Cited by 108Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Treating Inpatients With Comorbid Depression and Alcohol Use Disorders: A Comparison of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual

Petersen, Connie L., Zettle, Robert D.·2009·The Psychological Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03395679

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of its transdiagnostic nature, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy can effectively target common comorbid psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety.

    “Because of the transdiagnostic nature of ACT, it can effectively target common comorbid psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety.85–87”
  • Petersen and Zettle (2009) found significant effects of ACT for inpatients (n=12) with comorbid depressive and substance abuse disorders, whereas ACT was not superior to treatment as usual.

    “Petersen and Zettle (2009) found significant effects of ACTforinpatients ( n =12)withcomorbiddepressive and substance abuse disorders, whereas ACT was not superior to a treatment as usual condition.”
  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy has been recognized as an efficacious treatment for depression and has shown promising results in secondary prevention of depression.

    “ACT has been recognized as an efficacious treatment for depression and has also shown promising results in the secondary prevention of depression (e.g., [8–12]).”
  • The alternative focus on improving DD by decreasing the aversiveness of the present moment is strengthened with significant effects on behavior, such as food behaviors, addictive behaviors, and other mental and physical health problems.

    “this alternative focus on improving DD by decreasing the aversiveness of the present moment is strengthened with significant effects on behavior, such as food behaviors”

    From Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Petersen & Zettle, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, C. L., & Zettle, R. D.
Affiliations
Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zettle, Robert D.
Venue
The Psychological Record
Published
2009-10
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
521-536
ISSN
  • 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-3452
OpenAlex
W94193703
Cited by
108
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
  • OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, comorbid depression, alcoholism, inpatient care, 12-step programs, experiential avoidance, usual care, individual psychotherapy, involuntary admission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review