Cited by 234Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Microbiota and the gut–brain axis

Bienenstock, John, Kunze, Wolfgang, Forsythe, Paul·2015·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

Changes in gut microbiota can modulate the peripheral and central nervous systems, resulting in altered brain functioning, and suggesting the existence of a microbiota gut-brain axis. Diet can also change the profile of gut microbiota and, thereby, behavior. Effects of bacteria on the nervous system cannot be disassociated from effects on the immune system since the two are in constant bidirectional communication. While the composition of the gut microbiota varies greatly among individuals, alterations to the balance and content of common gut microbes may affect the production of molecules such as neurotransmitters, e.g., gamma amino butyric acid, and the products of fermentation, e.g., the short chain fatty acids butyrate, propionate, and acetate. Short chain fatty acids, which are pleomorphic, especially butyrate, positively influence host metabolism by promoting glucose and energy homeostasis, regulating immune responses and epithelial cell growth, and promoting the functioning of the central and peripheral nervous systems. In the future, the composition, diversity, and function of specific probiotics, coupled with similar, more detailed knowledge about gut microbiota, will potentially help in developing more effective diet- and drug-based therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nutrit/nuv019

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ANS provides the gut with the most direct neurological response available, leading to rapid changes in gut physiology, through innervation of the target organ, in both health and disease.

    “The ANS provides the gut with the most direct neurological response available, leading to rapid changes in gut physiology, through innervation of the target organ, in both health and disease (Bienenstock et al., 2015)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Bienenstock et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bienenstock, J., Kunze, W., & Forsythe, P.
Affiliations
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
73
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
28-31
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2171351284
Cited by
234
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Danone
  • Instituto Danone
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
gut microbiota, gut-brain axis, diet, behavior, immune system, neurotransmitters, GABA, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, probiotics, energy homeostasis, host-microbe interactions
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Brain, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review