Cited by 63Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Transformational leadership and depressive symptoms among employees: mediating factors

Open access
Perko, Kaisa, Kinnunen, Ulla, Feldt, Taru·2014·Leadership & Organization Development Journal

Abstract

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the link between transformational leadership and depressive symptoms among employees is mediated by such personal resources as occupational self-efficacy, perceived meaningfulness of the work, and work-related rumination. Design/methodology/approach: – The study was conducted using questionnaires among 557 Finnish municipal employees in various occupations. The statistical analysis was based on structural equation modeling. A multiple mediation model enabled us to investigate the specific indirect effects of each mediator. Model comparison was applied to ascertain whether the mediation should be considered as full or partial. Findings: – Results based on model comparison showed that the proposed factors fully mediated the negative relationship between transformational leadership and depressive symptoms. Thus high level of transformational leadership was associated with high levels of occupational self-efficacy and perceived meaningfulness of the work, and low level of work-related rumination during off-job time, which, in turn, were associated with low level of depressive symptoms. The fully mediated model explained 36 percent of the variance in depressive symptoms. All of the three mediators made a unique contribution to this relationship. Research limitations/implications: – The results imply that transformational leadership behaviors may decrease depressiveness among employees through strengthening the personal resources of employees. However, as the study is cross-sectional, causal relationships can only be hypothesized. Originality/value: – The study sheds new light on the possible processes through which transformational leaders may exert their health-promoting effects on employees even in terms of depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/lodj-07-2012-0082

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy can buffer technostress and technostress-related outcomes.

    “such as followers' self-efficacy (Perko et al. 2014), which can buffer technostress and technostress-related outcomes (e.g., Shu et al. 2011;Yener et al. 2021)”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Perko et al. 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bass, B.M. (1985), Leadership and performance beyond expectations, Free press, New York.
  2. Hammen, C. and Watkins, E. (2008), Depression, Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
  3. Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007), Mplus user's guide (5th ed.), Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, LA.
  4. Seltzer, J., Numerof, R. E., and Bass, B. M. (1989), "Transformational leadership: Is it a source of more burnout and stress?", Journal of Health and Human Resources Administration, Vol. 12, pp. 174-185.
  5. Sosik, J. J. and Godshalk, V. M. (2000), "Leadership styles, mentoring functions received, and job-related stress: A conceptual model and preliminary study", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 365-390.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perko, K., Kinnunen, U., & Feldt, T.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Venue
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
286-304
ISSN
0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990924343
Cited by
63
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Työsuojelurahasto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
transformational leadership, depressive symptoms, occupational self-efficacy, work-related rumination, mediation, municipal employees, employee well-being, health-promoting leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review