Cited by 704Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex

Flesher, Sharlene N., Collinger, Jennifer L., Foldes, Stephen T., Weiss, Jeffrey M., Downey, John E., Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C., Bensmaia, Sliman J., Schwartz, Andrew B. +2 more·2016·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex offers the potential for creating a sensory neuroprosthesis to restore tactile sensation. Whereas animal studies have suggested that both cutaneous and proprioceptive percepts can be evoked using this approach, the perceptual quality of the stimuli cannot be measured in these experiments. We show that microstimulation within the hand area of the somatosensory cortex of a person with long-term spinal cord injury evokes tactile sensations perceived as originating from locations on the hand and that cortical stimulation sites are organized according to expected somatotopic principles. Many of these percepts exhibit naturalistic characteristics (including feelings of pressure), can be evoked at low stimulation amplitudes, and remain stable for months. Further, modulating the stimulus amplitude grades the perceptual intensity of the stimuli, suggesting that intracortical microstimulation could be used to convey information about the contact location and pressure necessary to perform dexterous hand movements associated with object manipulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UEAs have been successfully implanted in human subjects in numerous studies and these devices have continued to work for many years.

    “Although the duration of this study was limited to 6 months, UEAs have been successfully implanted in human subjects in numerous studies (25-29) and these devices have continued to work for many years.”
  • The perceptual characteristics of microstimulation have been elucidated in recent studies of humans with chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

    “it is only in recent studies of humans with chronically implanted microelectrode arrays that the perceptual characteristics of microstimulation have been elucidated (19, 20).”
  • ICMS of area 1 of somatosensory cortex evoked sensations in the palm and fingers of the participant's right hand, described as having cutaneous qualities.

    “Stimulation evoked sensations in the palm and fingers of the participant’s right hand, which he described as having cutaneous qualities (Fig. 1C,D, Fig. S1) (19).”
  • In patients with missing limb or lost brain connection, the brain area responsible for tactile stimulation or sensory feedback for the corresponding limb is still intact.

    “In patients, either a limb is missing or its connection with the brain has been lost, though the brain area responsible for tactile stimulation or sensory feedback for the corresponding limb is still intact (Flesher et al., 2016).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Flesher et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flesher, S. N., Collinger, J. L., Foldes, S. T., Weiss, J. M., Downey, J. E., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Bensmaia, S. J., Schwartz, A. B., Boninger, M. L., & Gaunt, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Corresponding author
Gaunt, Robert A.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2016-10-19
Volume
8
Issue
361
Pages
361ra141-361ra141
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2531012506
Cited by
704
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 8
FWCI
38.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (B6789C, B7143R, RX720)
  • NSF (DGE-1247842)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
intracortical microstimulation, somatosensory cortex, spinal cord injury, somatotopic organization, pressure sensation, perceptual stability, hand area
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Hand, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Microelectrodes, Movement, Paralysis, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Treatment Outcome, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review