Cited by 482Climate Change, Adaptation, MigrationClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change Communication and Perception

Human Migration in the Era of Climate Change

Open access
Cattaneo, Cristina, Beine, Michel, Fröhlich, Christiane J., Kniveton, Dominic, Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, Mastrorillo, Marina, Millock, Katrin, Piguet, Etienne +1 more·2019·Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Abstract

Migration is one response to climatic stress and shocks. In this article we review the recent literature across various disciplines on the effects of climate change on migration. We explore key features of the relationship between climate change and migration, distinguishing between fast-onset and slow-onset climatic events and examining the causes of heterogeneity in migratory responses to climate events. We also seek to shed light on the interactions between different types of adaptations to climate events as well as the mechanisms underlying the relationship between climate change and migration. Based on our review of the existing literature, we identify gaps in the literature and present some general policy recommendations and priorities for research on climate-induced migration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/reep/rez008

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of quantitative empirical studies agree that climatic conditions are important for migration, but their results vary substantially, making it difficult to establish when and under which conditions climate migration occurs.

    “While the majority of studies agree that climatic conditions are important for migration, their results vary substantially, making it difficult to establish when and under which conditions climate migration occurs (Cattaneo et al., 2019;Hunter et al., 2015;Obokata et al., 2014;Piguet, 2010;Warner and Afifi, 2014).”

    From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Cattaneo et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the climate–migration relationship remains incompletely understood and depends on context; the Conclusions (page unavailable) describe varied migration outcomes and climatic factors as generally one factor in migration decisions. These passages support the claim about substantial variation and difficulty identifying the conditions for climate migration, but they do not establish that a majority of quantitative empirical studies agree climatic conditions are important. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The growing consensus among researchers is that climatic events indeed affect human migration.

    “The growing consensus among researchers is that climatic events indeed affect human migration, yet the prevailing questions are under which circumstances, how and why (Cattaneo et al., 2019).”
  • Macro studies capture migration at a more aggregated level, typically considering migration rates or counts between regions or countries, and this approach comes with limitations important for interpretation of results.

    “Abstracting from the micro level, macro studies capture migration at a more aggregated level, typically considering migration rates or counts between regions or countries.Also this approach comes with certain limitations that are important for the interpretation of the results (Cattaneo et al., 2019).”

    From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Cattaneo et al., 2019

    The Slow Onset Events section mentions an interprovincial migration study, and Migration Projections cautions against treating future migration estimates as accurate predictions. Neither passage characterizes macro studies as using aggregated migration rates or counts between regions or countries, or discusses limitations of that approach. Searches for macro-level studies, aggregated data, migration rates and methodological limitations found no passage addressing the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]17. Boustan L. P., M. Kahn and P. Rhode (2012) "Moving to higher ground: Migration response to natural disasters in the early twentieth century" American Economic Review, 102(3), 238-244
  2. [26]26. Ciccone A. (2011) "Economic shocks and civil conflicts: a comment" American Economic Journal: Applied Economics", 3, 215-227
  3. [69]69. McLeman R, Gemenne F (eds) (2018) Routledge Handbook of Environmental Migration and Displacement. Routledge, London
  4. [81]81. Rademacher-Schulz C., B. Schraven and E. S. Mahama (2014) "Time matters: Shifting seasonal migration in Northern Ghana due to rainfall variability and food insecurity" Climate and Development, 6(1), 46-52

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cattaneo, C., Beine, M., Fröhlich, C. J., Kniveton, D., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., Mastrorillo, M., Millock, K., Piguet, E., & Schraven, B.
Affiliations
  • RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Cattaneo, Cristina
  • Beine, Michel
  • Fröhlich, Christiane J.
  • Kniveton, Dominic
  • Mastrorillo, Marina
  • Millock, Katrin
  • Schraven, Benjamin
Venue
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
189-206
ISSN
  • 1750-6816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-6824
OpenAlex
W2953584228
Cited by
482
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
75.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0046)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
climate-induced migration, climate change, climate shocks, climate change adaptation, climate migration policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review