Cited by 152Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center

Open access
Phan, K. Luan, Sripada, Chandra Sekhar, Angstadt, Mike, McCabe, Kevin·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Brain reward circuitry, including ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, has been independently implicated in preferences for fair and cooperative outcomes as well as learning of reputations. Using functional MRI (fMRI) and a “trust game” task involving iterative exchanges with fictive partners who acquire different reputations for reciprocity, we measured brain responses in 36 healthy adults when positive actions (entrust investment to partners) yield positive returns (reciprocity) and how these brain responses are modulated by partner reputation for repayment. Here we show that positive reciprocity robustly engages the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex. Moreover, this signal of reciprocity in the ventral striatum appears selectively in response to partners who have consistently returned the investment (e.g., a reputation for reciprocity) and is absent for partners who lack a reputation for reciprocity. These findings elucidate a fundamental brain mechanism, via reward-related neural substrates, by which human cooperative relationships are initiated and sustained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1008137107

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decisions to cooperate with another person are influenced by information learned about the person thus far.

    “Decisions to cooperate with another person are colored by the information we have learnt about the person thus far.”
  • Prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation.

    “Further research utilizing cooperative economic games has shown that the prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation and influences decisions to cooperate or not 75–79.”
  • Prior reputation of a partner influences decisions to cooperate or not.

    “Further research utilizing cooperative economic games has shown that the prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation and influences decisions to cooperate or not 75–79.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and
  • George Mason University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-07-06
Volume
107
Issue
29
Pages
13099-13104
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2063075465
Cited by
152
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH076198, K23MH076198)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
positive reciprocity, reputation, trust game, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, brain reward system, cooperation, social learning, trust investment
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Decision Trees, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Reward, Feedback, Psychological, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review