., & PRINZ, J. J. (2024) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.5711 · Cited by 37
New Topics in Feminist Philosophy of Religion
Anderson, P. S. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6833-1 · Cited by 30
“African Know Thyself”: Epistemic Injustice and the Quest for Liberative Knowledge
Mungwini, P. (2017) · International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity · doi:10.1080/18186874.2017.1392125 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
