The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 6,001–6,100 of 12,257
Autistic Masking, Neurotypical Mindshaping, and Self-understanding
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Urbanek, A. (2026) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-026-00811-5 · Cited by 2
Toward a Kashmiri cultural psychology: Integrating indigenous knowledge and mental health
Sheikh, M. A. (2026) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.19475 · Cited by 1
How communicative trust shapes cognitive trust
Bernecker, S., & Grundmann, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1665595 · Cited by 1
From post-truth to post-reality: Ontology, epistemology, and education’s task of reality maintenance
Zagami, J. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2680893 · Cited by 1
Autistic psychiatrists' perspectives on mental healthcare for autistic people: A qualitative study
Doherty, M., Chown, N., Martin, N. C., Grosjean, B., Chaplin, E., & Shaw, S. C. K. (2026) · Psychiatry Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.psycom.2026.100281 · Cited by 1
From Hermeneutical Injustice to Collective Imagining: Troubling Feminist Co-Design in Women's Health
Forward, M., Porat, T., & Mougenot, C. (2026) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3789492.3796427 · Cited by 1
Diongue, D. M. L., Henriksson, R., Clifford-Holmes, J. K., Faye, S., Kane, A., Bassene, I., Saadi, H., Thiam, M., Niane, K., Bah, A., et al. (2026) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-17262-310232 · Cited by 1
Beidollahkhani, A. (2026) · Africa Spectrum · doi:10.1177/00020397261457156 · Cited by 1
Muir, D., McLarty, L., Drinkwater, J., Bennett, C., Birks, Y. F., Broadway‐Parkinson, A., Cooksey, V., Gleeson, P., Holland, C., Ledger, L., et al. (2025) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/gjsc0721 · Cited by 1
Beyond Binaries: Relational Reflexivity and the Fluidity of Positionality in Feminist Fieldwork
Sloane, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261458136 · Cited by 2
Humane democracy: Virtue ethics, artificial intelligence and merit-based governance
DEMİRKUŞ, N. (2026) · International Journal of Science and Research Archive · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2026.19.3.1338 · Cited by 1
Veale, J. F. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2026.2682499 · Cited by 1
Jonas, J. M. (2026) · Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.31756/jrsmte.514si · Cited by 1
Soffer-Vital, S. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2690517 · Cited by 1
Liu, T., & Qiao-Franco, G. (2026) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2026.2686138 · Cited by 1
Anjum, G., & Aziz, M. (2026) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.70078 · Cited by 1
Pedroza, L. D. C. G. (2026) · Letras (Lima) · doi:10.30920/letras.97.145.12 · Cited by 1
Ocriciano, M. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2026.2692702 · Cited by 1
Santiago, O. (2026) · Letras (Lima) · doi:10.30920/letras.97.145.14 · Cited by 1
Knowing the Border: Epistemic Friction and Irregular Crossings of the English Channel
Yemane, T. H., Mayblin, L., Alaydi, H., Shiker, Z. R., Malik, A., Matar, Y. H., Manochehry, B., Turner, J., Davies, T., & Isakjee, A. (2026) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261261459821 · Cited by 1
Misuse of Generative AI in Academic and Research Publishing
Tang, B. L. (2026) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-026-10074-8 · Cited by 1
Tensions as productive forces in coproduced mental health research: an explorative qualitative study
Gustafsson, A., Näslund, H., Markström, U., Allaskog, C., Jenneteg, F. G., Argentzell, E., Grim, K., & Svedberg, P. (2026) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-026-00934-0 · Cited by 1
Downs, J. L., Carnegie, A. C., Twitchell, M., Reed, B., Morris, D., Viljoen, D., Chawner, S. J. R. A., & Ayton, A. K. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01654-2 · Cited by 1
Vara-Horna, A., Avolio, B., & Rodríguez-Espartal, N. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70211 · Cited by 1
Nurlaily, N., Tan, D., Jaya, F., & Fatihah, N. (2025) · Vifada Assumption Journal of Law · doi:10.70184/ggab5b91 · Cited by 1
The gendered “stathetic” body: a scientifically informed philosophical approach to corporality
Córdoba, M., Labombarda, F., Dupré, J., Martínez, A. B., & Negretti-Borga, D. M. (2026) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-026-00743-4 · Cited by 1
Peer review and exclusionary practices: a critique from the Global South
Sanaullah (2026) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-01-2025-0006 · Cited by 1
Ekmekçioğlu, A. B. (2026) · Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32329/uad.1926583 · Cited by 1
Leonelli, S. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2682149 · Cited by 1
Liminal Intelligibility Among Chinese Young Gay Men in an Algorithmic Age
Luo, M., & Zhao, L. (2026) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051261465658 · Cited by 1
Violent Authenticity: Trans Women’s Experiences of Authentication
McBride, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84546-8_25-1 · Cited by 1
Magnell, E., & Dahl, N. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05698-4 · Cited by 1
Recognizing justice through neighbourhood scale planning in England
