Cited by 577Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome

Open access
Rao, A Venket, Bested, Alison C, Beaulne, Tracey M, Katzman, Martin A, Iorio, Christina, Berardi, John M, Logan, Alan C·2009·Gut Pathogens

Abstract

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is complex illness of unknown etiology. Among the broad range of symptoms, many patients report disturbances in the emotional realm, the most frequent of which is anxiety. Research shows that patients with CFS and other so-called functional somatic disorders have alterations in the intestinal microbial flora. Emerging studies have suggested that pathogenic and non-pathogenic gut bacteria might influence mood-related symptoms and even behavior in animals and humans. In this pilot study, 39 CFS patients were randomized to receive either 24 billion colony forming units of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota (LcS) or a placebo daily for two months. Patients provided stool samples and completed the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Inventories before and after the intervention. We found a significant rise in both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria in those taking the LcS, and there was also a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms among those taking the probiotic vs controls (p = 0.01). These results lend further support to the presence of a gut-brain interface, one that may be mediated by microbes that reside or pass through the intestinal tract.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1757-4749-1-6

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • L. casei strain significantly reduced anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

    “Furthermore, L. casei strain significantly reduced anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (Rao et al. 2009)”
  • There is preliminary evidence for reduced subjective feelings of anxiety and improved aspects of well-being after probiotic intake.

    “Additionally, there is now preliminary evidence for reduced subjective feelings of anxiety and improved aspects of well-being after probiotic intake (Rao et al. 2009; Messaoudi et al. 2011).”
  • The current results differ from previous findings that indicate subjective anxiolytic effects of probiotics.

    “The current results also differ from previous findings that indicate subjective anxiolytic effects of probiotics (Rao et al. 2009; Messaoudi et al. 2011) as we found no effects of prebiotics on subjective measures of subclinical anxiety or perceived stress.”
  • In individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome, 8 weeks of L. casei (8×10^7 CFU) reduced anxiety symptoms.

    “A study by Rao et al. [277], reported that 8 weeks of 8 × 107 CFU of L. casei given to individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome reduced anxiety symptoms.”
  • In adults with chronic fatigue syndrome, 8 weeks of the same probiotic preparation had no effect on depression but significantly improved Beck Anxiety Inventory scores compared with placebo.

    “There was no effect on depression, but those receiving the probiotic demonstrated significant improvement on the Beck Anxiety Inventory compared with the placebo group.131”

    From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [131]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, A. V., Bested, A. C., Beaulne, T. M., Katzman, M. A., Iorio, C., Berardi, J. M., & Logan, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Women's College Hospital (CA)
  • START Clinic (CA)
Corresponding author
Logan, Alan C
Venue
Gut Pathogens
Published
2009-03-19
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
1757-4749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024392981
Cited by
577
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Gut Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, probiotics, Lactobacillus casei Shirota, anxiety, depression, gut microbiota, gut-brain axis, Bifidobacterium, functional somatic syndromes, mood symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review