The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 12,257
Ruíz, E. (2020) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.33 · Cited by 86
Srinivasan, A. (2020) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-8311261 · Cited by 98
Third‐Order Thinking in Family Therapy: Addressing Social Justice Across Family Therapy Practice
McDowell, T., Knudson‐Martin, C., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2018) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12383 · Cited by 85
How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression
Rini, R. A. (2018) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2018.23 · Cited by 85
Linguistic Intervention and Transformative Communicative Disruptions
Sterken, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0020 · Cited by 85
Epistemic Injustice and the Attention Economy
Smith, L., & Archer, A. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10123-x · Cited by 85
Swanton, C. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198861676.001.0001 · Cited by 85
The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation
Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B. K., Macnaghten, P., & Leeuwis, C. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003112525 · Cited by 91
Ireson, J., Taylor, A., Richardson, E., Greenfield, B., & Jones, G. L. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13518 · Cited by 85
AI and Epistemic Agency: How AI Influences Belief Revision and Its Normative Implications
Coeckelbergh, M. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2466164 · Cited by 101
Emotional safety is patient safety
Lyndon, A., Davis, D., Sharma, A. E., & Scott, K. A. (2023) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015573 · Cited by 85
The ties that blind: making fee simple in the British Columbia treaty process
BLOMLEY, N. K. (2014) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12058 · Cited by 84
Rosen, L. T. (2021) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-021-00110-0 · Cited by 84
Zheng, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2023) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2023.2248968 · Cited by 84
Morreira, S. (2015) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/0021909615577499 · Cited by 96
Intellectual Humility, Confidence, and Argumentation
Kidd, I. J. (2015) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-015-9324-5 · Cited by 83
Alfano, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139696555 · Cited by 84
Social Psychology of and for World-Making
Power, S. A., Zittoun, T., Akkerman, S. F., Wagoner, B., Cabra, M., Cornish, F., Hawlina, H., Heasman, B., Mahendran, K., Psaltis, C., et al. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221145756 · Cited by 94
Coffey, M., Cohen, R., Faulkner, A., Hannigan, B., Simpson, A., & Barlow, S. H. (2016) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12474 · Cited by 83
Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
(2023) · Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3 · Cited by 82
Giladi, P. (2017) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453717707237 · Cited by 82
Moral Criticism and Structural Injustice
Zheng, R. (2020) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzaa098 · Cited by 82
Osborne, R. H., Cheng, C. C., Nolte, S., Elmer, S., Besançon, S., Budhathoki, S. S., Debussche, X., Dias, S., Kolarčík, P., Loureiro, M. I., et al. (2022) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009623 · Cited by 82
Transformative research as knowledge mobilization: Transmedia, bridges, and layers
Anderson, C., & McLachlan, S. M. (2015) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750315616684 · Cited by 81
Understanding Epistemic Trust Injustices and Their Harms
Grasswick, H. (2018) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246118000553 · Cited by 84
The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse
Keller, R., Hornidge, A., & Schünemann, W. J. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315170008 · Cited by 86
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Phillips, A. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316145555 · Cited by 80
Hens, K., Robeyns, I., & Schaubroeck, K. (2018) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12559 · Cited by 93
Sound Reasoning: Why Accent Bias Matters for Democratic Theory
Peled, Y., & Bonotti, M. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/701725 · Cited by 80
Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387 · Cited by 80
Decolonising Knowledge Here and Now
Mitova, V. (2020) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2020.1779606 · Cited by 89
Alcoff, L. M. (2022) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2127231 · Cited by 80
Moral Testimony: Transmission Versus Propagation
Hills, A. (2019) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12595 · Cited by 79
The Fourth Generation of Human Rights: Epistemic Rights in Digital Lifeworlds
Risse, M. (2021) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2020-0039 · Cited by 88
Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context
Palmer, C. G., Fry, A. H., Libala, N., Ralekhetla, M. M., Mtati, N., Weaver, M. J. T., Mtintsilana, Z., & Scherman, P. A. (2022) · Anthropocene · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320 · Cited by 79
Epistemic injustice in Climate Adaptation
Byskov, M. F., & Hyams, K. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10301-z · Cited by 79
Function-Based Conceptual Engineering and the Authority Problem
Queloz, M. (2022) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzac028 · Cited by 79
Tourism, global crises and justice: rethinking, redefining and reorienting tourism futures
Rastegar, R., Higgins‐Desbiolles, F., & Ruhanen, L. (2023) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2023.2219037 · Cited by 90
Grim, K., Tistad, M., Schön, U., & Rosenberg, D. (2019) · Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s40737-019-00145-9 · Cited by 78
Lorenzini, D. (2020) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2020.1712227 · Cited by 78
Dedding, C. W. M., Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W., & Abma, T. (2020) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2020.1743733 · Cited by 78
Academic Migration, Linguistic Justice, and Epistemic Injustice*
Catala, A. (2021) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12259 · Cited by 78
Blue Justice and the co-production of hermeneutical resources for small-scale fisheries
Schreiber, M. A., Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2022) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.104959 · Cited by 78
The coloniality of time in the global justice debate: de-centring Western linear temporality
Hunfeld, K. (2022) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2022.2052151 · Cited by 88
Linguistic justice and global English: theoretical and empirical approaches
Soler, J., & Morales‐Gálvez, S. (2022) · International Journal of the Sociology of Language · doi:10.1515/ijsl-2022-0026 · Cited by 78
The "decolonial turn": what does it mean for academic staff development?
Vorster, J.-A. (2017) · Education as Change · doi:10.17159/1947-9417/2017/853 · Cited by 78
Ignorance, Injustice and the Politics of Knowledge
Code, L. B. (2014) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2014.928186 · Cited by 77
Expanding transformative experience
Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2019) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12480 · Cited by 77
Terror, Hate and the Demands of Counter-Speech
Howard, J. W. (2019) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712341900053x · Cited by 79
Artificial intelligence and administrative evil
Young, M. M., Himmelreich, J., Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K.-C. (2021) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvab006 · Cited by 76
Anderson, L. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12240 · Cited by 76
Choosing Accommodations: Signed Language Interpreting and the Absence of Choice
Burke, T. B. (2017) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2017.0018 · Cited by 76
Credibility Excess and the Social Imaginary in Cases of Sexual Assault
Yap, A. (2017) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2017.4.1 · Cited by 76
Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women
Gonzales, L. D. (2018) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278 · Cited by 80
Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power
Archer, A., Cawston, A., Matheson, B., & Geuskens, M. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719002615 · Cited by 76
Österlin, C., & Raitio, K. (2020) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources9090104 · Cited by 76
Stohr, K. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190867522.003.0002 · Cited by 76
Unfair knowledge practices in global health: a realist synthesis
Abímbọ́lá, Ṣ., van de Kamp, J., Lariat, J., Rathod, L., Klipstein‐Grobusch, K., van der Graaf, R., & Bhakuni, H. (2024) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czae030 · Cited by 80
McKinnon, R. (2015) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.2015.92.2.12 · Cited by 80
Rance, J., & Treloar, C. (2014) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.05.002 · Cited by 76
Sandlos, J., & Keeling, A. (2015) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2015.06.005 · Cited by 76
Kerner, C., & Risse, M. (2021) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2020-0024 · Cited by 75
Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism
Chowdhury, R. R. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05229-4 · Cited by 88
BARIL, A. (2023) · Temple University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.5104041 · Cited by 77
Islamic Ethics and AI: An Evaluation of Existing Approaches to AI using Trusteeship Ethics
Ali, F., Bouzoubaa, K., Gelli, F., Hamzi, B., & Khan, S. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00922-4 · Cited by 75
Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships
Ho, A., & Quick, O. (2018) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0255-8 · Cited by 74
