Cited by 76Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Attentional effects of gaze shifts are influenced by emotion and spatial frequency, but not in autism

Open access
de JONG, MAARTJE CATHELIJNE, van ENGELAND, HERMAN, KEMNER, CHANTAL·2008·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Impaired gaze following is an important hallmark of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in clinical settings. Yet, ASD subjects perform normally on laboratory tasks involving gaze shifts. We investigated this contradiction, hypothesizing that impaired gaze following in ASDs is not related to basic impairments in attention orienting but to impaired emotion perception and abnormal processing of spatial frequencies (i.e., local and global information).Method We tested 30 high-functioning, school-age children with ASDs and 30 age- and IQ-matched controls on a task involving gaze shifts that cue the location of targets. The cueing faces differed in emotionality and were filtered for different spatial frequencies. We recorded behavioral responses (reaction times) and brain responses (event-related potentials).Results ASD subjects performed normally when neutral faces were used. However, emotional faces elicited modified face and gaze cue processing in control subjects, but not in the ASD subjects. Furthermore, the control group was biased toward the use of low spatial frequencies (global information) to process gaze cues, whereas the ASD group was biased toward the use of high spatial frequencies (local information).Conclusions We conclude that impaired gaze following in ASDs is related to impaired emotion processing. Moreover, ASD subjects show an abnormal reliance on local information to process gaze cues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/chi.0b013e31816429a6

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct gaze, independent of the symmetry cues provided by differences between straight-ahead direct and averted gaze, is more problematic for those on the autism spectrum to process.

    “Another difference noted between ASD and control groups, which may be related, is that direct gaze (independent of the symmetry cues provided by differences between straight-ahead direct and averted gaze) is more problematic for those on the autism spectrum to process.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as De Jong et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of Mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de JONG, M. C., van ENGELAND, H., & KEMNER, C.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
443-454
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966328836
Cited by
76
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (402-01-094)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, gaze following, gaze shifts, attentional orienting, emotion perception, spatial frequency, face processing, gaze cueing, local versus global processing, event-related potentials, high-functioning children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Cues, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Masking, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review