Cited by 148Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Overlapping and Distinct Cognitive Impairments in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity and Autism Spectrum Disorder without Intellectual Disability

Open access
Karalunas, Sarah L., Hawkey, Elizabeth, Gustafsson, Hanna, Miller, Meghan, Langhorst, Marybeth, Cordova, Michaela, Fair, Damien, Nigg, Joel T.·2018·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are commonly comorbid, share genetic liability, and often exhibit overlapping cognitive impairments. Clarification of shared and distinct cognitive effects while considering comorbid symptoms across disorders has been lacking. In the current study, children ages 7-15 years assigned to three diagnostic groups:ADHD (n = 509), ASD (n = 97), and controls (n = 301) completed measures spanning the cognitive domains of attention/arousal, working memory, set-shifting, inhibition, and response variability. Specific processes contributing to response variability were examined using a drift diffusion model, which separately quantified drift rate (i.e., efficiency of information processing), boundary separation (i.e., speed-accuracy trade-offs), and non-decision time. Children with ADHD and ASD were impaired on attention/arousal, processing speed, working memory, and response inhibition, but did not differ from controls on measures of delayed reward discounting, set-shifting, or interference control. Overall, impairments in the ASD group were not attributable to ADHD symptoms using either continuous symptom measures or latent categorical grouping approaches. Similarly, impairments in the ADHD group were not attributable to ASD symptoms. When specific RT parameters were considered, children with ADHD and ASD shared impairments in drift rate. However, children with ASD were uniquely characterized by a wider boundary separation. Findings suggest a combination of overlapping and unique patterns of cognitive impairment for children with ASD as compared to those with ADHD, particularly when the processes underlying reaction time measures are considered separately.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-017-0394-2

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Response inhibition and response variability may be more strongly associated with ADHD than with ASD traits.

    “Studies in which ADHD and ASD traits were controlled indicate that, at least response inhibition and response variability, may be more strongly associated with ADHD than with ASD traits (Karalunas et al., 2018; Schachar et al., 2022).”

    From Do ASD and ADHD Have Distinct Executive Function Deficits? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparison Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Karalunas et al., 2018

    The Results (Executive Functioning; page unavailable) report that response-inhibition impairment in children with ASD remained after controlling for ADHD symptoms, with no reliable difference from children with ADHD. The Results (Reaction time parameters; page unavailable) likewise report elevated response variability in both groups after symptom controls. The paper therefore does not find these impairments more strongly associated with ADHD than with ASD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working memory impairments remain notable among youth with ASD when ADHD symptoms are controlled and among individuals without co-occurring ADHD.

    “Impairments on tests intended to measure working memory remain notable among youth with ASD when controlling for symptoms of ADHD65 and among individuals without co-occurring ADHD.66 67”
  • There may be more than one sole cause of any given phenotype, and such causes may be shared and distinct both between and within the disorders.

    “These results indicate that while ASD and ADHD share some etiological basis, there may be more than one sole “cause” of any given phenotype (Musser et al., 2014; Reiersen & Todd, 2008) and such causes may also be shared and distinct, both between and within the disorders (Karalunas et al., 2018; Rommelse et al., 2017; Vaidya et al., 2020).”
  • A set of potentially shared mechanisms across ADHD and ASD instantiate atypical executive functioning (EF).

    “A set of potentially shared mechanisms across ADHD and ASD instantiate atypical executive functioning (EF) (Karalunas et al., 2018).”
  • The deficits in working memory and processing speed also persisted when compared to an ADHD sample.

    “The deficits in working memory and processing speed also persisted when compared to an ADHD sample (Karalunas et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bishop DVM 2003 The Children's Communication Checklist, Second Edition (CCC-2) London The Psychological Corporation
  2. Conners CK 2008 The Conners 3rd Edition (Conners 3) North Tonawanda, NJ Multi-Health System
  3. Constantino JN Gruber CP 2012 The social responsiveness scale, Second Edition (SRS-2) Los Angeles, CA Western Psychological Services

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karalunas, S. L., Hawkey, E., Gustafsson, H., Miller, M., Langhorst, M., Cordova, M., Fair, D., & Nigg, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Karalunas, Sarah L.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
1705-1716
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2788653795
Cited by
148
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH096773, R00 MH091238, R01 MH086654, R37 MH059105 13, K23 MH108656)
  • Simons Foundation (177894)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, comorbidities, cognitive impairment, response variability, drift-diffusion model, drift rate, boundary separation, non-decision time, processing speed, working memory, response inhibition, reaction time
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review