Cited by 79Memory Processes and InfluencesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Episodic future thinking is related to impulsive decision making in healthy adolescents

Bromberg, Uli, Wiehler, Antonius, Peters, Jan·2015·Child Development

Abstract

Delay discounting is a stable trait measure of impulsivity. Engaging in episodic future thinking (EFT) can reduce discounting, but whether individual differences in discounting are associated with differences in future thinking remains unclear. Here, this association was tested in healthy adolescents (n = 49, age range = 12-16 years, fluent German speakers, from a large German city). Data collection was between December 2011 and December 2012. Vividness of EFT (assessed via the Autobiographical Memory Interview) was negatively correlated with discounting (r = -.41, 95% CI [-.63, -.13], r(2) = .17). Regression analyses confirmed that this association was stable when controlling for additional variables, including hormonal measures of pubertal maturation and intelligence. EFT may attenuate impulsivity in young people at risk of engaging in problematic behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12390

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pubertal stage and hormone concentrations were not significantly associated with delay discounting in either boys or girls.

    “Pubertal stage and hormone concentrations were not significantly associated with delay discounting in either boys or girls, but prepubertal children were not included in these studies, so the effect of puberty onset could not be determined (Bromberg et al., 2015; de Water et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bromberg, U., Wiehler, A., & Peters, J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Bromberg, Uli
Venue
Child Development
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
1458-1468
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1770057369
Cited by
79
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PE167/3-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
episodic future thinking, delay discounting, impulsivity, adolescents, pubertal development, individual differences, decision-making
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Thinking, Adolescent Development, Memory, Episodic, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review