The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,801–5,900 of 12,257
Inventing Archival Justice: Shola von Reinhold's LOTE and/as Queer Archival Praxis
Kuczyńska, Z. (2025) · Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies · doi:10.57132/jiss.411 · Cited by 1
Ist das Gegebene noch zu retten? Über Chancen und Gefahren einer Politisierung der Phänomenologie
Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2025) · Husserl Studies · doi:10.1007/s10743-025-09363-5 · Cited by 1
Symbolic Compliance as Masking Human Rights Abuses: Sex-based Harassment in Japanese Universities
Hattori, K., & Sugie, A. (2025) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-025-00741-2 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Injustice in Medical Contexts
Spencer, L. J., Byrne, E. A., & Kidd, I. J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_92-1 · Cited by 1
Nalwamba, D. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25960-9_140-1 · Cited by 1
Bureaucratic burdens and bureaucratic injustice
Go, J. J. (2025) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481251350479 · Cited by 1
On Three Kinds of Autobiographical Narrative Harm and Their Interactions
Rovetta, F. F. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10232-1 · Cited by 1
Hägele, R. (2025) · MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies · doi:10.1007/s40152-025-00435-y · Cited by 1
Toward a Socially Just Psychotherapy
Rafla, M. (2025) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2025.03.006 · Cited by 1
Delegitimizing Transphobic Views in Academia
Mitchell, L. (2025) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v30i4.4237 · Cited by 1
Violence and African Philosophy: Beyond Reaction and Mimicry
Sanni, J. S. (2025) · African Studies · doi:10.1080/00020184.2025.2530996 · Cited by 1
Acero, L. (2025) · Issues in Social Science · doi:10.5296/iss.v13i2.23041 · Cited by 1
Deliberating towards development: A framework for co-constructing policies with people in poverty
Osinski, A., Schutter, O. D., & Godinot, X. (2025) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107131 · Cited by 1
Güder, F. Z. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6192-5.ch001 · Cited by 1
de Barros, A. C., Lackie, E. R. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2025) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03163-w · Cited by 1
Davies, S. R. (2025) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-025-09590-2 · Cited by 1
Bateman, K. M., Kelly, G. J., Licona, P. R., & Cunningham, C. M. (2025) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70007 · Cited by 1
Bengson, J., Cuneo, T. D., & Shafer‐Landau, R. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198915140.003.0010 · Cited by 1
Monteith, E. A., & Kennedy, R. (2025) · a/b Auto/Biography Studies · doi:10.1080/08989575.2025.2534264 · Cited by 1
Flexible or Rigid? A Functionalist Approach to Epistemic Standards
Fischer, E., & Lossau, T. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2539121 · Cited by 1
The diagnostic role of emotions in feminist philosophy
Bortolami, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1622438 · Cited by 1
Teacher Educators in South Africa
Phuthi, B. (2025) · Education as Change · doi:10.25159/1947-9417/18734 · Cited by 1
Hedman, C., Lyngbäck, L. A., Paul, E., & Rosén, J. (2025) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2025.2545916 · Cited by 1
VII—Nietzschean Genealogy and Philosophical Methodology
Prescott‐Couch, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoaf006 · Cited by 1
Monrad, M. (2025) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/08861099251369825 · Cited by 1
Human Computers as Instruments
Creţu, A.-M. (2025) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2025.10109 · Cited by 1
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197815281.003.0004 · Cited by 1
No One Mourns the Wicked: The Ethics of Mourning Morally Flawed Celebrities
Isern‐Mas, C., Schaubroeck, K., & Archer, A. (2025) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.70015 · Cited by 1
The Cost of Credibility: Epistemic Injustice as a Useful Concept for Career Counselors
Smith, C. M., Whitson, N., Liu, Y., Guterres, K. M. P., AlSanea, A., & Blustein, D. L. (2025) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/08948453251376280 · Cited by 1
Mukwambo, P. (2025) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2025.2548817 · Cited by 1
The Mischaracterization of Restorative Justice: Claims, Limits, and Potential
Schiff, M., & Green, S. (2025) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaf077 · Cited by 1
Safeguarding Traditional Knowledge and Farmers' Rights
Pandey, A., & Mishra, A. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3927-6.ch013 · Cited by 1
Galan, M., Ottinger, G., & Karwat, D. M. A. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104319 · Cited by 1
Between Liberation and Oppression: Muslim Women, the Hijab, and the Liberal Feminist Gaze
Idrissi, K. E., Bouzar, A., & Ghourdou, T. (2025) · Journal of Gender Culture and Society · doi:10.32996/jgcs.2025.5.3.1 · Cited by 1
ECtHR jurisprudence amid political shifts: rolling back the protection against pushbacks
