Cited by 97Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRIDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Developmental continuity in theory of mind: speed and accuracy of belief-desire reasoning in children and adults

Apperly, Ian A, Warren, Frances, Andrews, Benjamin J, Grant, Jay, Todd, Sophie·2011·Child Development

Abstract

On belief-desire reasoning tasks, children first pass tasks involving true belief before those involving false belief, and tasks involving positive desire before those involving negative desire. The current study examined belief-desire reasoning in participants old enough to pass all such tasks. Eighty-three 6- to 11-year-olds and 20 adult participants completed simple, computer-based tests of belief-desire reasoning, which recorded response times as well as error rates. Both measures suggested that, like young children, older children and adults find it more difficult to reason about false belief and negative desires than true beliefs and positive desires. It is argued that this developmental continuity is most consistent with either executive competence or executive performance accounts of the development of belief-desire reasoning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01635.x

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Apperly, I. A., Warren, F., Andrews, B. J., Grant, J., & Todd, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Apperly, Ian A
Venue
Child Development
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
1691-1703
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2121897714
Cited by
97
References
80
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
theory of mind, belief-desire reasoning, false belief, true belief, developmental continuity, executive function, reaction time (psychology), error rate, children, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Culture, Humans, Judgment, Motivation, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Reality Testing, Young Adult, Executive Function, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review