Cited by 67Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Biological and bionic hands: natural neural coding and artificial perception

Open access
Bensmaia, Sliman J.·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

The first decade and a half of the twenty-first century brought about two major innovations in neuroprosthetics: the development of anthropomorphic robotic limbs that replicate much of the function of a native human arm and the refinement of algorithms that decode intended movements from brain activity. However, skilled manipulation of objects requires somatosensory feedback, for which vision is a poor substitute. For upper-limb neuroprostheses to be clinically viable, they must therefore provide for the restoration of touch and proprioception. In this review, I discuss efforts to elicit meaningful tactile sensations through stimulation of neurons in somatosensory cortex. I focus on biomimetic approaches to sensory restoration, which leverage our current understanding about how information about grasped objects is encoded in the brain of intact individuals. I argue that not only can sensory neuroscience inform the development of sensory neuroprostheses, but also that the converse is true: stimulating the brain offers an exceptional opportunity to causally interrogate neural circuits and test hypotheses about natural neural coding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2014.0209

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many challenges are ahead before selective activation of all receptors.

    “Bensmaia (2015) and Tyler (2015) concluded that many challenges are ahead before selective activation of all receptors.”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Bensmaia (2015)

    The Practical considerations section says that selectively activating neurons with different feature preferences would require greater electrode density and coverage. The future of somatosensory neuroprostheses section also describes current electrical stimulation as unselective. These passages support the claim that selective stimulation faces challenges, but they concern neurons, not selective activation of all receptors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Bensmaia SJ Yau JM 2011 The organization and function of the somatosensory cortex. In Handbook of touch (eds Hertenstein M Weiss S), pp. 161–188. New York, NY: Springer.
  2. [38]Bensmaia SJ Tillery SH 2013 Tactile feedback from the hand. In The human hand: a source of inspiration for robotic hands (eds Balasubramaniam R Santos VJ Matsuoka Y), pp. 143–157. New York, NY: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bensmaia, S. J.
Affiliations
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2015-09-19
Volume
370
Issue
1677
Pages
20140209
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W1957218552
Cited by
67
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-10-C-4056, Contract N66001-10-C-4056)
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
neuroprosthetics, upper limb prosthesis, somatosensory feedback, tactile perception, proprioception, neural coding, object grasping, brain-computer interface, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Artificial Limbs, Bionics, Hand, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Perception, Proprioception, Prosthesis Design, Quadriplegia, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Biomimetic Materials, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review