Cited by 71Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Systematic Reviews of Mindfulness and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: Should we be using Third Wave Therapies?

Byrne, Simon P, Haber, Paul, Baillie, Andrew, Costa, Daniel S J, Fogliati, Vincent, Morley, Kirsten·2019·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: Third wave therapies have shown efficacy for treating emotional disorders and potential for treating substance use disorders. There is developing interest in whether they can more specifically be used for treating alcohol use disorders (AUDs). We were interested in whether third wave therapies have value alongside current evidence-based psychosocial treatments for AUDs. METHOD: We conducted systematic reviews of third wave therapies for AUDs. We searched PsycINFO, Embase and Medline for peer reviewed journal articles where mindfulness or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) were used to treat adults with AUDs or alcohol use that caused impairment. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies where mindfulness was used for treating AUDs and 6 where ACT was used for AUDs. The studies identified included RCTs, non-randomized controlled studies and uncontrolled studies. We found preliminary support that both third wave therapies are better than no treatment, treatments of minimal efficacy, as well as some evidence they are comparable to effective psychosocial treatments for AUDs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude ACT and mindfulness provide an alternative to existing treatments, particularly for patients who have not responded to, or have disengaged from, standard treatments. We also found some evidence ACT and mindfulness are useful for comorbid mental health conditions. Yet while these results are promising, further research is needed to determine their utility, ideally employing randomized-controlled designs, larger clinical samples and longer follow-ups. Furthermore, few studies in this review directly compared third wave therapies to first line treatments, making it difficult to determine their relative efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agy089

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byrne, S. P., Haber, P., Baillie, A., Costa, D. S. J., Fogliati, V., & Morley, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The Sydney ACT Centre, 44 Bridge St, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Corresponding author
Byrne, Simon P
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2019-02-23
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
159-166
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2916257005
Cited by
71
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
alcoholism, mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy, third-wave therapies, psychosocial interventions, treatment efficacy, psychiatric comorbidity, treatment non-response
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Humans, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review