Cited by 37Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Perfluorododecanoic Acid Induces Cognitive Deficit in Adult Rats

Open access
Kawabata, Kohei, Matsuzaki, Hirokazu, Nukui, Sahoko, Okazaki, Mari, Sakai, Ayako, Kawashima, Yoichi, Kudo, Naomi·2017·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

The brain level of perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) was compared with those of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) in rats 9 days after a single oral dose (50 mg/kg). The PFDoA level in the brain was 44.0 ± 2.0 µg/g, which was higher than that in the serum (24.4 ± 1.0 µg/ml). In contrast, the concentrations of PFOA and PFDA in the brain were low (<0.8 and 4.7 ± 0.4 µg/g, respectively), and less than one-tenth of those in the serum. Next, to investigate the effects on brain function, the cognitive function alterations of PFOA, PFDA, and PFDoA were estimated by the novel object recognition test 5-6 days after dosing. A significant decrease in the discrimination index was observed in PFDoA-treated rats while no significant alteration was observed in PFDA- and PFOA-treated rats. The effects of PFDoA were further assessed by other behavioral tests. PFDoA-associated alteration was observed in the elevated-plus maze test, but not in the Y-maze test, open-field test, and forced swim test. A decrease in the discrimination index of the novel object recognition test was dependent on the PFDoA dose and the PFDoA concentration in the brain. PFDoA concentration in the brain was 28.6 ± 2.6 µg/g 30 days after dosing, and a decrease in discrimination index was observed. Taken together, these results suggest that PFDoA distributes in the brain easier than PFOA and PFDA and causes cognitive deficit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfx058

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Kawabata et al. (2017), rats exposed to the same dosage of PFOA or PFDA did not exhibit memory deficits in the novel object recognition task, and animals in all treatment groups exhibited intact working memory.

    “However, rats exposed to the same dosage of PFOA or perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) did not exhibit memory deficits in the novel object recognition task, and animals in all treatment groups exhibited intact working memory (Kawabata et al., 2017).”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Kawabata et al., 2017

    The Animals and treatments and Effects of PFCA on memory function sections report that PFOA and PFDA were tested at the same 50 mg/kg dose as PFDoA and showed no significant novel-object-recognition deficit. The Y-maze result supports intact working memory only for the vehicle and PFDoA groups; the Experimental protocols section says PFOA and PFDA groups were not given that test. Page numbers are unavailable in the supplied copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rats exposed to PFDoA showed evidence of decreased anxiety by spending more time than control rats in the open arm of an elevated plus maze, and exhibited no changes in anxiety-related behavior when tested in the open field.

    “In contrast, rats exposed to PFDoA showed evidence of decreased anxiety, by spending more time than control rats in the open arm of an elevated plus maze, and exhibited no changes in anxiety-related behavior when tested in the open field (Kawabata et al., 2017).”
  • Kawabata et al. (2017) found that adult male rats exposed to a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg PFDoA experienced decreased memory and attention in a dose-dependent fashion.

    “Similarly, in a novel object recognition test conducted by Kawabata et al. (2017), adult male rats exposed to a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) experienced decreased memory and attention in a dose dependent fashion.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawabata, K., Matsuzaki, H., Nukui, S., Okazaki, M., Sakai, A., Kawashima, Y., & Kudo, N.
Affiliations
Josai University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kudo, Naomi
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2017-04-11
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
421-428
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2605989708
Cited by
37
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (acceptedVersion)
  • Josai University Repository of Academia (Josai University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
perfluorododecanoic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorodecanoic acid, perfluorinated compounds, brain distribution, cognitive impairment, novel object recognition, discrimination index, neurotoxicity, dose-dependent effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Lauric Acids, Male, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review