Cited by 430Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disorders

Cognitive Function Following Acute Sleep Restriction in Children Ages 10–14

Angela C. Randazzo, Mark J. Muehlbach, Paula Klingenberg Schweitzer, James K. Walsh·1998·Sleep

Abstract

Study objectives Various aspects of human performance were assessed in children after sleep loss. Participants Sixteen children (7 males, 9 females) between the ages of 10 and 14 years. Design and interventions Children were randomly assigned to either a control (CTRL) group, with 11 hours in bed, or an experimental sleep restriction (SR) group, with 5 hours in bed, on a single night in the sleep laboratory. Measurements Both groups were evaluated the following day with a battery of performance and sleepiness measures. Psychomotor and cognitive performance tests were given during four 1-hour testing sessions at 2-hour intervals. Results A multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) documented shorter latencies for SR children than controls. Significant treatment differences were discovered in three of four variables of verbal creativity, including fluency, flexibility, and average indices. There were also group differences found on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), which may be indicative of difficulty learning new abstract concepts. Measures of rote performance and less-complex cognitive functions, including measures of memory and learning and figural creativity, did not show differences between groups, perhaps because motivation could overcome sleepiness-related impairment for these tasks. Conclusions Higher cognitive functions in children, such as verbal creativity and abstract thinking, are impaired after a single night of restricted sleep, even when routine performance is r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/21.8.861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randazzo, A. C., Muehlbach, M. J., Schweitzer, P. K., & Walsh, J. K.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Angela C. Randazzo
Venue
Sleep
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
861-8
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1639673129
Cited by
430
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 25
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, children, cognitive function, psychomotor performance, sleepiness, multiple sleep latency test, verbal creativity, abstract thinking, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, learning and memory, motivation
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review