Cited by 260Emotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Self-conscious emotions and depression: rumination explains why shame but not guilt is maladaptive

Open access
Orth, Ulrich, Berking, Matthias, Burkhardt, Simone·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Feelings of shame and guilt are factors associated with depression. However, studies simultaneously investigating shame and guilt suggest that only shame has a strong unique effect, although it is not yet clear which psychological processes cause shame and not shame-free guilt to be related to depression. The authors hypothesized that shame, in contrast to guilt, elicits rumination, which then leads to depression. Therefore, in this study we investigated event-related shame and guilt, eventrelated rumination, and depression among 149 mothers and fathers following family breakup due to marital separation. Data were analyzed using latent variable modeling. The results confirm that shame but not guilt has a strong unique effect on depression. Moreover, the results show that the effect of shame is substantially mediated by rumination. The results are discussed against the background of self-discrepancies and self-esteem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167206292958

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shame is associated with increased levels of rumination.

    “Shame is associated with increased levels of rumination (e.g., Orth et al., 2006)”

    From Is Shame Hallucinogenic? (2017) · cites this paper as Orth et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orth, U., Berking, M., & Burkhardt, S.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2006-12
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1608-1619
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2147082585
Cited by
259
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
shame, guilt, rumination, depression, self-conscious emotions, marital separation, family breakup, mediation, self-discrepancy, self-esteem, parents
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Attention, Depression, Divorce, Emotions, Family Relations, Fathers, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Mothers, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Shame

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review