Cited by 58Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAction Observation and SynchronizationPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The neural mediators of kindness-based meditation: a theoretical model

Open access
Mascaro, Jennifer S., Darcher, Alana, Negi, Lobsang T., Raison, Charles L.·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Although kindness-based contemplative practices are increasingly employed by clinicians and cognitive researchers to enhance prosocial emotions, social cognitive skills, and well-being, and as a tool to understand the basic workings of the social mind, we lack a coherent theoretical model with which to test the mechanisms by which kindness-based meditation may alter the brain and body. Here, we link contemplative accounts of compassion and loving-kindness practices with research from social cognitive neuroscience and social psychology to generate predictions about how diverse practices may alter brain structure and function and related aspects of social cognition. Contingent on the nuances of the practice, kindness-based meditation may enhance the neural systems related to faster and more basic perceptual or motor simulation processes, simulation of another's affective body state, slower and higher-level perspective-taking, modulatory processes such as emotion regulation and self/other discrimination, and combinations thereof. This theoretical model will be discussed alongside best practices for testing such a model and potential implications and applications of future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00109

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is associated with greater pro-social behaviors.

    “Oxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is also associated with greater pro-social behaviors (e.g., improved face expression recognition, enhanced encoding of positive social memories; Isgett, Algoe, Boulton, Way, & Fredrickson, 2016; Mascaro et al, 2015; Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009).”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Mascaro et al, 2015

    The Neuromodulatory Backdrop section links oxytocin to prosocial behaviors and to vagal activity and reduced sympathetic responses to stress, which supports the prosocial and relaxation-related parts of the claim. It does not discuss secure attachment physiology or the specific examples of facial-expression recognition and positive social-memory encoding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meditation was associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex.

    “Meditation was also associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex (Mascaro, Darcher, Negi, & Raison, 2015; Weng et al., 2013).”
  • Emotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes.

    “and emotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes (Mascaro et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bloom P. (2014). “Against empathy,” in Boston Review. Cambridge, MA Available at: www.bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy
  2. Mascaro J. S. (2011). A Longitudinal Investigation of Empathic Behavior and Neural Activity and their Modulation by Compassion Meditation. Ph.D. thesis, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mascaro, J. S., Darcher, A., Negi, L. T., & Raison, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Mascaro, Jennifer S.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
6
Pages
109-109
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985069782
Cited by
58
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
compassion meditation, loving-kindness meditation, neural mechanisms, social cognition, perspective taking, emotion regulation, self-other distinction, prosocial emotions, contemplative practice, theoretical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review