Cited by 175Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Expression Without Recognition: Contributions of the Human Amygdala to Emotional Communication

Anderson, Adam K., Phelps, Elizabeth A.·2000·Psychological Science

Abstract

A growing body of evidence from humans and other animals suggests the amygdala may be a critical neural substrate for emotional processing. In particular, recent studies have shown that damage to the human amygdala impairs the normal appraisal of social signals of emotion, primarily those of fear. However, effective social communication depends on both the ability to receive (emotional appraisal) and the ability to send (emotional expression) signals of emotional state. Although the role of the amygdala in the appraisal of emotion is well established, its importance for the production of emotional expressions is unknown. We report a case study of a patient with bilateral amygdaloid damage who, despite a severe deficit in interpreting facial expressions of emotion including fear, exhibits an intact ability to express this and other basic emotions. This dissociation suggests that a single neural module does not support all aspects of the social communication of emotional state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00224

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with amygdala damage can recognise faces and generate a normal range of facial expressions.

    “Patients with amygdala damage can recognise faces and generate a normal range of facial expressions (Anderson and Phelps, 2000).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Anderson and Phelps, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Adam K.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2000-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
106-111
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2063474774
Cited by
175
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (50812)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, emotional expression, emotional communication, emotional facial expressions, fear, social communication, emotional appraisal, neural dissociation, emotion production
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain Damage, Chronic, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nonverbal Communication, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review