Cited by 249Sleep and related disordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Versus Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Primary Insomnia: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Open access
Gross, Cynthia R., Kreitzer, Mary Jo, Reilly-Spong, Maryanne, Wall, Melanie, Winbush, Nicole Y., Patterson, Robert, Mahowald, Mark, Cramer-Bornemann, Michel·2011·EXPLORE

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) as a treatment for chronic primary insomnia.Design A randomized controlled trial was conducted.Setting The study was conducted at a university health center.Patients Thirty adults with primary chronic insomnia based on criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision, 4th Edition were randomized 2:1 to MBSR or pharmacotherapy (PCT).Interventions Mindfulness-based stress reduction, a program of mindfulness meditation training consisting of eight weekly 2.5 hour classes and a daylong retreat, was provided, with ongoing home meditation practice expectations during three-month follow-up; PCT, consisting of three milligrams of eszopiclone (LUNESTA) nightly for eight weeks, followed by three months of use as needed. A 10-minute sleep hygiene presentation was included in both interventions.Main outcomes The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), sleep diaries, and wrist actigraphy were collected pretreatment, posttreatment (eight weeks), and at five months (self-reports only).Results Between baseline and eight weeks, sleep onset latency (SOL) measured by actigraphy decreased 8.9 minutes in the MBSR arm (P < .05). Large, significant improvements were found on the ISI, PSQI, and diary-measured total sleep time, SOL, and sleep efficiency (P < .01, all) from baseline to five-month follow-up in the MBSR arm. Changes of comparable magnitude were found in the PCT arm. Twenty-seven of 30 patients completed their assigned treatment. This study provides initial evidence for the efficacy of MBSR as a viable treatment for chronic insomnia as measured by sleep diary, actigraphy, well-validated sleep scales, and measures of remission and clinical recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.explore.2010.12.003

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MBSR is efficacious for improving stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, physical functioning, chronic pain, sleep disturbance, and other health problems in a variety of populations.

    “Results of several meta-analyses and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the efficacy of MBSR for improving stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, physical functioning, chronic pain, sleep disturbance, and other health problems in a variety of populations.16–21”

    From Feasibility and Acceptability of a Community-Based Modified Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program for the Under- and Unemployed (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results (Standardized Sleep Scales and Quality of Life Measures; page unavailable) report significant improvements in sleep measures and reduced insomnia-related activity impairment after MBSR. This paper is a clinical trial, not a meta-analysis or systematic review. Its anxiety and depression changes were not statistically significant, and its findings do not establish efficacy for chronic pain, stress, or the full range of health problems across varied populations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A growing body of evidence supports the benefits of mindfulness as an effective treatment to improve mood and decrease symptoms of sleep disturbance and fatigue in cancer patients.

    “A growing body of evidence supports the benefits of mindfulness as an effective treatment to improve mood and decrease symptoms of sleep disturbance and fatigue in cancer patients.12-19”

    From Implementation Readiness and Initial Effects of a Brief Mindfulness Audio Intervention Compared With a Brief Music Control During Daily Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Pilot Study. (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction (‘MBSR and Sleep’; page not provided) reports significantly improved sleep-quality scores among patients with cancer after MBSR. The References list a study of sleep, mood, and fatigue in cancer outpatients, but this paper’s text does not report whether mood or fatigue improved in those patients. Its Discussion describes mood improvements in other populations, not specifically cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders: Patient Edition (SCID I/P, Version 2.0) New York Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute 1997
  2. [28]Baer R Mindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches: A clinician's guide to evidence-base and applications Elsevier Academic Press Amsterdam 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gross, C. R., Kreitzer, M. J., Reilly-Spong, M., Wall, M., Winbush, N. Y., Patterson, R., Mahowald, M., & Cramer-Bornemann, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gross, Cynthia R.
Venue
EXPLORE
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
76-87
ISSN
1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140942529
Cited by
249
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EXPLORE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota
  • National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR00400)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, chronic primary insomnia, eszopiclone, pharmacotherapy, mindfulness meditation, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, total sleep time, sleep quality, actigraphy, sleep hygiene
MeSH terms
Eszopiclone, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Piperazines, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Azabicyclo Compounds, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review