Cited by 248Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Stress-Induced Dendritic Remodeling in the Prefrontal Cortex is Circuit Specific

Open access
Shansky, R. M., Hamo, C., Hof, P. R., McEwen, B. S., Morrison, J. H.·2009·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Chronic stress exposure has been reported to induce dendritic remodeling in several brain regions, but it is not known whether individual neural circuits show distinct patterns of remodeling. The current study tested the hypothesis that the projections from the infralimbic (IL) area of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA), a pathway relevant to stress-related mental illnesses like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, would have a unique pattern of remodeling in response to chronic stress. The retrograde tracer FastBlue was injected into male rats' BLA or entorhinal cortex (EC) 1 week prior to 10 days of immobilization stress. After cessation of stress, FastBlue-labeled and unlabeled IL pyaramidal neurons were loaded with fluorescent dye Lucifer Yellow to visualize dendritic arborization and spine density. As has been previously reported, randomly selected (non-FastBlue-labeled) neurons showed stress-induced dendritic retraction in apical dendrites, an effect also seen in EC-projecting neurons. In contrast, BLA-projecting neurons showed no remodeling with stress, suggesting that this pathway may be particularly resilient against the effects of stress. No neurons showed stress-related changes in spine density, contrasting with reports that more dorsal areas of the mPFC show stress-induced decreases in spine density. Such region- and circuit-specificity in response to stress could contribute to the development of stress-related mental illnesses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhp003

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stress reduces dendrites in mPFC neurons involved with cortical-cortical processing but increases dendrites in mPFC neurons that project to and excite amygdala actions.

    “An elegant study by Shansky and colleagues showed that stress reduces dendrites in mPFC neurons involved with cortical-cortical processing, but increases dendrites in the mPFC neurons that project to and excite amygdala actions.25”

    From Chronic Stress Weakens Connectivity in the Prefrontal Cortex: Architectural and Molecular Changes. (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results section reports dendritic retraction in randomly selected and entorhinal-cortex-projecting mPFC neurons, supporting the first part of the sentence. But it reports no stress-related increase—or other remodeling—in neurons projecting to the basolateral amygdala. The Introduction also says that stimulation of this pathway suppresses amygdala output, rather than exciting amygdala actions. The indexed copy provides no page number for the Results passage. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Elevated glutamatergic transmission within discrete anatomical circuits may explain the targeted nature of gray matter changes within mood disorders.

    “Elevated glutamatergic transmission within discrete anatomical circuits also may explain the targeted nature of gray matter changes within mood disorders (eg, affecting left more than right sgACC) (McEwen and Magarinos, 2001;Drevets and Price, 2005a;Shansky et al, 2009).”

    From Neurocircuitry of Mood Disorders (2010) · cites this paper as Shansky et al, 2009

    The Abstract reports circuit-specific dendritic remodeling after stress in rats, and the Functional Implications section suggests that a spared pathway might receive increased input and become overstimulated (page numbers not supplied). The paper does not establish elevated glutamatergic transmission as the cause of targeted gray-matter changes in mood disorders, nor does it address left–right differences in the sgACC. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The infralimbic cortex is involved in coping with chronic stress, eventually leading to structural changes and prefrontal dysfunction.

    “The most ventral subdomain of the mPFC is the infralimbic cortex (IL) and is involved in coping with chronic stress eventually leading to structural changes and prefrontal dysfunction [5–11].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction describes the infralimbic cortex as part of a circuit that regulates amygdala activity, and the study reports chronic-stress-induced dendritic retraction in some infralimbic neurons. But the Abstract reports no remodeling in neurons projecting to the basolateral amygdala, while the Functional Implications section treats resulting circuit dysfunction as a possibility for future study, not an established consequence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chronic exposure to uncontrollable stress causes loss of spines and dendrites in the prefrontal cortex (PFC).

    “Chronic exposure to uncontrollable stress causes loss of spines and dendrites in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), a recently evolved brain region that provides top-down regulation of thought, action, and emotion.”

    From Chronic Stress Weakens Connectivity in the Prefrontal Cortex: Architectural and Molecular Changes. (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (page not provided) reports dendritic retraction after chronic stress in rats, and the spine-density Results section reports prior findings of spine loss in two medial PFC regions. But this study found no spine-density loss in the infralimbic region and no dendritic remodeling in one circuit. The claim omits that regional and circuit specificity and calls the stress “uncontrollable,” whereas the paper describes its protocol as immobilization stress. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even within the PFC, there are circuit-specific alterations that lead to amygdala dominance with chronic stress: the subset of PFC neurons that activate the amygdala do not atrophy during stress (indeed, in females, these dendrites can be extended with stress), while the PFC neurons engaged in cortico-cortical connections show the expected loss of dendritic material.

    “Even within the PFC, there are circuit-specific alterations that lead to amygdala dominance with chronic stress: the subset of PFC neurons that activate the amygdala do not atrophy during stress (indeed, in females, these dendrites can be extended with stress), while the PFC neurons engaged in cortico-cortical connections show the expected loss of dendritic material73.”

    From Stress weakens prefrontal networks: molecular insults to higher cognition (2015) · cites this paper as [73]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Paxinos G, Watson C. 2005. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 5th ed. New York: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shansky, R. M., Hamo, C., Hof, P. R., McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2009-02-04
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
2479-2484
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2095787168
Cited by
248
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-58911, P50MH058911, MH075506, F32MH075506)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
chronic stress, dendritic remodeling, medial prefrontal cortex, infralimbic cortex, basolateral amygdala, entorhinal cortex, dendritic spine density, dendritic retraction, stress resilience, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Dendrites, Fluorescent Dyes, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Restraint, Physical, Stress, Physiological, Prefrontal Cortex, Microscopy, Confocal, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review