Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progressive accumulation of amyloid‐ β oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease and in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice is accompanied by selective alterations in synaptic scaffold proteins

Pham, Emiley, Crews, Leslie, Ubhi, Kiren, Hansen, Lawrence, Adame, Anthony, Cartier, Anna, Salmon, David, Galasko, Douglas, Michael, Sarah, Savas, Jeffrey N., Yates, John R., Glabe, Charles, Masliah, Eliezer·2010·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

The cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease is closely associated with synaptic loss in the neocortex and limbic system. Although the neurotoxic effects of aggregated amyloid‐β oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease have been studied extensively in experimental models, less is known about the characteristics of these aggregates across the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease. In this study, postmortem frontal cortex samples from controls and patients with Alzheimer’s disease were fractionated and analyzed for levels of oligomers and synaptic proteins. We found that the levels of oligomers correlated with the severity of cognitive impairment (blessed information‐memory‐concentration score and mini‐mental state examination) and with the loss of synaptic markers. Reduced levels of the synaptic vesicle protein, vesicle‐associated membrane protein‐2, and the postsynaptic protein, postsynaptic density‐95, correlated with the levels of oligomers in the various fractions analyzed. The strongest associations were found with amyloid‐β dimers and pentamers. Co‐immunoprecipitation and double‐labeling experiments supported the possibility that amyloid‐β and postsynaptic density‐95 interact at synaptic sites. Similarly, in transgenic mice expressing high levels of neuronal amyloid precursor protein, amyloid‐β co‐immunoprecipitated with postsynaptic density‐95. This was accompanied by a decrease in the levels of the postsynaptic proteins Shank1 and Shank3 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and in the brains of amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. In conclusion, this study suggests that the presence of a subpopulation of amyloid‐β oligomers in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease might be related to alterations in selected synaptic proteins and cognitive impairment. Structured digital abstract MINT‐7894207 : Shank3 (uniprotkb: Q4ACU6 ), SAPAP1 (uniprotkb: Q9D415 ) and Shank1 (uni‐protkb: D3YZU4 ) colocalize ( MI:0403 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 ) MINT‐7894097 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P12023 ) and A‐beta (uniprotkb: P12023 ) physically interact ( MI:0915 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 ) MINT‐7894154 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P05067 ) physically interacts ( MI:0915 ) with PSD95 (uniprotkb: P78352 ) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation ( MI:0006 ) MINT‐7894167 , MINT‐7894178 , MINT‐7894397 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P12023 ) physically interacts ( MI:0915 ) with Psd95 (uniprotkb: Q62108 ) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation ( MI:0006 ) MINT‐7894283 : Psd95 (uniprotkb: Q62108 ) and Map2 (uniprotkb: P20357 ) colocalize ( MI:0403 ) by fluorescence microscopy ( MI:0416 ) MINT‐7894188 : SHANK3 (uniprotkb: Q9BYB0 ), SHANK1 (uniprotkb: Q9Y566 ) and SAPAP1 (uniprotkb: O14490 ) colocalize ( MI:0403 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 ) MINT‐7894080 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P05067 ) and A‐beta (uniprotkb: P05067 ) physically interact ( MI:0915 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 ) MINT‐7894116 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P05067 ) and Psd95 (uniprotkb: P78352 ) colocalize ( MI:0403 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 ) MINT‐7894126 : A‐beta (uniprotkb: P12023 ) and Psd95 (uniprotkb: Q62108 ) colocalize ( MI:0403 ) by cosedimentation in solution ( MI:0028 )

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07719.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1002/ana.410300410 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/ana.410270502 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1006/neur.1996.0056 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90093-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0197-4580(90)90746-M · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90008-A · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00050-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01749-5 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2174/0929866043407174 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/0-387-23226-5_8 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081142 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3109/13506129808995290 · DOI
  14. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103754 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63436-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0811698106 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.11.005 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jnr.22227 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.287.5456.1265 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90021-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.07.011 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80809-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00931.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5479-03.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/BF02982587 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.0900944106 · DOI
  27. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3034-05.2005 · DOI
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006011 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.06.003 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19980615)52:6<691::AID-JNR8>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  31. 10.1385/JMN:17:2:137 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90245-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.7569905 · DOI
  34. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02157.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53433-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80921-6 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/24790 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1242/jcs.113.11.1851 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02061-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1083/jcb.136.3.669 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80810-7 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80588-7 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0940-9602(01)80024-8 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.056 · DOI
  45. 10.1086/321293 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/jnr.1247 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6139-5_31 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05932.x · DOI
  50. 10.1172/JCI25410 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pham, E., Crews, L., Ubhi, K., Hansen, L., Adame, A., Cartier, A., Salmon, D., Galasko, D., Michael, S., Savas, J. N., Yates, J. R., Glabe, C., & Masliah, E.
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
277
Issue
14
Pages
3051-3067
ISSN
  • 1742-464X
  • 1742-4658
Cited by
206
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review