Cited by 1,099Healthcare during COVID-19 PandemicInternet of Things and AIAdvanced Data and IoT Technologies

A Comprehensive Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of IoT, Drones, AI, Blockchain, and 5G in Managing its Impact

Open access
Chamola, Vinay, Hassija, Vikas, Gupta, Vatsal, Guizani, Mohsen·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

The unprecedented outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus, termed as COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO), has placed numerous governments around the world in a precarious position. The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, earlier witnessed by the citizens of China alone, has now become a matter of grave concern for virtually every country in the world. The scarcity of resources to endure the COVID-19 outbreak combined with the fear of overburdened healthcare systems has forced a majority of these countries into a state of partial or complete lockdown. The number of laboratory-confirmed coronavirus cases has been increasing at an alarming rate throughout the world, with reportedly more than 3 million confirmed cases as of 30 April 2020. Adding to these woes, numerous false reports, misinformation, and unsolicited fears in regards to coronavirus, are being circulated regularly since the outbreak of the COVID-19. In response to such acts, we draw on various reliable sources to present a detailed review of all the major aspects associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the direct health implications associated with the outbreak of COVID-19, this study highlights its impact on the global economy. In drawing things to a close, we explore the use of technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), blockchain, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and 5G, among others, to help mitigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2992341

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. M. Cascella, M. Rajnik, A. Cuomo, S. C. Dulebohn, and R. Di Napoli, ''Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19) [updated 2020 Apr 6],'' in StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing, Jan. 2020. [Online]. Available: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554776/
  2. Alliance for Automotive Innovation COVID-19 Press Release. (Mar. 2020). North American Assembly Facility Operating Status 3-26-2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.autosinnovate.org/covid- 19/north-american-assembly-facility%-operating-status-3-26-2020/
  3. GSK. (Feb. 2020). CEPI and GSK Announce Collaboration to Strengthen the Global Effort to Develop a Vaccine for the 2019-nCov Virus. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/cepi- and-gsk-announce-co%llaboration-to-strengthen-the-global-effort-to- develop-a-vaccine-for-the-2019-%ncov-virus/
  4. Institut Pasteur. (Mar. 2020). CEPI Collaborates With the Institut Pasteur in a Consortium to Develop Covid-19 Vaccine. [Online]. Available: https://www.pasteur.fr/en/press-area/press-documents/cepi-collaborates- %institut-pasteur-consortium-develop-covid-19-vaccine
  5. E. Ackerman, ''Zipline Wants to Bring Medical Drone Delivery to U.S. to Fight COVID-19,'' IEEE Spectr. Technol., Eng., Sci., Apr. 3, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/ robotics/drones/zipline-medical-dro%ne-delivery-covid19
  6. V. Rees, ''AI technology to screen existing drugs for use against COVID-19,'' Drug Target Review, Apr. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.drugtargetreview.com/news/59188/ai-technology-to- screen-exi%sting-drugs-for-use-against-covid-19/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Gupta, V., & Guizani, M.
Affiliations
  • Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
  • Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (IN)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
90225-90265
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023617420
Cited by
1,099
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 259 · 2021: 359 · 2020: 107
FWCI
212.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP10-1205-160012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Data and IoT Technologies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Internet of Things, unmanned aerial vehicles, artificial intelligence, blockchain, 5G, healthcare burden, lockdown, economic impact, misinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review