Cited by 286Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Why Do Men Hunt?: A Reevaluation of “Man the Hunter” and the Sexual Division of Labor

Gurven, Michael, Hill, Kim·2009·Current Anthropology

Abstract

The role of men in hunter-gatherer societies has been subject to vigorous debate over the past 15 years. The proposal that men hunt wild game as a form of status signaling or "showing off" to provide reproductive benefits to the hunter challenges the traditional view that men hunt to provision their families. Two broad assumptions underlie the signaling view: (1) hunting is a poor means of obtaining food, and (2) hunted game is a public good shared widely with others and without expectation of future reciprocation. If hunters lack the ability to direct food shares and obtain subsequent benefits contingent on redistribution, then the ubiquitous observations of male hunting and universal pair-bonding cannot be explained from a perspective that emphasizes kin provisioning and a division of labor. Here we show that there is little empirical support for the view that men hunt for signaling benefits alone. The ethnographic record depicts a more complex relationship between food sharing patterns, subsistence strategies, mating, and the sexual division of labor. We present a framework incorporating trade-offs between mating and subsistence strategies in an economic bargaining context that contributes to understanding men's and women's roles in hunter-gatherer societies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/595620

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurven, M., & Hill, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2009-02
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
51-74
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2070693544
Cited by
286
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19046006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
hunter-gatherers, status signaling, food sharing, pair bonding, gender division of labor, mating strategies, subsistence strategies, gender roles, reciprocity
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Supply, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Nutritional Status, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review