The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?*
Abstract
Associations between modifiable exposures and disease seen in observational epidemiology are sometimes confounded and thus misleading, despite our best efforts to improve the design and analysis of studies. Mendelian randomization—the random assortment of genes from parents to offspring that occurs during gamete formation and conception—provides one method for assessing the causal nature of some environmental exposures. The association between a disease and a polymorphism that mimics the biological link between a proposed exposure and disease is not generally susceptible to the reverse causation or confounding that may distort interpretations of conventional observational studies. Several examples where the phenotypic effects of polymorphisms are well documented provide encouraging evidence of the explanatory power of Mendelian randomization and are described. The limitations of the approach include confounding by polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with the polymorphism under study, that polymorphisms may have several phenotypic effects associated with disease, the lack of suitable polymorphisms for studying modifiable exposures of interest, and canalization—the buffering of the effects of genetic variation during development. Nevertheless, Mendelian randomization provides new opportunities to test causality and demonstrates how investment in the human genome project may contribute to understanding and preventing the adverse effects on human health of modifiable exposures. Genetic epidemiology—the theme of this issue of the International Journal of Epidemiology—is seen by many to be the only future for epidemiology, perhaps reflecting a growing awareness of the limitations of observational epidemiology1 (Box 1). Genetic epidemiology is concerned with understanding heritable aspects of disease risk, individual susceptibility to disease, and ultimately with contributing to a comprehensive molecular understanding of pathogenesis. The massive investment and expansion of human genetics, if it is to return value for the common good, must be integrated into public health functions. The human genome epidemiology network (HuGE Net—http://www.cdc.gov/genetics/huge.htm) has been established to promote the use of genetic knowledge—in terms of genetic tests and services—for disease prevention and health promotion.2,3 A broad taxonomy of human genome studies of public health relevance has been developed4 (Box 2). In this issue of the IJE, we publish a paper by Miguel Porta,5 who highlights the need for a more rational approach to genetic testing, given the likely low penetrance of many genes associated with cancers,6 likening the role of the genome to a jazz score that is interpreted and developed through experience and context—and is seldom predictable. Such insights may well temper enthusiasm for genetic testing in populations. However, in parallel to the approaches advocated by HuGE, genetic epidemiology can lead to a more robust understanding of environmental determinants of disease (e.g. dietary factors, occupational exposures, and health-related behaviours) relevant to whole populations (and not simply to genetically susceptible sub-populations).7–10 This approach has recently been referred to as ‘Mendelian randomization’.11–15 Here we begin by briefly reviewing reasons for current concerns about aetiological findings generated by conventional observational epidemiology and then we outline the potential contribution (and limitations) of Mendelian randomization. ‘Epidemiology set to get fast-track treatment’ ‘A consortium of leading European research centres and pharmaceutical companies will this week announce a plan to transform epidemiology by combining it with the new techniques of high-throughput biology. They plan to create a new field of study—genomic epidemiology—by using screening technologies derived from the human genome project … We think it is important to expand classical epidemiology and genetic epidemiology to take it to this high-throughput mode, says Esper Boel, vice-president of biotechnology research at Novo Nordisk. We want to use post-genomic technologies to create a new clinical science, to turn functional genomics into real clinical chemistry.’ From: Butler D. Epidemiology set to get fast-track treatment. Nature 2001;414:139. Reprinted with permission. Surveillance Population frequency of gene variants predisposing to specific diseases Population frequency of morbidity and mortality from such diseases Population frequency and effects of environmental factors known to interact with gene variants Economic costs of genetic components of diseases Coverage, access, and uptake of genetic tests and services Aetiology Magnitude of disease risk associated with gene variants in different populations Contribution of gene variants to the overall level of disease in different populations Magnitude of disease risk associated with gene–gene and gene–environment interactions in different populations Heal
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The essence of an MR design is that the association between a genetic variant (G) and an outcome (Y) can be used to test whether and by how much the exposure of interest (X) influences the outcome, provided that the genetic variant is associated with the exposure of interest and has no other source of association with the outcome.1,9”
From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“When initially presented, it was concluded that “[MR] offers a more robust approach to understanding the effect of some modifiable exposures on health outcomes than does much conventional observational epidemiology”1 and that where possible, RCTs should follow to establish the effects of interventions. This conclusion remains unchanged, although moving towards formal triangulation of all pertinent”
From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Canalization can occur when polymorphic phenotypes expressed during fetal development lead to the development of compensating pathways to mitigate the effects of that expression. 1,178,179”
From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Estimating effect sizes through the instrumental variable approach imposes a fourth assumption, usually homogeneity of effects of the exposure on the outcome.16 58 59 60”
From Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology using Mendelian Randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Most MR studies rely on three core IV assumptions (relevance, independence, and exclusion restriction; fig 1, box 3) to carry out testing for causal effects of the exposure on the outcome.16”
From Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology using Mendelian Randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, violation of the ‘exclusion restriction criteria’33–37 could bias causal estimates in IV analyses when used to test effects of intermediates in RCTs or when used in observational data (including MR)”
From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“but may be confounded by population stratification.33,34”
From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Human genetics can provide compelling evidence of causation through approaches such as Mendelian randomization (MR).”
From Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Performed well, such studies called Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, can provide rigorous evidence of causation 9,10 .”
From Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“We can exploit the properties of the human genome (specifically, the random segregation of alleles and their non-modifiable nature) to make causal inferences about the relationships between risk factors and disease 10 .”
From Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants, assumed to be instrumental variables for a particular exposure, to estimate the causal effect of that exposure on an outcome.”
From Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways. (2015) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“If the instrumental variable criteria are satisfied, the resulting estimator is consistent even in the presence of unmeasured confounding and reverse causation.”
From Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways. (2015) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
OLSSON, A. G., McMurray, J. J. V., Thorgeirsson, G., Spaulding, C. M., Slattery, J., Pyörälà, K., Færgeman, O., Wright, R. S., Berg, K. M., Wilhelmsen, L., et al. (1994) · The Lancet · Cited by 8,467
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia
Shepherd, J., Cobbe, S. M., Ford, I., Isles, C. G., Lorimer, A. R., Macfarlane, P. W., McKillop, J. H., & Packard, C. J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511163332001 · Cited by 7,449
Collaboration, A. T. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71 · Cited by 6,943
(1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404143301501 · Cited by 4,737
Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R. E., & Ewens, W. J. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 3,679
Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease
Omenn, G. S., Goodman, G. E., Thornquist, M. D., Balmes, J., Cullen, M. R., Glass, A., Keogh, J. P., Meyskens, F. L., Valanis, B., Williams, J. H., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605023341802 · Cited by 3,638
SCANDINAVIANSIMVASTATINSURVIVAL (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90566-5 · Cited by 3,638
Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study
(1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-a · Cited by 3,472
CANALIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERS
WADDINGTON, C. H. (1942) · Nature · doi:10.1038/150563a0 · Cited by 3,255
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Skrabanek P. False Premises, False Promises. Whithorn: Tarragon Press, 2000.
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim (accessed 12 Dec 2002).
- Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF heart protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals. Lancet2002;360:7–22. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., & Burgess, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv080 · Cited by 9,816
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C., & Burgess, S. (2016) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21965 · Cited by 8,922
Verbanck, M., Chen, C.-Y., Neale, B., & Do, R. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7 · Cited by 8,591
The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome
Hemani, G., Zheng, J., Elsworth, B., Wade, K. H., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Laurin, C., Burgess, S., Bowden, J., Langdon, R., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34408 · Cited by 7,959
Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data
Burgess, S., Butterworth, A., & Thompson, S. G. (2013) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21758 · Cited by 6,050
Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
Davey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu328 · Cited by 4,677
Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3034 · Cited by 4,618
Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2017) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x · Cited by 4,571
Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians
Davies, N. M., Holmes, M. V., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k601 · Cited by 4,404
An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
ReproGen Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., Gusev, A., Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Duncan, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3406 · Cited by 4,255
Skrivankova, V. W., Richmond, R. C., Woolf, B. A. R., Yarmolinsky, J., Davies, N. M., Swanson, S. A., VanderWeele, T. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Timpson, N. J., Dimou, N., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.18236 · Cited by 3,994
Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
Burgess, S., Thompson, S. G., & CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr036 · Cited by 3,952
10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation
Visscher, P. M., Wray, N. R., Zhang, Q., Sklar, P., McCarthy, M. I., Brown, M. A., & Yang, J. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005 · Cited by 3,719
Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets
Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Hu, H., Bakshi, A., Robinson, M. R., Powell, J. E., Montgomery, G. W., Goddard, M. E., Wray, N. R., Visscher, P. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3538 · Cited by 3,352
Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption
Hartwig, F. P., Davey Smith, G., & Bowden, J. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx102 · Cited by 3,485
eQTLGen, Wray, N. R., 23andMe, the Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Ripke, S., Mattheisen, M., Trzaskowski, M., Byrne, E. M., Abdellaoui, A., Adams, M. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3 · Cited by 3,005
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.
