Cited by 369School Choice and PerformanceGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsEducational Assessment and Improvement

Do Differences in Schools’ Instruction Time Explain International Achievement Gaps? Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries

Lavy, Victor·2015·The Economic Journal

Abstract

The time that children spend in school varies across countries. Do these differences explain international gaps in pupils’ academic achievements? In this article I estimate the effects of instructional time on students’ achievement using PISA 2006 data, which include data samples from over 50 countries. I find that instructional time has a positive and significant effect on test scores, and that the effect is much lower in developing countries. Evidence also suggests that the productivity of instructional time is higher in countries which implemented school accountability measures or that gave schools autonomy in budgetary decisions and in hiring/firing teachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecoj.12233

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lavy's results would predict a 0.06 of a standard deviation fall in math scores as a result of a 12-week school closure.

    “As noted by Burgess and Sievertsen (2020), Lavy's results would predict a 0.06 of a standard deviation fall in math scores as a result of a 12-week school closure.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Lavy 2015

  • Lavy (2015) finds that disadvantaged children are more strongly affected by cross-country differences in instruction time.

    “Lavy (2015), for instance, finds that disadvantaged children are more strongly affected by cross-country differences in instruction time.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Lavy (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavy, V.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Lavy, Victor
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2015-11-01
Volume
125
Issue
588
Pages
F397-F424
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W2117499425
Cited by
369
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
159.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Israeli Science Foundation
  • Falk Research Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
instructional time, school hours, academic performance, PISA 2006, developing countries, school accountability, school autonomy, school budgeting, test scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review