From academic to political rigour: Insights from the ‘Tarot’ of transgressive research
Temper, L., McGarry, D., & Weber, L. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106379 · Cited by 84
Museums and the Epistemology of Injustice: From Colonialism to Decoloniality
Vawda, S. (2019) · Museum International · doi:10.1080/13500775.2019.1638031 · Cited by 74
A critical reflexive politics of location, ‘feminist debt’ and thinking from the Global South
Madhok, S. (2020) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/1350506820952492 · Cited by 82
Epistemic Oppression and Ableism in Bioethics
Wieseler, C. (2020) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.38 · Cited by 74
The climate justice pillars vis-à-vis urban form adaptation to climate change: A review
Mohtat, N., & Khirfan, L. (2021) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100951 · Cited by 85
Toward a Harm-Based Account of Microaggressions
Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211017099 · Cited by 78
Knowing How to Feel: Racism, Resilience, and Affective Resistance
Rogers, T. (2021) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2021.47 · Cited by 74
Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact
Hutchison, K. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105552 · Cited by 74
Wren, B. (2019) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104518822694 · Cited by 73
Vice epistemology has a responsibility problem
Battaly, H. D. (2019) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12138 · Cited by 73
Analytic Theology and the Academic Study of Religion
Wood, W. D. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779872.001.0001 · Cited by 73
Kelp, C., & Simion, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009036818 · Cited by 73
Nath, R. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12686 · Cited by 73
Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain
Macgregor, C., Walumbe, J., Tulle, E., Seenan, C., & Blane, D. (2023) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/20494637231188583 · Cited by 73
Beyond experiential knowledge: a classification of patient knowledge
Dumez, V., & L’Espérance, A. (2024) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-024-00208-3 · Cited by 73
Sauer, H. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108529181 · Cited by 72
Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
Blease, C. R., Salmi, L., Rexhepi, H., Hägglund, M., & DesRoches, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107275 · Cited by 72
From Knowing to Doing: Guidelines for Socioculturally Attuned Family Therapy
Knudson‐Martin, C., McDowell, T., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12299 · Cited by 72
Wisdom revisited: a case study in normative theorizing
Tiberius, V., & Swartwood, J. D. (2011) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2011.594961 · Cited by 72
Healthcare Practice, Epistemic Injustice, and Naturalism
Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H. (2018) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246118000620 · Cited by 71
Expanding current understandings of epistemic injustice and dementia: Learning from stigma theory
Young, J. A., Lind, C., Orange, J. B., & Savundranayagam, M. Y. (2019) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.003 · Cited by 77
Structural health vulnerability: Health inequalities, structural and epistemic injustice
Chung, R. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12393 · Cited by 82
R’boul, H. (2020) · Journal of International and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/17513057.2020.1829676 · Cited by 71
Epistemic diversity and cross-cultural comparative research: ontology, challenges, and outcomes
Xu, X. (2021) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2021.1932438 · Cited by 71
Shields, M. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03454-4 · Cited by 71
Samzelius, T. (2020) · doi:10.24834/isbn.9789178771363 · Cited by 71
Social Meaning and Philosophical Method
Haslanger, S. (2013) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 70
Kilfoyle, E., Richardson, A. J., & MacDonald, L. D. (2013) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.08.001 · Cited by 70
Freeman, L. (2014) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhu046 · Cited by 70
Epistemic Justice and Democratic Legitimacy
Dieleman, S. (2015) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12173 · Cited by 76
Exploring the entry points for citizen science in urban sustainability initiatives
Colston, N. M., Vadjunec, J. M., & Wakeford, T. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.006 · Cited by 70
Puddifoot, K. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192845559.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Epistemic injustice and neoliberal imaginations in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) policy
Phyak, P. B., & Sah, P. K. (2022) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2022-0070 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