Hemani, G., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 · Cited by 2,607
Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort
Fraser, A., Macdonald-Wallis, C., Tilling, K., Boyd, A., Golding, J., Davey Smith, G., Henderson, J., Macleod, J., Molloy, L., Ness, A., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys066 · Cited by 2,494
Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies
Gusev, A., Ko, A., Shi, H., Bhatia, G., Chung, W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Jansen, R., de Geus, E. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., Wright, F. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3506 · Cited by 2,479
Sanderson, E., Glymour, M. M., Holmes, M. V., Kang, H., Morrison, J., Munafò, M. R., Palmer, T., Schooling, C. M., Wallace, C., Zhao, Q., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5 · Cited by 2,229
Yavorska, O. O., & Burgess, S. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx034 · Cited by 2,029
Life course epidemiology: Figure 1
Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J., & Power, C. (2003) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.57.10.778 · Cited by 2,019
Burgess, S., Bowden, J., Fall, T., Ingelsson, E., & Thompson, S. G. (2017) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000559 · Cited by 2,017
Owen, M. J., Sawa, A., & Mortensen, P. B. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01121-6 · Cited by 1,870
A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two‐sample summary data Mendelian randomization
Bowden, J., Del Greco M, F., Minelli, C., Davey Smith, G., Sheehan, N., & Thompson, J. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7221 · Cited by 1,887
2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults
Greenland, P., Alpert, J. S., Beller, G. A., Benjamin, E. J., Budoff, M. J., Fayad, Z. A., Foster, E., Hlatky, M. A., Hodgson, J. M., Kushner, F. G., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182051b4c · Cited by 1,976
Resilience as a dynamic concept
Rutter, M. (2012) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579412000028 · Cited by 1,853
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations
Burgess, S., Smith, G. D., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., Relton, C. L., et al. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.1 · Cited by 1,828
Genome-wide association studies
Uffelmann, E., Huang, Q. Q., Munung, N. S., de Vries, J., Okada, Y., Martin, A. R., Martin, H. C., Lappalainen, T., & Posthuma, D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00056-9 · Cited by 1,849
EPIC- InterAct Consortium, Burgess, S., Scott, R. A., Timpson, N. J., Davey Smith, G., & Thompson, S. G. (2015) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-015-0011-z · Cited by 1,803
A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization
Burgess, S., Small, D. S., & Thompson, S. G. (2015) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215597579 · Cited by 1,769
Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.
Brion, M.-J. A., Shakhbazov, K., & Visscher, P. M. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyt179 · Cited by 1,751
Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
Greco M, F. D., Minelli, C., Sheehan, N. A., & Thompson, J. R. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6522 · Cited by 1,700
Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
Bowden, J., & Holmes, M. V. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1346 · Cited by 1,683
Skrivankova, V. W., Richmond, R. C., Woolf, B. A. R., Davies, N. M., Swanson, S. A., VanderWeele, T. J., Timpson, N. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Dimou, N., Langenberg, C., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2233 · Cited by 1,648
Smith, K. P., & Christakis, N. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601 · Cited by 1,638
Bias due to participant overlap in two‐sample Mendelian randomization
Burgess, S., Davies, N. M., & Thompson, S. G. (2016) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21998 · Cited by 1,624
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu283 · Cited by 1,605
Bowden, J., Fabiola Del Greco, M., Minelli, C., Smith, G. D., Sheehan, N. A., & Thompson, J. R. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw220 · Cited by 1,555
An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites
The Multiple Tissue Human Expression Resource (MuTHER) Consortium, Shin, S.-Y., Fauman, E. B., Petersen, A.-K., Krumsiek, J., Santos, R., Huang, J., Arnold, M., Erte, I., Forgetta, V., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2982 · Cited by 1,515
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy163 · Cited by 1,496
“In these cases, extending the analogy to RCTs, each instrumenting SNP is considered an independent experiment (in the sense that they independently modify the exposure), and as such the results from each experiment can be meta-analysed to give an overall estimate (7,46,47).”
