Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of Outgrowth and Dormancy in Axillary Buds

Open access
Shimizu-Sato, Sae, Mori, Hitoshi·2001·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The shoot system has an important role in generating a large variety of diverse plant forms (Steeves and Sussex, 1989). The overall architecture of the shoot system is derived from the activity of the primary shoot apical meristem (SAM), arising during embryogenesis, together with the activity of the additional meristems subsequently formed after seed germination. The primary SAM provides the main axis of the plant body. Plant architecture is further modified by shoot branching that results from the activity of the additional meristems. The complexity of the branching pattern depends on the temporal and spatial development of these branches. These characteristics, although they are plastic in their response to environmental cues, are genetically determined. The developmental program that specifies branching patterns in different plant species is fundamentally important for generating species-specific plant forms. The shoot branching process generally involves two developmental stages: the formation of axillary meristems in the leaf axils and the growth of axillary buds. In many plant species, the growth of axillary meristems is inhibited by the primary shoot or primary inflorescence. This phenomenon is generally known as apical dominance. The plant hormones auxin and cytokinin are thought to have a major role in controlling this process (Phillips, 1975; Cline, 1994; Tamas, 1995; Napoli et al., 1999). Auxin has an inhibitory effect on the growth of axillary buds, whereas cytokinin promotes axillary bud outgrowth. The mechanisms of axillary bud outgrowth depend on the ratio of these two hormones rather than the absolute levels of either hormone. A variety of experimental approaches have been used to examine the mechanisms controlling dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds. These range from physiological studies, such as measurement and exogenous application of plant hormones, to analyses of transgenic plants overexpressing hormone biosynthetic genes to alter endogenous hormone levels. Isolation and characterization of mutations that cause alterations in shoot branching patterns are powerful approaches. These molecular genetic approaches combined with the conventional physiological studies, such as grafting experiments, revealed that not only do auxin and cytokinin function to control the growth of axillary buds, but other factors and/or signals also have important roles. More recently, the genes expressed in dormant axillary buds were isolated and characterized. This review focuses on recent findings uncovered by physiological, genetic, and molecular studies and approaches to investigate the control of shoot branching, apical dominance, and dormancy in plants. Regulation of the initiation of axillary meristems is important for controlling the overall plant form (Kerstetter and Hake, 1997;Schmitz and Theres, 1999; Sussex and Kerk, 2001). Axillary meristems are typically located on the leaf axils. In some plants like tomato, groups of meristematic cells appear to be derived directly from the SAM of the main shoot. The cells can be recognized in early developmental stages of leaf primordia in the axils. These observations suggest that axillary meristems are formed from detached parts of the primary SAM. In other plants, including Arabidopsis, axillary meristems cannot be detected in the axils during the vegetative growth phase of the primary SAM. After the primary SAM is transformed into the reproductive phase, that is, an inflorescence meristem, differentiated cells in the leaf axils undergo dedifferentiation and regain meristematic potential. Thus, axillary meristems are formed in the leaf axils. Extrapolated developmental stages of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Axillary meristems are initiated in the leaf axil and form axillary buds (1). The axillary buds enter transition stages (2). Transition stages indicate an intermediate between dormancy and growth. Newly formed axillary buds in transition stages become dormant, dependent on their developmental program (5). Alternatively, some axillary buds in transition stages undergo growth (6). Usually dormant axillary buds enter transition stages through (5) and (3) in response to their developmental program or environmental cue, and then undergo growth (6). In some cases, axillary buds in temporary growth at transition stages might re-enter dormancy through (4) and (5). Dormancy, broadly defined, is “the temporary suspension of visible growth of any plant structure containing a meristem” (Lang, 1987). Apical dominance is defined broadly as “the inhibitory control of the shoot apex over the outgrowth of lateral buds” (Cline, 1997;Napoli et al., 1999). Apical dominance acts as a plant survival mechanism by providing a reservoir of meristems that can replace the damaged primary shoot. This mechanism works when the primary shoot is damaged or removed through disease, herbivore grazing, or pruning. Apical dominance can also be released, depending not only on

