PreprintCited by 19Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory Processes and Influences

Regionally selective requirement for D1/D5 dopaminergic neurotransmission in the medial prefrontal cortex in object-in-place associative recognition memory

Open access
Savalli, Giorgia, Bashir, Zafar I., Warburton, E. Clea·2015·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Object-in-place (OiP) memory is critical for remembering the location in which an object was last encountered and depends conjointly on the medial prefrontal cortex, perirhinal cortex, and hippocampus. Here we examined the role of dopamine D1/D5 receptor neurotransmission within these brain regions for OiP memory. Bilateral infusion of D1/D5 receptor antagonists SCH23390 or SKF83566 into the medial prefrontal cortex, prior to memory acquisition, impaired OiP performance following a 5 min or 1 h delay. Retrieval was unaffected. Intraperirhinal or intrahippocampal infusions of SCH23390 had no effect. These results reveal a selective role for D1/D5 receptors in the mPFC during OiP memory encoding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.036921.114

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fallon J, Laughlin S 1995 Substantia Nigra. In: The rat nervous system (ed. Paxinos G), pp. 215– 237 Academic Press, San Diego.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savalli, G., Bashir, Z. I., & Warburton, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Warburton, E. Clea
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2015-01-15
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
69-73
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2005585617
Cited by
19
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dopamine D1/D5 receptors, medial prefrontal cortex, dopamine signaling, associative recognition memory, memory encoding, perirhinal cortex, hippocampus, SCH 23390, receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Benzazepines, Male, Synaptic Transmission, 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Dopamine Antagonists, Recognition, Psychology, Receptors, Dopamine D5, Rats, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review