Parker, G., Lynn, T., Wargent, M., & Sturzaker, J. (2026) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2026.2696935 · Cited by 1
Otto, A., Bruyn, S. D., & Goris, B. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15070466 · Cited by 1
Unlearning modernity: remaking science education in the Anthropocene
Hurley, M., & Achiam, M. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-08221-9 · Cited by 1
Agential harms of chatbots: an ethical perspective
MirzaeiGhazi, S., & Osman, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01240-x · Cited by 2
Your Time, Whose Science? On Tempo Reviewability in Human Movement Research
Ramalho, A. L. G. (2026) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2026.2702355 · Cited by 1
Kpum, M. M., & Gasa, V. (2026) · International Journal of Studies in Psychology · doi:10.66434/ijspsy.v1i1si.445 · Cited by 1
The permacrisis prison: Why the carceral state is too fast to learn and too cyclical to change
Ismail, N. (2026) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/14624745261464440
MacLochlainn, J., McFadden, P., McGrory, S., McColgan, M., Naylor, R., McGinnis, E., McSherry, D., Martin, G., & Mallett, J. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag114 · Cited by 1
Maqutu, L. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03182-8 · Cited by 1
Developing Culturally Responsive AI for Indigenous Knowledge Preservation and Revitalization
Kuranga, C., Khumalo, A., & Masenya, T. M. (2026) · Mousaion South African Journal of Information Studies · doi:10.25159/2663-659x/20992 · Cited by 1
McQuillan, M. T., Lebovitz, B. A., Mayo, C., & Adelman, M. (2026) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x261462878 · Cited by 1
McEwan, K., Mäkelä, P., & Cheetham, M. (2026) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.1177/13607804261457148 · Cited by 1
Delusion Is Not a Bug: AI, Psychiatry, and the Ethics of Uncertainty
Carr, B. R. (2026) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.70045 · Cited by 1
Neimanas, N., & Dominguez, E. Y. (2026) · Journal of Community Practice · doi:10.1080/10705422.2026.2703567 · Cited by 1
Whitten, S. (2026) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-026-09568-6 · Cited by 1
Who Tells Whose Stories? Translation Dilemmas and Epistemic Injustice in Insider Research
Sivaji, S. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261469123 · Cited by 1
Cobbaert, L., & Elwyn, R. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01719-2 · Cited by 2
Tracing deaf studies and deaf education: insights from JDSDE’s three decades
Doğan, M., Çolaklıoğlu, O., Akkaya, E., Kılıç, M., & GENÇ, A. (2026) · The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/jdsade/enag048 · Cited by 1
Tinner, L., Rigby, E., & Curbelo, A. A. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261468332 · Cited by 1
Castellanelli, C. A., Parra, C., & Pires, A. D. R. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2711849 · Cited by 1
Hasbi, Y., Saputra, F., Iskandar, H., & Asmara, R. (2026) · MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM · doi:10.14710/mmh.55.1.2026.47-81 · Cited by 1
Hoffman, K., Spencer, H., Rodriguez, S. R., Alías-Ferri, M., Friedrich, D., Wilson, B., Stauffer, C. S., & Morgan, D. L. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261475803 · Cited by 1
Beyond Interruption: Care, Epistemic Distance and the Temporal Politics of Academic Value
Almeida, P. A. (2026) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2026.2712251 · Cited by 1
Tyler, R. (2026) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v16i1.1847 · Cited by 1
When leadership becomes epistemic: paradoxes of educational leadership in AI-mediated systems
Balázs, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1919644 · Cited by 1
Are things getting better for women with learning disabilities in secure services?
Fish, R., & Jones, H. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2712583 · Cited by 1
Cross-Lingual Bias in Educational Feedback Research: Making AI Mediation Visible
Ducasse, A. M., & Caño, E. (2026) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906261467895 · Cited by 1
Dittmar, E. C., & Sposato, M. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70145 · Cited by 1
Cologon, K., & Mevawalla, Z. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2712577 · Cited by 1
Recognition as Normative Orientation: Structure, Mediation, and Repair
Huda, K. A. S. M. N. (2026) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-026-09788-5 · Cited by 1
Plata‐Casas, L. I., & Reyes, A. C. D. (2026) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.10071 · Cited by 1
Riggare, S. S., Christiansen, T. B., Larsen, J. E., Jonas, S., Wolf, G., & de Groot, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1736850 · Cited by 1
Manomenidis, G., Orfanidou, C., Kleisiaris, C. F., Karavasileiadou, S., Kazakou, P., Nikiforou, A., & Georgousopoulou, V. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14162629 · Cited by 1
Candraningrum, D. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261480525 · Cited by 1
Diallo, N. A., Molot, J., Bray, R. I., Trifunovski, A., & Peris, R. (2026) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph23081076 · Cited by 1
Equality in Online Deliberation: Can Argument Mapping Facilitation Make Every Voice Count?
