The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Outgrowth and Dormancy in Axillary Buds
Open accessAbstract
The shoot system has an important role in generating a large variety of diverse plant forms (Steeves and Sussex, 1989). The overall architecture of the shoot system is derived from the activity of the primary shoot apical meristem (SAM), arising during embryogenesis, together with the activity of the additional meristems subsequently formed after seed germination. The primary SAM provides the main axis of the plant body. Plant architecture is further modified by shoot branching that results from the activity of the additional meristems. The complexity of the branching pattern depends on the temporal and spatial development of these branches. These characteristics, although they are plastic in their response to environmental cues, are genetically determined. The developmental program that specifies branching patterns in different plant species is fundamentally important for generating species-specific plant forms. The shoot branching process generally involves two developmental stages: the formation of axillary meristems in the leaf axils and the growth of axillary buds. In many plant species, the growth of axillary meristems is inhibited by the primary shoot or primary inflorescence. This phenomenon is generally known as apical dominance. The plant hormones auxin and cytokinin are thought to have a major role in controlling this process (Phillips, 1975; Cline, 1994; Tamas, 1995; Napoli et al., 1999). Auxin has an inhibitory effect on the growth of axillary buds, whereas cytokinin promotes axillary bud outgrowth. The mechanisms of axillary bud outgrowth depend on the ratio of these two hormones rather than the absolute levels of either hormone. A variety of experimental approaches have been used to examine the mechanisms controlling dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds. These range from physiological studies, such as measurement and exogenous application of plant hormones, to analyses of transgenic plants overexpressing hormone biosynthetic genes to alter endogenous hormone levels. Isolation and characterization of mutations that cause alterations in shoot branching patterns are powerful approaches. These molecular genetic approaches combined with the conventional physiological studies, such as grafting experiments, revealed that not only do auxin and cytokinin function to control the growth of axillary buds, but other factors and/or signals also have important roles. More recently, the genes expressed in dormant axillary buds were isolated and characterized. This review focuses on recent findings uncovered by physiological, genetic, and molecular studies and approaches to investigate the control of shoot branching, apical dominance, and dormancy in plants. Regulation of the initiation of axillary meristems is important for controlling the overall plant form (Kerstetter and Hake, 1997;Schmitz and Theres, 1999; Sussex and Kerk, 2001). Axillary meristems are typically located on the leaf axils. In some plants like tomato, groups of meristematic cells appear to be derived directly from the SAM of the main shoot. The cells can be recognized in early developmental stages of leaf primordia in the axils. These observations suggest that axillary meristems are formed from detached parts of the primary SAM. In other plants, including Arabidopsis, axillary meristems cannot be detected in the axils during the vegetative growth phase of the primary SAM. After the primary SAM is transformed into the reproductive phase, that is, an inflorescence meristem, differentiated cells in the leaf axils undergo dedifferentiation and regain meristematic potential. Thus, axillary meristems are formed in the leaf axils. Extrapolated developmental stages of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Axillary meristems are initiated in the leaf axil and form axillary buds (1). The axillary buds enter transition stages (2). Transition stages indicate an intermediate between dormancy and growth. Newly formed axillary buds in transition stages become dormant, dependent on their developmental program (5). Alternatively, some axillary buds in transition stages undergo growth (6). Usually dormant axillary buds enter transition stages through (5) and (3) in response to their developmental