Cited by 72Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Activation of ganglion cells and axon bundles using epiretinal electrical stimulation

Open access
Grosberg, Lauren E., Ganesan, Karthik, Goetz, Georges A., Madugula, Sasidhar S., Bhaskhar, Nandita, Fan, Victoria, Li, Peter, Hottowy, Pawel +5 more·2017·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Epiretinal prostheses for treating blindness activate axon bundles, causing large, arc-shaped visual percepts that limit the quality of artificial vision. Improving the function of epiretinal prostheses therefore requires understanding and avoiding axon bundle activation. This study introduces a method to detect axon bundle activation on the basis of its electrical signature and uses the method to test whether epiretinal stimulation can directly elicit spikes in individual retinal ganglion cells without activating nearby axon bundles. Combined electrical stimulation and recording from isolated primate retina were performed using a custom multielectrode system (512 electrodes, 10-μm diameter, 60-μm pitch). Axon bundle signals were identified by their bidirectional propagation, speed, and increasing amplitude as a function of stimulation current. The threshold for bundle activation varied across electrodes and retinas, and was in the same range as the threshold for activating retinal ganglion cells near their somas. In the peripheral retina, 45% of electrodes that activated individual ganglion cells (17% of all electrodes) did so without activating bundles. This permitted selective activation of 21% of recorded ganglion cells (7% of expected ganglion cells) over the array. In one recording in the central retina, 75% of electrodes that activated individual ganglion cells (16% of all electrodes) did so without activating bundles. The ability to selectively activate a subset of retinal ganglion cells without axon bundles suggests a possible novel architecture for future epiretinal prostheses. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Large-scale multielectrode recording and stimulation were used to test how selectively retinal ganglion cells can be electrically activated without activating axon bundles. A novel method was developed to identify axon activation on the basis of its unique electrical signature and was used to find that a subset of ganglion cells can be activated at single-cell, single-spike resolution without producing bundle activity in peripheral and central retina. These findings have implications for the development of advanced retinal prostheses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00750.2016

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ex vivo lab prototype provides reliable experimental access to complete populations of ON and OFF parasol cell types in macaque retina.

    “These data provide reliable experimental access to complete populations of ON and OFF parasol cell types in macaque retina, so these two cell types are the focus of the empirical analysis.”

    From Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation (2024) · cites this paper as Grosberg et al., 2017

  • Many electrical stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation.

    “In general, even though some electrical stimuli selectively activated one cell, many stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation (Figure 1C; Grosberg et al., 2017).”

    From Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation (2024) · cites this paper as Grosberg et al., 2017

  • Dictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction.

    “Dictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction (Grosberg et al., 2017).”

    From Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation (2024) · cites this paper as Grosberg et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nanduri D. Prosthetic vision in Blind Human Patients: Predicting the Percepts of Epiretinal Stimulation (PhD thesis). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grosberg, L. E., Ganesan, K., Goetz, G. A., Madugula, S. S., Bhaskhar, N., Fan, V., Li, P., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Mitra, S., & Chichilnisky, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland; and
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Grosberg, Lauren E.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
1457-1471
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2620368413
Cited by
70
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) (F32EY025120, EY021271)
  • NIH (5R21EB004410, NS069375)
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (PHY-0750525)
  • Narodowe Centrum Nauki (Polish National Science Centre) (DEC-2013/10/M/NZ4/00268)
  • Pew Charitable Trusts (PEW)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
retinal ganglion cells, electrical stimulation, multi-electrode recording, bidirectional propagation, stimulation threshold, peripheral retina, central retina, artificial vision, primate retina
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Sensory Thresholds, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review