The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization
Abstract
When defined in terms of social identity and affect toward copartisans and opposing partisans, the polarization of the American electorate has dramatically increased. We document the scope and consequences of affective polarization of partisans using implicit, explicit, and behavioral indicators. Our evidence demonstrates that hostile feelings for the opposing party are ingrained or automatic in voters' minds, and that affective polarization based on party is just as strong as polarization based on race. We further show that party cues exert powerful effects on nonpolitical judgments and behaviors. Partisans discriminate against opposing partisans, doing so to a degree that exceeds discrimination based on race. We note that the willingness of partisans to display open animus for opposing partisans can be attributed to the absence of norms governing the expression of negative sentiment and that increased partisan affect provides an incentive for elites to engage in confrontation rather than cooperation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the political domain, there is ample evidence that affective polarization is on the rise (Finkel et al. 2020, Iyengar & Westwood 2015), leading to concerns about reduced support for democratic norms (Broockman et al. 2022, Kingzette et al. 2021).”
From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“Some studies have found that polarization includes affective aspects related to ideology that foster the difference between groups, favoring severe divisions between us and them.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood, 2015
In the citing paper
“For various authors, it is an affective polarization associated with social beliefs and the configuration of the other as an enemy or adversary.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood, 2015
In the citing paper
“This is because personalistic links are established with electoral candidates that lead to a consideration of the other as an enemy.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood, 2015
In the citing paper
“Hence, polarization has an emotional and affective dimension that unfolds in social life and everyday relationships and goes beyond ideological opposition.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood, 2015
In the citing paper
“This results in moral disqualification of the opponent, oversimplification of their position, exacerbation of disputes in everyday interactions, and personalization of political events.”
From La ideología política, las creencias sociales y la polarización como obstáculos psicosociales para la democracia y la paz en Colombia, 2016-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood, 2015
In the citing paper
“Many scholars link these negative feelings to shifts in identity, with partisanship emerging as an important social identity under which many societal divisions and conflicts are coming to align (15–18).”
From How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Iyengar and Westwood (2015) use trust and dictator games to show people discriminate against those from other parties more than they do toward people of different races (also see Carlin & Love, 2013, 2018;Whitt et al., 2024).”
From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Iyengar and Westwood (2015)
In the citing paper
“From a social identity perspective, affective polarization is a natural offshoot of this sense of partisan group identity”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“The results indicated little racial bias; whites, in fact, preferred the African American applicant (55.8%).”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“The difference in the D-score-the operational indicator of implicit bias-across the party divide was 0.50, while the corresponding difference in implicit racial bias across the racial divide was only 0.18 (see also Theodoridis 2017 for an application of implicit measures to the study of partisanship).”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“Relative to implicit racial bias, implicit partisan bias is more widespread.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“Results show that copartisans consistently receive a bonus while opposing partisans are subject to a financial penalty.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, implicit bias is less pronounced than explicit bias as measured through survey questions; 91% of Republicans and 75% of Democrats in the same study explicitly evaluated their party more favorably.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“But 79.2% of Democrats picked the Democratic applicant and 80% of Republicans picked the Republican applicant.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“Their results showed that implicit bias is ingrained; approximately 70% of Democrats and Republicans show a bias in favor of their party.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“These results held even when the out-party candidate had a significantly higher grade point average (4.0 versus 3.5); the probability of a partisan selecting the more qualified out-party candidate was never above 30%.”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Iyengar & Westwood 2015
In the citing paper
“The body of literature on mass political polarization in the USA has yielded mixed findings: ordinary citizens are deeply divided9,31,35,41–49 or they are not10,29,36,50–54; polarization poses a huge threat to democratic functioning3,11,55, is not a problem at all13,56–58 or the nature of the threat is ambiguous7,59,60.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1×
“Previous research suggests stronger bias against the outgroup among Republicans and conservatives (Jost et al. 2003; Jost, Hennes, and Lavine 2013; Stern et al. 2012), but our evidence indicates that the polarization scores (both explicit and implicit) for partisans on the left and right were generally indistinguishab…”
ResultWhat Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655098 · Cited by 4,864
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,740
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x · Cited by 3,558
Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy
Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068895001001001 · Cited by 3,287
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 3×
“…Iyengar1 and Sean J. Westwood2 1Chandler Chair of Communication and Professor of Political Science Stanford University Building 120, Room 110 450 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305-2050 2Post-Doctoral Researcher Princeton University 308 Robertson Hall Princeton, NJ 08544 July 6, 2014 Contents”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationExperiments in Intergroup Discrimination
Tajfel, H. (1970) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96 · Cited by 2,577
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
Forsythe, R. S., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1994.1021 · Cited by 2,383
Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740 · Cited by 2,178
Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State
Duverger, M. (1964) · Cited by 2,109
An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy.