program or environmental cue, and then undergo growth (6). In some cases, axillary buds in temporary growth at transition stages might re-enter dormancy through (4) and (5). Dormancy, broadly defined, is “the temporary suspension of visible growth of any plant structure containing a meristem” (Lang, 1987). Apical dominance is defined broadly as “the inhibitory control of the shoot apex over the outgrowth of lateral buds” (Cline, 1997;Napoli et al., 1999). Apical dominance acts as a plant survival mechanism by providing a reservoir of meristems that can replace the damaged primary shoot. This mechanism works when the primary shoot is damaged or removed through disease, herbivore grazing, or pruning. Apical dominance can also be released, depending not only on
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steeves, T. A., & Sussex, I. M. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626227 · Cited by 1,334
Role of Farnesyltransferase in ABA Regulation of Guard Cell Anion Channels and Plant Water Loss
Pei, Z.-M., Ghassemian, M., Kwak, C. M., McCourt, P., & Schroeder, J. I. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5387.287 · Cited by 390
The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis
Chatfield, S. P., Stirnberg, P., Forde, B. G., & Leyser, O. (2000) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00862.x · Cited by 284
ON THE NATURE OF INHIBITIONS CAUSED BY AUXIN
Thimann, K. V. (1937) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1937.tb09119.x · Cited by 251
Romano, C. P., Hein, M. B., & Klee, H. J. (1991) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.5.3.438 · Cited by 232
The evolution of plant architecture
Sussex, I. M., & Kerk, N. M. (2001) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00132-1 · Cited by 204
Control of axillary bud initiation and shoot architecture in Arabidopsis through the SUPERSHOOT gene
Tantikanjana, T., Yong, J. W. H., Letham, D. S., Griffith, M., Hussain, M., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G., & Sundaresan, V. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.887301 · Cited by 194
Shoot Meristem Formation in Vegetative Development.
Kerstetter, R. A., & Hake, S. (1997) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.9.7.1001 · Cited by 171
Beveridge, C. A., Symons, G. M., & Turnbull, C. G. N. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.123.2.689 · Cited by 162
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Arumingtyas, 1992, Pisum Genet, 24, 17
- Bak, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 101, 10.1105/tpc.13.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- Cline, 1994, Physiol Plant, 90, 230, 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02216.x · DOI
- Cline, 1997, Am J Bot, 84, 1064, 10.2307/2446149 · DOI · Paper page
- Cline, 2000, Am J Bot, 87, 182, 10.2307/2656904 · DOI
- Devitt, 1995, Plant Mol Biol, 29, 255, 10.1007/BF00043650 · DOI
- Doebley, 1997, Nature, 386, 485, 10.1038/386485a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Durfee, 2000, Plant Mol Biol, 43, 635, 10.1023/A:1006426808185 · doi:10.1023/a:1006426808185
- Eklöf, 1997, Plant Cell Physiol, 38, 225, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029157 · DOI
- Emery, 1998, J Exp Bot, 49, 555
- Foo, 2001, Plant Physiol, 126, 203, 10.1104/pp.126.1.203 · DOI · Paper page
- Gocal, 1991, Plant Physiol, 95, 344, 10.1104/pp.95.2.344 · DOI · Paper page
- Hansen, 2001, J Biol Chem, 276, 11078, 10.1074/jbc.M010123200 · DOI · Paper page
- Hashimoto, 1998, Plant Physiol, 117, 718
- Kakimoto, 2001, Plant Cell Physiol, 42, 677, 10.1093/pcp/pce112 · DOI · Paper page
- Klee, 1991, Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 42, 529, 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.002525 · DOI
- Knox, 1984, J Exp Bot, 35, 239, 10.1093/jxb/35.2.239 · DOI
- Krochko, 1998, Plant Physiol, 118, 849, 10.1104/pp.118.3.849 · doi:10.1104/pp.118.3.849
- Lang, 1987, Hortic Sci, 22, 817
- Leyser, 1993, Nature, 364, 161, 10.1038/364161a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Madoka, 2000, Plant Cell Physiol, 41, 274, 10.1093/pcp/41.3.274 · DOI
- Madoka, 2000, Plant Cell Physiol, 41, 556, 10.1093/pcp/41.5.556 · DOI
- Malayer, 1964, Am J Bot, 51, 140, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1964.tb06612.x · DOI
- Mapelli, 1982, Plant Cell Physiol, 23, 751