Klaus, W., & Kmak, M. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/13642987.2025.2552950 · Cited by 1
Villiger, D. (2025) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.70059 · Cited by 1
Rousseau, A. (2025) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980251368771 · Cited by 2
Clarke, J. (2025) · Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/02668734.2025.2541617 · Cited by 1
Alleviating Epistemic Injustice in Environmental Health Research: Strategies from Science and Values
Elliott, K. C. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10268-3 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Injustice in Medical Contexts
Spencer, L. J., Byrne, E. A., & Kidd, I. J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_92 · Cited by 1
Desire-led futures of anti-colonial methodologies
Zelada, I. A. (2025) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941251377275 · Cited by 2
Li, M. Y., Mata, C., & Nathan, K. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13202585 · Cited by 1
Löfgren-Mårtenson, L., & Lilja, M. (2025) · Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing · doi:10.18261/njsp.12.1.8 · Cited by 1
Rethinking Ethics for an Era of Trusted Computational Tools
Kostick, K. M., Hurley, M. E., Herrington, J. D., & Storch, E. A. (2025) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2025.08.016 · Cited by 2
de Araujo, I. A. A., & Madureira, A. F. D. A. (2025) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x251389925 · Cited by 2
Debes, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197829745.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Data roles: youth mental health outcome measures and the young people who defy them
McVey, R. J. (2025) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/s41292-025-00366-1 · Cited by 1
A Teoria da Mudança na Educação Inclusiva: uma revisão integrativa
Abrahão, A. L. B., Cunha, T., & Monteiro, R. F. B. L. (2025) · Ensaio Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação · doi:10.1590/s0104-40362025003304937 · Cited by 1
Tackling Linguistic Prejudice through Public Dialogue
Drummond, R., & Ryan, S. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.013.33 · Cited by 2
Anti-Trans, Anti-Gender, and Transphobic Language
Tudisco, J. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.013.37 · Cited by 1
Age, Ageism, and Ageist Language
MacDonald, C., Peoples, C., Inker, J., & Gendron, T. L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.013.19 · Cited by 1
Dryden, S., Wang, M., & Dovchin, S. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.013.16 · Cited by 1
The Oxford Handbook of Language and Prejudice
Ramjattan, V. A., Yu, T., Singh, J. N., Tudisco, J. J., Sauntson, H., Pearce, J., Setter, J., Arvaniti, A., Akanlig-Pare, G., (24095564), M. E., et al. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192869203.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Nouf-Latif, F. (2025) · Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s40737-025-00504-9 · Cited by 1
Mendelson, E. A., & Thompson, C. M. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502251384697 · Cited by 1
Reid, K., & Tseris, E. J. (2025) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535251387773 · Cited by 1
Weinberger, N. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100664 · Cited by 1
Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Precision Psychiatry
Vesterinen, T. (2025) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99654-2_8 · Cited by 1
Lived language and mobility: a case of young Iranians in Italy
Aliyar, M. (2025) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2025.2580570 · Cited by 1
Muchecheti, A. (2025) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/02610183251390268 · Cited by 1
Uncertainties of living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: barriers to treatment and its consequences
Surendran, G., & Jose, T. P. (2025) · International Journal of Health Promotion and Education · doi:10.1080/14635240.2025.2588191 · Cited by 1
Revisiting My Grandmother’s Garden: Christian Moral Imagination of Cohabitation
Jamir, S. (2025) · Arts · doi:10.3390/arts14060136 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Justice, Navigating a Moving Horizon
van Harten, A., Niessen, T., Koksma, J., & Abma, T. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251394112 · Cited by 1
Vargas, M. L., Fernández‐Baldor, Á., & Calabuig, C. (2025) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2025.2590496 · Cited by 1
Caring about queer-feminist artists on social media. Thinking with critical friendship
Lingg, S. (2025) · Image & Text · doi:10.17159/2617-3255/2025/n39a16 · Cited by 1
Not in the world: philosophy, anarchism and real alterity
Schneider, N. (2025) · Distinktion Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1080/1600910x.2025.2585043 · Cited by 1
Knowledge-specific epistemic injustice
Reibold, K. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2025.2590055 · Cited by 2
Mukmin, M. A., & Putri, L. G. S. (2025) · Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia · doi:10.23887/jfi.v8i3.92268 · Cited by 1
The paradox of participation: gender, autonomy, and suppression in academic science
Vuković, M. B., Maskalan, A., & Dremel, A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06305-6 · Cited by 1
