Cited by 158Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Delay discounting of reward in ADHD: application in young children

Open access
Wilson, Vanessa B., Mitchell, Suzanne H., Musser, Erica D., Schmitt, Colleen F., Nigg, Joel T.·2011·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A key underlying process that may contribute to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) involves alterations in reward evaluation, including assessing the relative value of immediate over delayed rewards. This study examines whether children with ADHD discount the value of delayed rewards to a greater degree than typically developing children using a delay discounting task. METHODS: Children aged 7-9 years diagnosed with ADHD and controls completed a task in which they chose between a hypothetical $10 available after a delay (7, 30, 90 and 180 days) versus various amounts available immediately. RESULTS: ADHD participants discounted more steeply than controls. However, this effect did not survive covarying of IQ. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD is associated with a steeper delay gradient when contemplating hypothetical later rewards, but not independently of IQ. The interplay of cognitive processing and IQ with reward evaluation in ADHD requires further exploration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02347.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychological Association 2002 Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct American Psychologist 57 1060 1073 12613157
  2. Cuskelly M Zhang A Hayes A 2003 A mental age-matched comparison study of delay of gratification in children with down syndrome International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education 50 3 239 251
  3. Wechsler D 2003 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual San Antonio, TX Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, V. B., Mitchell, S. H., Musser, E. D., Schmitt, C. F., & Nigg, J. T.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-17
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
256-264
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1950587681
Cited by
158
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH59105, R37MH059105, R01MH059105)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA024195, DA024195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, delay discounting, reward evaluation, delayed rewards, young children, IQ, impulsivity, decision-making
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Mental Processes, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review