- Martin, 1987, Hortic Sci, 22, 824
- Medford, 1989, Plant Cell, 1, 403, 10.2307/3869101 · doi:10.2307/3869101 · Paper page
- Miguel, 1998, J Exp Bot, 49, 547
- Napoli, 1996, Plant Physiol, 111, 27, 10.1104/pp.111.1.27 · DOI
- Napoli, 1999, Curr Top Dev Biol, 44, 127, 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60469-X · DOI
- Peng, 1997, Genes Dev, 11, 3194, 10.1101/gad.11.23.3194 · DOI · Paper page
- Phillips, 1975, Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 26, 341, 10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.002013 · DOI
- Powell, 1988, Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development., 539
- Reintanz, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 351, 10.1105/tpc.13.2.351 · DOI
- Rogg, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 465, 10.1105/tpc.13.3.465 · DOI · Paper page
- Rohde, 2000, Plant Cell, 12, 35, 10.1105/tpc.12.1.35 · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.1.35
- Rohde, 1999, Plant Cell Environ, 22, 261, 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00428.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00428.x
- Romano, 1993, Plant Cell, 5, 181, 10.2307/3869584 · doi:10.2307/3869584
- Ross, 2000, Plant J, 21, 547, 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00702.x · DOI · Paper page
- Schumacher, 1999, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 290, 10.1073/pnas.96.1.290 · DOI · Paper page
- Sherr, 1995, Genes Dev, 9, 1149, 10.1101/gad.9.10.1149 · DOI · Paper page
- Shimizu, 1998, Plant Cell Physiol, 39, 255, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029365 · DOI
- Shimizu, 1998, Plant Cell Physiol, 39, 1073, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029304 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029304
- Silverstone, 1998, Plant Cell, 10, 155, 10.1105/tpc.10.2.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Sitbon, 1992, Plant Physiol, 99, 1062, 10.1104/pp.99.3.1062 · DOI
- Snyder, 1949, Plant Physiol, 23, 195, 10.1104/pp.24.2.195 · DOI · Paper page
- Stafstrom, 1998, Planta, 205, 547, 10.1007/s004250050354 · DOI
- Stafstrom, 1988, Planta, 176, 497, 10.1007/BF00397656 · DOI
- Stafstrom, 1992, Plant Physiol, 100, 1494, 10.1104/pp.100.3.1494 · DOI
- Takei, 2001, J Biol Chem, 276, 26405, 10.1074/jbc.M102130200 · DOI · Paper page
- Tamas, 1995, Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development, 340
- Thimann, 1934, Proc R Soc London Ser B, 114, 317, 10.1098/rspb.1934.0010 · DOI · Paper page
- Tucker, 1979, Ann Bot, 43, 571, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085668 · DOI
- Weiser, 1970, Science, 169, 1269, 10.1126/science.169.3952.1269 · doi:10.1126/science.169.3952.1269
- Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 1993, Mol Gen Genet, 236, 331, 10.1007/BF00277130 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 Acts as an Integrator of Branching Signals within Axillary Buds
Aguilar-Martínez, J. A., Poza-Carrión, C., & Cubas, P. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.106.048934 · Cited by 883
Lin, H., Wang, R., Qian, Q., Yan, M., Meng, X., Fu, Z., Yan, C., Jiang, B., Su, Z., Li, J., et al. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.065987 · Cited by 670
Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance
Tanaka, M., Takei, K., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., & Mori, H. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02656.x · Cited by 512
Self-citationAuxin-cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching
Shimizu-Sato, S., Tanaka, M., & Mori, H. (2009) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9416-3 · Cited by 387
Self-citationMultiple pathways regulate shoot branching
Rameau, C., Bertheloot, J., Leduc, N., Andrieu, B., Foucher, F., & Sakr, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00741 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimizu-Sato, S., & Mori, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1405-1413
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2162063947
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Outgrowth and Dormancy in Axillary Buds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.010841
- The paper
- Shimizu-Sato, S., & Mori, H. (2001). Control of Outgrowth and Dormancy in Axillary Buds. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.