Young, K., Myrdal, G., Sterner, R., & Rose, A. M. (1944) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086087 · Cited by 2,017
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5486 · Cited by 1,800
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
Voting, a Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign
Roshwalb, I., Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1955) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247297 · Cited by 1,591
Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity
HUDDY, L., MASON, L., & AARØE, L. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000604 · Cited by 1,415
Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055407070499 · Cited by 1,330
Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · Cited by 1,321
6. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems
Kirchheimer, O. (1966) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400875337-007 · Cited by 1,320
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030103 · Cited by 1,283
The big sort: why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2303 · Cited by 1,172
Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign
Smith, D., Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1955) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709070 · Cited by 1,093
News, the politics of illusion
Bennett, W. L. (1983) · Cited by 1,024
Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00311 · Cited by 1,000
Discrimination in a Segmented Society: An Experimental Approach
Fershtman, C., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301556338 · Cited by 943
The Development of Implicit Attitudes: Evidence of Race Evaluations From Ages 6 and 10 and Adulthood
Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x · Cited by 791
Group Consciousness and Political Participation
Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110816 · Cited by 777
Has Racism Declined in America?
McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. A. (1981) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200278102500401 · Cited by 764
Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380 · Cited by 721
News, the politics of illusion
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4312 · Cited by 678
Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review.
Crosby, F. J., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.546 · Cited by 653
Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach
Greene, S. (1999) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00150 · Cited by 621
The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse
Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x · Cited by 612
Gimar, M., & Sissela, B. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315082417 · Cited by 575
The Brief Implicit Association Test
Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283 · Cited by 555
Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation
Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x · Cited by 498
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202282006 · Cited by 482
Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage
Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082435 · Cited by 370
Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System
Eldersveld, S. J. (1951) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/442882 · Cited by 327
Moberg, S., Krysan, M., & Christianson, D. (2019) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz014 · Cited by 303
The Dictator Game, Fairness and Ethnicity in Postwar Bosnia
Whitt, S., & Wilson, R. K. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00273.x · Cited by 269
Current stereotypes: A little fading, a little faking.
Sigall, H., & Page, R. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030839 · Cited by 258
Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective
Hetherington, M. J. (2009) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123408000501 · Cited by 249
Racial Solidarity and Political Participation
Chong, D., & Rogers, R. R. (2005) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-005-5880-5 · Cited by 246
Working Twice as Hard to Get Half as Far: Race, Work Ethic, and America’s Deserving Poor
DeSante, C. D. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12006 · Cited by 239
Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381611000016 · Cited by 229
The Permanent Campaign and Its Future
Ornstein, N. J., & Mann, T. E. (2000) · Cited by 220
Social distance and its origins.
Bogardus, E. S. (1992) · Applied Sociology · Cited by 218
General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization
Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018067108 · Cited by 179
Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. P. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.010 · Cited by 172
Putting Polarization in Perspective
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802331.002 · Cited by 159
On the Meaning, Measurement, and Implications of Racial Resentment
Carmines, E. G., Sniderman, P. M., & Easter, B. C. (2011) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716210387499 · Cited by 139
The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives
Klofstad, C. A., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9207-z · Cited by 136
Psychological Bulletin: Editorial.
Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.3 · Cited by 113
Munro, G. D., Weih, C., & Tsai, J. (2010) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973531003738551 · Cited by 106
Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031187 · Cited by 99
Social desirability and the randomized response technique.
Himmelfarb, S., & Lickteig, C. W. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.710 · Cited by 91
Cai, H., Sriram, N., Greenwald, A. G., & McFarland, S. G. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.6.673.54821 · Cited by 85
Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.017 · Cited by 82
“Hot” Political Cognition: Its Self-, Group-, and System-Serving Purposes
Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., & Lavine, H. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0041 · Cited by 80
W. Lance Bennett. News: the politics of illusion. Novena edición. New York, Longman Pearson, 2012
Martínez, P. D. R. (2013) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 69
A public versus private administration of the implicit association test
Boysen, G. A., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.318 · Cited by 66
A Light Bulb Goes On: Norms, Rhetoric, and Actions for the Public Good
Bolsen, T. (2011) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9186-5 · Cited by 35
Cultures of Kindness: A Meta-Analysis of Trust Game ExperimentsPreprint
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1315325 · Cited by 30
Political Sorting in Social Relationships: Evidence from an Online Dating CommunityPreprint
Malhotra, N. A., & Huber, G. A. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 6
Pol, G. (2014) · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Campbell Angus, 1960, The American Voter
- Korte Gregory, 2012, Obama Has Edge in Political Merchandise, USA Today
- Rosenfeld Michael J., 2011, How Couples Meet and Stay Together, Waves 1, 2, and 3: Public Version 3.04
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,603
Self-citationBeyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 · Cited by 1,985
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3144139 · Cited by 1,222
The welfare effects of social media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 · Cited by 857
Metadata
- Authors
- Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-16
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 690-707
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2137998590
- Cited by
- 2,452
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 241 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 313 · 2022: 248 · 2021: 273 · 2020: 330 · 2019: 232 · 2018: 165 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 374.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- affective polarization, party identification, partisan hostility, social identity, racial discrimination, implicit attitudes, American voters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
