Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) to Evaluate the Indirect Workplace Costs of Illness

Kessler, Ronald C., Ames, Minnie, Hymel, Pamela A., Loeppke, Ronald, McKenas, David K., Richling, Dennis E., Stang, Paul E., Ustun, T. Bedirhan·2004·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This report presents an overview of methodological issues in estimating the indirect workplace costs of illness from data obtained in employee surveys using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). The HPQ is a brief self-report questionnaire that obtains three types of information: screening information about the prevalence and treatment of commonly occurring health problems; information about three types of workplace consequences (sickness absence, presenteeism, and critical incidents); and basic demographic information. The report considers two sets of methodological issues. The first set deals with measurement. The rationale for the HPQ approach to measurement is described in this section. In addition, data are presented regarding the accuracy of HPQ measures, documenting that the HPQ has excellent reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The second set of methodological issues deals with data analysis. A number of analysis problems are reviewed that arise in using self-report nonexperimental survey data to estimate the workplace costs of illness and the cost-effectiveness of treatment. Innovative data analysis strategies are described to address these problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Parmenter, 2003, Controlling health care costs: Components of a new paradigm., J Financial Services Prof, 57, 59
  2. Rosenheck, 1999, Effect of declining mental health service use on employees of a large corporation., Health Aff (Millwood), 18, 193, 10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.193 · DOI
  3. Loeppke, 2003, Health-related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel., J Occup Environ Med, 45, 349, 10.1097/01.jom.0000063619.37065.e2 · DOI
  4. Pauly, 2002, A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees., Health Econ, 11, 221, 10.1002/hec.648 · DOI
  5. Kessler, 2003, The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ)., J Occup Environ Med, 45, 156, 10.1097/01.jom.0000052967.43131.51 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kessler, 2000, The World Health Organization World Mental Health 2000 Initiative., Hosp Manag Int, 195-, 196
  7. Kessler, 2003, Comorbid mental disorders account for the role impairment of commonly occurring chronic physical disorders: results from the National Comorbidity Survey., J Occup Environ Med, 45, 1257, 10.1097/01.jom.0000100000.70011.bb · DOI · Paper page
  8. Endicott, 1997, Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects., Psychopharmacol Bull, 33, 13
  9. Koopman, 2002, Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity., J Occup Environ Med, 44, 14, 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004 · DOI
  10. Lerner, 2001, 3rd, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Medical Care., Jan, 39, 72
  11. Reilly, 1993, The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument., Pharmacoeconomics, 4, 353, 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Means, 1991, When personal history repeats itself: Decomposing memories for recurring events., Appl Cognit Psychol, 5, 297, 10.1002/acp.2350050402 · DOI
  13. Halabi, 1992, Reliability and validity of self and proxy reporting of morbidity data: a case study from Beirut, Lebanon., Int J Epidemiol, 21, 607, 10.1093/ije/21.3.607 · DOI
  14. Heliovaara, 1993, Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases. The Mini-Finland Health Survey., J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 181, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90056-7 · DOI
  15. Kriegsman, 1996, Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy., J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1407, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00274-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gross, 1996, The validity of self-reports on chronic disease: characteristics of under-reporters and implications for the planning of services., Public Health Rev, 24, 167
  17. Mackenbach, 1996, Differences in the misreporting of chronic conditions, by level of education: the effect on inequalities in prevalence rates. Am J Public Health., May, 86, 706
  18. Cohen, 1960, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales., Ed Psychol Meas, 20, 37, 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lipton, 2003, A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: the ID Magrain (TM) validation study., Neurology, 61, 375, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000078940.53438.83 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kroenke, 2002, The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms., Psychosom Med, 64, 258, 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Duncan, 1985, Panel data and models of change: a comparison of first difference and conventional two-wave models., Soc Sci Res, 14, 80, 10.1016/0049-089X(85)90013-4 · DOI
  22. Benneyan, 2003, Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests and longitudinal surveillance methods., Int J Qual Health Care, 15, 5, 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.5 · DOI
  23. Austin, 2002, A comparison of Bayesian methods or profiling hospital performance., Med Decis Making, 22, 163, 10.1177/0272989X0202200213 · DOI
  24. Zhao, 2002, Disease burden profiles: an emerging tool for managing managed care., Health Care Manag Sci, 5, 211, 10.1023/A:1019711617120 · DOI
  25. Weiss, 2002, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias among medicare beneficiaries., Am J Med, 112, 519, 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01078-1 · DOI
  26. Ormel, 1998, Functioning, well-being, and health perception in late middle-aged and older people: comparing the effects of depressive symptoms and chronic medical conditions., J Am Geriatr Soc, 46, 39, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01011.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Berardi, 1999, Mental, physical and functional status in primary care attenders., Int J Psychiatry Med, 29, 133, 10.2190/3D0C-QREW-1M5W-VDUU · DOI
  28. Sullivan, 2001, Depression and self-reported physical health in patients with coronary disease: mediating and moderating factors., Psychosom Med, 63, 248, 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00008 · DOI
  29. Solomon, 2002, Variation in patient-reported quality among health care organizations., Health Care Financ Rev, 23, 85
  30. Zaslavsky, 2002, Combining health plan performance indicators into simpler composite measures., Health Care Financ Rev, 23, 101
  31. Mukamel, 2002, Quality of cardiac surgeons and managed care contracting practices., Health Serv Res, 37, 1129, 10.1111/1475-6773.10212 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kessler, R. C., Ames, M., Hymel, P. A., Loeppke, R., McKenas, D. K., Richling, D. E., Stang, P. E., & Ustun, T. B.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2004-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
S23-S37
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5
OpenAlex
W1968881820
Cited by
447
References
7
FWCI
21.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.