Victim-Survivor Stories of Restorative Justice
Walklate, S. (2025) · The International Journal of Restorative Justice · doi:10.1163/25890905-00803002 · Cited by 1
Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Kültürel ve Dinî Kodları
Yıldız, İ. (2025) · Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi · doi:10.33708/ktc.1737217 · Cited by 1
Prompting, privilege, and pedagogy
McInnes, R., & Airey, L. (2025) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.65106/apubs.2025.2665 · Cited by 1
Huckerby, E. D., & Janack, M. (2025) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0487 · Cited by 1
Trust, Testimony, and the Epistemic Value of Historical Narrative
Tozzi, V. (2025) · História da Historiografia International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography · doi:10.15848/hh.v18.2336 · Cited by 1
Phenomenology of humiliation: feeling injustice in healthcare
Subramani, S. (2025) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2025-013288 · Cited by 1
I’ve Got Something to Say: A Photovoice Study With Women Who Have Experienced Violence
Hunt, M., Sadowski, C., & Cash, P. A. (2025) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/08861099251398836 · Cited by 1
Leinonen, M., Mieroop, D. V. D., & Stevanovic, M. (2025) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1002/symb.70034 · Cited by 1
Unlocking democracy: cultural dynamics in deliberation through the Venster99 case study
Paleviq, E. (2025) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2025.2590086 · Cited by 1
Moral Wrongs, Epistemic Wrongs: Epistemic Injustice as a Global Failure of Recognition
Álvarez, A. G. (2025) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537251407968 · Cited by 1
Implicit bias, epistemic injustice, and pragmatic stereotypes
Björkholm, S. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf030 · Cited by 1
Justiça informacional antirracista: Um olhar para a prática bibliotecária
da Silva, F. C. G., & Alves, A. P. M. (2025) · Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología · doi:10.17533/udea.rib.v48n3e360800 · Cited by 1
de Sain, A. M., Zomers, M. L., Ruis, C., Seute, T., & Janssens, A. I. W. A. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251381708 · Cited by 1
Transnational Climate Change Governance and the Postcolonial Appendices: The Case of the IPCC
Ahrens, J. (2025) · Kulturelle Figurationen: Artefakte, Praktiken, Fiktionen · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-49328-8_8 · Cited by 1
Meredith, M., Raymond, J., Anderson, K., Ellis, P., Englefield, C., Needham, I., Rudman, R., Stephenson, M., Woolridge, J., & Yeoman, A. (2025) · London Review of Education · doi:10.14324/lre.23.1.23 · Cited by 1
The phenomenon of hidden geographical information in cartography
Claramunt, C. (2025) · International Journal of Cartography · doi:10.1080/23729333.2025.2595717 · Cited by 1
Justice, for our children: using non-ideal theory to talk to children about injustice
Terlazzo, R. (2025) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267125100667 · Cited by 1
Mulvale, G. M., Green, J., Moll, S. E., Vackerberg, N., Robert, G., Larkin, M., Kjellström, S., Hossain, P., Bhaskar, L.-T., Lim, E., et al. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100688 · Cited by 1
le Roux, K., Ngoepe, M., & Shaw, C. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2025.2601559 · Cited by 1
Reginio, F. N., Ingilan, S. S., & Asrifan, A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3561-2.ch012 · Cited by 2
Ethical AI in Engineering Education
Merl, C., Guralnick, D. A., Dolezal, D., Posekany, A., & Koppensteiner, G. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2235-3.ch004 · Cited by 1
No safety without agency: Trauma-informed public involvement
Inge, E., Warner, G., & Aronsson, A. (2025) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000530 · Cited by 1
Márquez, E., & Allebrandt, S. L. (2025) · Innova Science Journal · doi:10.63618/omd/isj/v3/ne1/202 · Cited by 1
Gen AI for Research: Revolution or Risk?
Kolade, O., Egbetokun, A., & Owoseni, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02440-4_1 · Cited by 1
Sutton, G. (2026) · The politics of mental health and illness · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00377-5_3 · Cited by 1
Гаманюк, В. А., Bilozir, O. S., & Semerikov, S. O. (2026) · Educational Dimension · doi:10.31812/ed.836 · Cited by 1
Clavino, L. R. (2026) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.4610 · Cited by 1
The Epistemic Impact of Large Language Models on Policymaking
Feng, N., & Chandra, Y. (2026) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.70094 · Cited by 1
Chingombe, A. (2025) · Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.59915/jes.2025.si1.2 · Cited by 1
Stepanova, E., Cooper, M., Robinson, A., Harris, V., Rance, A., Husband, A., Wright, D. J., Lorencatto, F., Tolley, C. L., Tovey, W., et al. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70544 · Cited by 1
Researchers’ roles in co-research: From expert to “adaptive collaborator”
Åkerblom, K. B. (2026) · Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector · doi:10.18261/njips.4.1.4 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