MethodGenetic Mapping in Human Disease
Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Lander, E. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156409 · Cited by 1,452
Homocysteine Lowering and Cardiovascular Events after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Bønaa, K. H., Njølstad, I., Ueland, P. M., Schirmer, H., Tverdal, A., Steigen, T., Wang, H., Nordrehaug, J. E., Arnesen, E., & Rasmussen, K. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055227 · Cited by 1,442
Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Kamstrup, P. R. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.801 · Cited by 1,357
2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults
Greenland, P., Alpert, J. S., Beller, G. A., Benjamin, E. J., Budoff, M. J., Fayad, Z. A., Foster, E., Hlatky, M. A., Hodgson, J. M., Kushner, F. G., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001 · Cited by 1,348
Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors
Palmer, T. M., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sheehan, N. A., Tobias, J. H., Timpson, N. J., Smith, G. D., & Sterne, J. A. (2012) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280210394459 · Cited by 1,289
Burgess, S., Dudbridge, F., & Thompson, S. G. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6835 · Cited by 1,153
Houle, D., Govindaraju, D. R., & Omholt, S. W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2897 · Cited by 1,319
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations
Burgess, S., Davey Smith, G., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., Relton, C. L., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.2 · Cited by 1,273
Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations
Smith, G. D. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh132 · Cited by 1,222
Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation
Carter, A. R., Sanderson, E., Hammerton, G., Richmond, R. C., Davey Smith, G., Heron, J., Taylor, A. E., Davies, N. M., & Howe, L. D. (2021) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1 · Cited by 1,215
Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies
Zheng, J., Baird, D. A., Borges, M. C., Bowden, J., Hemani, G., Haycock, P., Evans, D. M., & Smith, G. D. (2017) · Current Epidemiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6 · Cited by 1,147
Ferriero, D. M. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041996 · Cited by 1,148
(2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60110-x · Cited by 1,146
Gene–environment interactions in human diseases
Hunter, D. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1578 · Cited by 1,132
Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology
Lawlor, D. A., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw314 · Cited by 1,129
Plasma Fibrinogen Level and the Risk of Major Cardiovascular Diseases and Nonvascular Mortality
Danesh, J., Lewington, S., Thompson, S. G., Lowe, G. D. O., Collins, R., Kostis, J. B., Wilson, A. C., Folsom, A. R., Wu, K., Benderly, M., et al. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.14.1799 · Cited by 1,162
Nordestgaard, B. G. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.306249 · Cited by 1,116
Sanderson, E., Davey Smith, G., Windmeijer, F., & Bowden, J. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy262 · Cited by 1,085
Bowden, J., Del Greco M, F., Minelli, C., Zhao, Q., Lawlor, D. A., Sheehan, N. A., Thompson, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy258 · Cited by 995
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Testing of Biological Ascertainment for Mendelian Randomization Studies
Rodrı́guez, S., Gaunt, T. R., & Day, I. N. M. (2009) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn359 · Cited by 1,055
Vimaleswaran, K. S., Berry, D. J., Lu, C., Tikkanen, E., Pilz, S., Hiraki, L. T., Cooper, J. D., Dastani, Z., Li, R., Houston, D. K., et al. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001383 · Cited by 1,046
Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data
Zhu, Z., Zheng, Z., Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Trzaskowski, M., Maier, R., Robinson, M. R., McGrath, J. J., Visscher, P. M., Wray, N. R., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02317-2 · Cited by 951
Burgess, S., Dudbridge, F., & Thompson, S. G. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv017 · Cited by 930
Richardson, T. G., Sanderson, E., Palmer, T. M., Ala-Korpela, M., Ference, B. A., Davey Smith, G., & Holmes, M. V. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062 · Cited by 843
The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructurePreprint
Elsworth, B., Lyon, M., Alexander, T., Liu, Y., Matthews, P., Hallett, J., Bates, P., Palmer, T., Haberland, V., Smith, G. D., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.10.244293 · Cited by 946
Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
Didelez, V., & Sheehan, N. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206077743 · Cited by 923
A LIFE COURSE APPROACH TO CHRONIC DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY
Lynch, J. W., & Smith, G. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144505 · Cited by 956
Soininen, P., Kangas, A. J., Würtz, P., Suna, T., & Ala‐Korpela, M. (2015) · Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics · doi:10.1161/circgenetics.114.000216 · Cited by 917
Bowden, J., Spiller, W., Del Greco M, F., Sheehan, N., Thompson, J., Minelli, C., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy101 · Cited by 880
Zheng, J., Erzurumluoglu, A. M., Elsworth, B. L., Kemp, J. P., Howe, L., Haycock, P. C., Hemani, G., Tansey, K., Laurin, C., Early Genetics and Lifecourse Epidemiology (EAGLE) Eczema Consortium, et al. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw613 · Cited by 869
Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease
Do, R., Willer, C. J., Schmidt, E. M., Sengupta, S., Gao, C., Peloso, G. M., Gustafsson, S., Kanoni, S., Ganna, A., Chen, J., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2795 · Cited by 862
Hartwig, F. P., Davies, N. M., Hemani, G., & Davey Smith, G. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx028 · Cited by 860
