Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of socioeconomic status (SES) disparity on neural development in female African‐American infants at age 1 month

Betancourt, Laura M., Avants, Brian, Farah, Martha J., Brodsky, Nancy L., Wu, Jue, Ashtari, Manzar, Hurt, Hallam·2016·Developmental Science
DOI 10.1111/desc.12344
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is increasing interest in both the cumulative and long‐term impact of early life adversity on brain structure and function, especially as the brain is both highly vulnerable and highly adaptive during childhood. Relationships between SES and neural development have been shown in children older than age 2 years. Less is known regarding the impact of SES on neural development in children before age 2. This paper examines the effect of SES, indexed by income‐to‐needs (ITN) and maternal education, on cortical gray, deep gray, and white matter volumes in term, healthy, appropriate for gestational age, African‐American, female infants. At 5 weeks postnatal age, unsedated infants underwent MRI (3.0T Siemens Verio scanner, 32‐channel head coil). Images were segmented based on a locally constructed template. Utilizing hierarchical linear regression, SES effects on MRI volumes were examined. In this cohort of healthy African‐American female infants of varying SES, lower SES was associated with smaller cortical gray and deep gray matter volumes. These SES effects on neural outcome at such a young age build on similar studies of older children, suggesting that the biological embedding of adversity may occur very early in development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12344

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.058 · DOI
  2. 10.1300/J045v21n01_04 · DOI
  3. 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047816 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/desc.12282 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/cercor/bhr018 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02940.x · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3252-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.231 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.007 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30562-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00833.x · DOI
  14. 10.1093/cercor/bhu088 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0278-5846(97)00158-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3339-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2105/AJPH.89.10.1522 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018712 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042486 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/cercor/bhs401 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0600888103 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/pbc.24908 · DOI
  25. 10.1053/spen.2002.35499 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/87565641003696833 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/desc.12096 · DOI
  28. Lipina S.J., 2005, Performance on the A‐not‐B task of Argentinean infants from unsatisfied and satisfied basic needs homes, Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39, 49
  29. 10.1109/TMI.2014.2322280 · DOI
  30. Martin R.J., 2011, Neonatal‐perinatal medicine: Diseases of the fetus and infant
  31. MICCAI Society(2013).MICCAI Challenge Workshop on Segmentation: Algorithms Theory and Applications (‘SATA’).
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00600.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00394.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.029 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Osofsky H.J., 1974, Poverty, pregnancy outcome, and child development, Birth Defects, 10, 37
  36. 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36580-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.006 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018746 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.021 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/1467-8624.00313 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/desc.12079 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1159/000373885 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S1355617707070841 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.05.008 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004 · DOI

Cited by

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
Betancourt, L. M., Avants, B., Farah, M. J., Brodsky, N. L., Wu, J., Ashtari, M., & Hurt, H.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-21
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
947-956
ISSN
  • 1363-755X
  • 1467-7687
DOI
10.1111/desc.12344
Cited by
89
References
21
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Funders
NIH/NICHD (R21HD072461)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.