Khoban, Z., Meloni, M., Mestre, R., Ryan, M. E., & Spada, P. (2026) · Information Polity · doi:10.1177/15701255261468092 · Cited by 1
LingyuKong, & Seong, D. (2026) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-026-02926-5 · Cited by 1
Peng, Y., Patfield, S., & Gore, J. M. (2026) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2026.2723121 · Cited by 1
Nsengimana, V., Mugume, P. J., Nzibaza, V., Weaver, M. J. T., Nzarora, A., Tanner, J., Kaplin, B. A., & Palmer, C. (2026) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-17598-310315 · Cited by 1
Palmer, D. A. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261483529 · Cited by 1
The golden thread of AI subalternity: epistemic activism
Garcia, I. K. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01318-6 · Cited by 1
Rebooting artificial intelligence: Insurgent Afrofuturism and speculative design
Sharma, S., Shervington, A., & Aleem, J. (2026) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517261473375 · Cited by 1
Retis, J., Barnett, S., & Ruelas, L. L. (2026) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990261474173 · Cited by 1
Bramora, P. J., & Pilis, W. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10395-7 · Cited by 1
Bekele, R. D., Moen, A., Belina, M., Saranto, K., & Berhane, K. T. (2026) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2026.1885894 · Cited by 1
Nitchals, C. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01379-7 · Cited by 1
Looking back to look ahead: a BERTopic-assisted scoping review of Medical Humanities (2000–2025)
Yin, L. (2026) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2025-013682 · Cited by 1
The dilemmas of Asia-as-Method: should the hermeneutical underdogs in Asia do Asia-as-Method?
Lee, K. Y. (2026) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-026-10149-3 · Cited by 1
Lyzcia, E. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100889 · Cited by 1
de Menezes, V. I., Zanata, E. M., & Capellini, V. L. M. F. (2026) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2026.2676147 · Cited by 1
Impartial Benevolence and Partial Love
Chappell, S. G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684854.003.0005 · Cited by 1
The Erasure of Empowered Gossip in Academia
Adkins, K. (2014) · Nouvelle Revue Synergies Canada · doi:10.21083/nrsc.v0i7.3038 · Cited by 1
Problematizing the Monolingual Norm in a Multidialectal City
Liang, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12619-7_9 · Cited by 1
Radden, J. H. (2013) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12013 · Cited by 1
Studying While Black: Trust, Disrespect , and Opportunity
Haslanger, S. (2012) · Cited by 1
Democratic justice and contractarian injustice
Bufacchi, V. (2016) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1183758 · Cited by 1
Vor-Urteile und Menschenbilder
Schües, C. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14686-3_15 · Cited by 1
Maloney, C. (2016) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2016.2.7 · Cited by 1
Foucault’s Sad Heterotopology of the Body
Erlenbusch-Anderson, V. (2016) · philoSOPHIA · doi:10.1353/phi.2016.0018 · Cited by 1
Introduction: Some Loose Talk About Gossip
Adkins, K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47840-1_1 · Cited by 1
THE POSSIBILITY OF THICK LIBERTARIANISM
Christmas, B. (2016) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 1
After the Kantian Analytic/Synthetic Contrast: Social Epistemology from Hegel to Derrida and Fricker
Burke, V. I. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1346723 · Cited by 1
Analyzing the Wrongfulness of Lying: A Defence of Pluralism
Falbo, A. (2017) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217317000579 · Cited by 1
Parrhesia e injusticias epistémicas / Parrhesia and epistemic injustices
Gallego, G. L. (2017) · Bajo Palabra · doi:10.15366/bp2017.17.015 · Cited by 1
Epistemic justice as a virtue in hermeneutic psychotherapy
Samaržija, S. P., & Miškulin, I. (2017) · Filozofija i drustvo · doi:10.2298/fid1704063p · Cited by 1
Cardone, R. (2015) · Glocalism Journal of Culture Politics and Innovation · doi:10.12893/gjcpi.2015.1.1 · Cited by 1
Simionca, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76273-9_5 · Cited by 1
Dlamini, N. P., & Kamwendo, G. H. (2018) · International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity · doi:10.1080/18186874.2018.1479873 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
