Cited by 246Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Spatiotemporal Effects of Microstimulation in Rat Neocortex: A Parametric Study Using Multielectrode Recordings

Butovas, Sergejus, Schwarz, Cornelius·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Using microstimulation to imprint meaningful activity patterns into intrinsically highly interconnected neuronal substrates is hampered by activation of fibers of passage leading to a spatiotemporal “blur” of activity. The focus of the present study was to characterize the shape of this blur in the neocortex to arrive at an estimate of the resolution with which signals can be transmitted by multielectrode stimulation. The horizontal spread of significant unit activity evoked by near-threshold focal electrical stimulation (charge transfer 0.8–4.8 nC) and multielectrode recording in the face representation of the primary somatosensory cortex of ketamine anesthetized rats was determined to be about 1,350 μm. The evoked activity inside this range consisted in a sequence of fast excitatory response followed by an inhibition lasting >100 ms. These 2 responses could not be separated by varying the intensity of stimulation while a slow excitatory rebound after the inhibitory response was restricted to higher stimulus intensities (>2.4 nC). Stimulation frequencies of 20 and 40 Hz evoked repetitive excitatory response standing out against a continuous background of inhibition. At 5- and 10-Hz stimulation, the inhibitory response showed a complex interaction pattern attributed to highly sublinear superposition of individual inhibitory responses. The present data help to elucidate the neuronal underpinnings of behavioral effects of microstimulation. Furthermore, they provide essential information to determine spatiotemporal constraints for purposeful multielectrode stimulation in the neocortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00245.2003

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stimulation levels of 10-20 μA biphasic current pulses of 300 μs duration at 200 Hz are thought to directly activate neurons within an approximately 100 μm radius of the electrode tip, but indirect activation of neural elements may increase this spread.

    “These levels are thought to directly activate neurons within an approximately 100 µm radius of the electrode tip46, but indirect activation of neural elements may increase this spread47.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butovas, S., & Schwarz, C.
Affiliations
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-11
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
3024-3039
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2106465336
Cited by
246
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
microstimulation, neocortex, primary somatosensory cortex, excitatory and inhibitory responses, rebound excitation, charge transfer
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Female, Male, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neocortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review