Leucocyte telomere length and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Haycock, P. C., Heydon, E. E., Kaptoge, S., Butterworth, A. S., Thompson, A., & Willeit, P. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4227 · Cited by 856
Zhao, Q., Wang, J., Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Small, D. S. (2020) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/19-aos1866 · Cited by 868
Shah, S. H., Henry, A., Roselli, C., Lin, H., Sveinbjörnsson, G., Fatemifar, G., Hedman, Å. K., Wilk, J. B., Morley, M. P., Chaffin, M. D., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13690-5 · Cited by 836
Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope
Richmond, R. C., & Davey Smith, G. (2022) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040501 · Cited by 841
Genetically elevated C-reactive protein and ischemic vascular disease
Zacho, J., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., Jensen, J. S., Grande, P., Sillesen, H., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707402 · Cited by 839
Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Mediation
Sanderson, E. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a038984 · Cited by 827
Commentary: Two-sample Mendelian randomization: opportunities and challenges
Lawlor, D. A. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw127 · Cited by 810
Zheng, J., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Walker, V., Haycock, P., Hurle, M., Gutteridge, A., Erola, P., Liu, Y., Luo, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/627398 · Cited by 812
Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider
Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Schisterman, E. F., Chu, H., Westreich, D., Richardson, D., & Poole, C. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyp334 · Cited by 796
Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism
Visconti, A., Le Roy, C. I., Rosa, F., Rossi, N., Martin, T. C., Mohney, R. P., Li, W., de Rinaldis, E., Bell, J. T., Venter, J. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12476-z · Cited by 782
Zhao, J. H., Stacey, D., Eriksson, N., Macdonald-Dunlop, E., Hedman, Å. K., Kalnapenkis, A., Enroth, S., Cozzetto, D., Digby-Bell, J. L., Marten, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-023-01588-w · Cited by 781
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023
Burgess, S., Smith, G. D., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Kutalik, Z., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., et al. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3 · Cited by 747
Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies
(2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60545-4 · Cited by 716
Gene–environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches
Thomas, D. C. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2764 · Cited by 701
Würtz, P., Kangas, A. J., Soininen, P., Lawlor, D. A., Smith, G. D., & Ala‐Korpela, M. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx016 · Cited by 669
A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants
Burgess, S., Foley, C. N., Allara, E., Staley, J. R., & Howson, J. M. M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14156-4 · Cited by 681
Swerdlow, D. I., Preiss, D., Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Holmes, M. V., Engmann, J. E. L., Shah, T., Sofat, R., Stender, S., Johnson, P. C. D., Scott, R. A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61183-1 · Cited by 680
Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality
Holmes, M. V., Ala-Korpela, M., & Smith, G. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2017.78 · Cited by 679
Holmes, M. V., Dale, C. E., Zuccolo, L., Silverwood, R. J., Guo, Y., Ye, Z., Prieto-Merino, D., Dehghan, A., Trompet, S., Wong, A., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4164 · Cited by 669
Self-citationCarreras‐Torres, R., Johansson, M., Haycock, P., Wade, K. H., Relton, C. L., Martin, R. M., Smith, G. D., Albanes, D., Aldrich, M. C., Andrew, A. S., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177875 · Cited by 664
Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis
Papadimitriou, N., Dimou, N. L., Tsilidis, K. K., Banbury, B. L., Martin, R. M., Lewis, S. J., Kazmi, N., Robinson, T., Albanes, D., Aleksandrova, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14389-8 · Cited by 664
A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data
Slob, E. A. W., & Burgess, S. (2020) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.22295 · Cited by 644
Burgess, S. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu005 · Cited by 637
Macleod, J., Oakes, R., Copello, A., Crome, I., Egger, M., Hickman, M., Oppenkowski, T., Stokes-Lampard, H., & Smith, G. D. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16200-4 · Cited by 639
Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting
Boef, A. G. C., Dekkers, O. M., & le Cessie, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv071 · Cited by 610
Sanderson, E. C. M., Spiller, W., & Bowden, J. (2021) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9133 · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Davey Smith, G., & Ebrahim, S.
- ORCID
- Ebrahim, Shah
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2106036991
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 179
- Citations by year
- 2026: 333 · 2025: 673 · 2024: 1162 · 2023: 681 · 2022: 453 · 2021: 442 · 2020: 353 · 2019: 235 · 2018: 201 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 31.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Keywords
- Mendelian randomization, genetic epidemiology, environmental factors in disease, causal inference, confounding, reverse causality, linkage disequilibrium, canalization, genetic polymorphism, genetic testing, public health genetics, disease prevention, Human Genome Project, pathogenesis, cancer genetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease, Environmental Exposure, Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Molecular Epidemiology, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
