Cited by 24Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

Stimulation and Artifact-Suppression Techniques for In Vitro High-Density Microelectrode Array Systems

Open access
Shadmani, Amir, Viswam, Vijay, Chen, Yihui, Bounik, Raziyeh, Dragas, Jelena, Radivojevic, Milos, Geissler, Sydney, Sitnikov, Sergey +2 more·2019·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

We present novel voltage stimulation buffers with controlled output current, along with recording circuits featuring adjustable high-pass cut-off filtering to perform efficient stimulation while actively suppressing stimulation artifacts in high-density microelectrode arrays. Owing to the dense packing and close proximity of the electrodes in such systems, a stimulation through one electrode can cause large electrical artifacts on neighboring electrodes that easily saturate the corresponding recording amplifiers. To suppress such artifacts, the high-pass corner frequencies of all available 2048 recording channels can be raised from several Hz to several kHz by applying a "soft-reset" or pole-shifting technique. With the implemented artifact suppression technique, the saturation time of the recording circuits, connected to electrodes in immediate vicinity to the stimulation site, could be reduced to less than 150 μs. For the stimulation buffer, we developed a circuit, which can operate in two modes: either control of only the stimulation voltage or control of current and voltage during stimulation. The voltage-only controlled mode employs a local common-mode feedback operational transconductance amplifier with a near rail-to-rail input/output range, suitable for driving high-capacitive loads. The current/voltage controlled mode is based on a positive current conveyor generating adjustable output currents, whereas its upper and lower output voltages are limited by two feedback loops. The current/voltage controlled circuit can generate stimulation pulses up to 30 μA with less than ±0.1% linearity error in the low-current mode and up to 300 μA with less than ±0.2% linearity error in the high-current mode.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2018.2890530

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pole shifting helps to suppress stimulus artifacts by adjusting the amplifier's frequency response with limited switching artifacts that are typically caused by alternative front-end recovery methods.

    “This method helps to suppress stimulus artifacts by adjusting the amplifier's frequency response with limited switching artifacts that are typically caused by alternative front-end recovery methods [190], such as amplifier charge reset and active electrode discharge.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Tajalli A Leblebici Y Extreme Low-Power Mixed Signal IC Design Springer New York 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shadmani, A., Viswam, V., Chen, Y., Bounik, R., Dragas, J., Radivojevic, M., Geissler, S., Sitnikov, S., Muller, J., & Hierlemann, A.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2019-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
2481-2490
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2907874759
Cited by
24
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • ERC Advanced Grants (NeuroCMOS / AdG 267351, neuroXscales / AdG 694829)
  • FP7-MTN (EngCaBra / 264417)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Furderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (205321_157092/1, MHV-Grant 171267)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Keywords
high-density microelectrode arrays, electrical stimulation, stimulation artifacts, artifact removal, high-pass filtering, pole shifting, operational transconductance amplifier, current conveyor
MeSH terms
Superconductivity, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Equipment Design, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Artifacts, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review