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.010841

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Arumingtyas, 1992, Pisum Genet, 24, 17
  2. Bak, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 101, 10.1105/tpc.13.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cline, 1994, Physiol Plant, 90, 230, 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02216.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02216.x · Paper page
  4. Cline, 1997, Am J Bot, 84, 1064, 10.2307/2446149 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cline, 2000, Am J Bot, 87, 182, 10.2307/2656904 · DOI
  6. Devitt, 1995, Plant Mol Biol, 29, 255, 10.1007/BF00043650 · DOI
  7. Doebley, 1997, Nature, 386, 485, 10.1038/386485a0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Durfee, 2000, Plant Mol Biol, 43, 635, 10.1023/A:1006426808185 · doi:10.1023/a:1006426808185
  9. Eklöf, 1997, Plant Cell Physiol, 38, 225, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029157 · DOI
  10. Emery, 1998, J Exp Bot, 49, 555
  11. Foo, 2001, Plant Physiol, 126, 203, 10.1104/pp.126.1.203 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gocal, 1991, Plant Physiol, 95, 344, 10.1104/pp.95.2.344 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hansen, 2001, J Biol Chem, 276, 11078, 10.1074/jbc.M010123200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hashimoto, 1998, Plant Physiol, 117, 718
  15. Kakimoto, 2001, Plant Cell Physiol, 42, 677, 10.1093/pcp/pce112 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Klee, 1991, Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 42, 529, 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.002525 · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.002525 · Paper page
  17. Knox, 1984, J Exp Bot, 35, 239, 10.1093/jxb/35.2.239 · DOI
  18. Krochko, 1998, Plant Physiol, 118, 849, 10.1104/pp.118.3.849 · doi:10.1104/pp.118.3.849
  19. Lang, 1987, Hortic Sci, 22, 817
  20. Leyser, 1993, Nature, 364, 161, 10.1038/364161a0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Madoka, 2000, Plant Cell Physiol, 41, 274, 10.1093/pcp/41.3.274 · DOI
  22. Madoka, 2000, Plant Cell Physiol, 41, 556, 10.1093/pcp/41.5.556 · DOI
  23. Malayer, 1964, Am J Bot, 51, 140, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1964.tb06612.x · DOI
  24. Mapelli, 1982, Plant Cell Physiol, 23, 751
  25. Martin, 1987, Hortic Sci, 22, 824
  26. Medford, 1989, Plant Cell, 1, 403, 10.2307/3869101 · doi:10.2307/3869101 · Paper page
  27. Miguel, 1998, J Exp Bot, 49, 547
  28. Napoli, 1996, Plant Physiol, 111, 27, 10.1104/pp.111.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Napoli, 1999, Curr Top Dev Biol, 44, 127, 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60469-X · DOI
  30. Peng, 1997, Genes Dev, 11, 3194, 10.1101/gad.11.23.3194 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Phillips, 1975, Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 26, 341, 10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.002013 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Powell, 1988, Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development., 539
  33. Reintanz, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 351, 10.1105/tpc.13.2.351 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rogg, 2001, Plant Cell, 13, 465, 10.1105/tpc.13.3.465 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rohde, 2000, Plant Cell, 12, 35, 10.1105/tpc.12.1.35 · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.1.35
  36. Rohde, 1999, Plant Cell Environ, 22, 261, 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00428.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00428.x
  37. Romano, 1993, Plant Cell, 5, 181, 10.2307/3869584 · doi:10.2307/3869584
  38. Ross, 2000, Plant J, 21, 547, 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00702.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schumacher, 1999, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 290, 10.1073/pnas.96.1.290 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Sherr, 1995, Genes Dev, 9, 1149, 10.1101/gad.9.10.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Shimizu, 1998, Plant Cell Physiol, 39, 255, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029365 · DOI
  42. Shimizu, 1998, Plant Cell Physiol, 39, 1073, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029304 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029304
  43. Silverstone, 1998, Plant Cell, 10, 155, 10.1105/tpc.10.2.155 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sitbon, 1992, Plant Physiol, 99, 1062, 10.1104/pp.99.3.1062 · DOI
  45. Snyder, 1949, Plant Physiol, 23, 195, 10.1104/pp.24.2.195 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Stafstrom, 1998, Planta, 205, 547, 10.1007/s004250050354 · DOI
  47. Stafstrom, 1988, Planta, 176, 497, 10.1007/BF00397656 · DOI
  48. Stafstrom, 1992, Plant Physiol, 100, 1494, 10.1104/pp.100.3.1494 · DOI
  49. Takei, 2001, J Biol Chem, 276, 26405, 10.1074/jbc.M102130200 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Tamas, 1995, Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development, 340
  51. Thimann, 1934, Proc R Soc London Ser B, 114, 317, 10.1098/rspb.1934.0010 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Tucker, 1979, Ann Bot, 43, 571, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085668 · DOI
  53. Weiser, 1970, Science, 169, 1269, 10.1126/science.169.3952.1269 · doi:10.1126/science.169.3952.1269
  54. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 1993, Mol Gen Genet, 236, 331, 10.1007/BF00277130 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Shimizu-Sato, S., & Mori, H.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
127
Issue
4
Pages
1405-1413
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2162063947
Cited by
341
References
17
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.