Cited by 196Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseGut microbiota and healthClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

The taxonomic composition of the donor intestinal microbiota is a major factor influencing the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in therapy refractory ulcerative colitis

Open access
Kump, P., Wurm, P., Gröchenig, H. P., Wenzl, H., Petritsch, W., Halwachs, B., Wagner, M., Stadlbauer, V. +8 more·2018·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation is an experimental approach for the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although there is growing evidence that faecal microbiota transplantation is effective in this disease, factors affecting its response are unknown. AIMS: To establish a faecal microbiota transplantation treatment protocol in ulcerative colitis patients, and to investigate which patient or donor factors are responsible for the treatment success. METHODS: This is an open controlled trial of repeated faecal microbiota transplantation after antibiotic pre-treatment (FMT-group, n = 17) vs antibiotic pre-treatment only (AB-group, n = 10) in 27 therapy refractory ulcerative colitis patients over 90 days. Faecal samples of donors and patients were analysed by 16SrRNA gene-based microbiota analysis. RESULTS: In the FMT-group, 10/17 (59%) of patients showed a response and 4/17 (24%) a remission to faecal microbiota transplantation. Response to faecal microbiota transplantation was mainly influenced by the taxonomic composition of the donor's microbiota. Stool of donors with a high bacterial richness (observed species remission 946 ± 93 vs no response 797 ± 181 at 15367 rps) and a high relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila (3.3 ± 3.1% vs 0.1 ± 0.2%), unclassified Ruminococcaceae (13.8 ± 5.0% vs 7.5 ± 3.7%), and Ruminococcus spp. (4.9 ± 3.5% vs 1.0 ± 0.7%) were more likely to induce remission. In contrast antibiotic treatment alone (AB-group) was poorly tolerated, probably because of a sustained decrease of intestinal microbial richness. CONCLUSIONS: The taxonomic composition of the donor's intestinal microbiota is a major factor influencing the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis patients. The design of specific microbial preparation might lead to new treatments for ulcerative colitis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.14387

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher donor richness was repeatedly associated with the clinical success of FMT in a nonrandomized cohort of patients with IBD refractory to medical therapy.

    “Higher donor richness was repeatedly associated with the clinical success of FMT in a nonrandomized cohort of patients with IBD refractory to medical therapy. 54,55”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kump, P., Wurm, P., Gröchenig, H. P., Wenzl, H., Petritsch, W., Halwachs, B., Wagner, M., Stadlbauer, V., Eherer, A., Hoffmann, K. M., Deutschmann, A., Reicht, G., Reiter, L., Slawitsch, P., Gorkiewicz, G., & Högenauer, C.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (AT)
  • Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Graz Austria
Corresponding author
  • Gorkiewicz, G.
  • Högenauer, C.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-20
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2767131601
Cited by
196
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (FWF W1241‐B18)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, ulcerative colitis, donor microbiota, Akkermansia muciniphila, Ruminococcaceae, Ruminococcus, bacterial richness, treatment response, remission
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Colitis, Ulcerative, Feces, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Ruminococcus, Young Adult, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review