Cited by 52Physical Activity and HealthNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Acute high‐intensity football games can improve children"s inhibitory control and neurophysiological measures of attention

Open access
Lind, Rune Rasmussen, Beck, Mikkel Malling, Wikman, Johan, Malarski, Krzysztof, Krustrup, Peter, Lundbye‐Jensen, Jesper, Geertsen, Svend Sparre·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that a single bout of exercise can lead to transient performance improvements in specific cognitive domains in children. However, more knowledge is needed to determine the key exercise characteristics for obtaining these effects and how they translate into real-world settings. In the present study, we investigate how small-sided football games of either high- or moderate-intensity affect measures of inhibitory control in a school setting. Eighty-one children (mean age 11.8, 48 boys) were randomly allocated to three groups performing 20-minute of high-intensity small-sided real football games (SRF), moderate-intensity small-sided walking football games (SWF) or resting (RF). Behavioral measures of inhibitory control and neurophysiological measures of attention (P300 latency and amplitude) were obtained during a flanker task performed at baseline and 20 minutes following the intervention. Retention of declarative memory was assessed in a visual memory task 7 days after the intervention. Measures of inhibitory control improved more in children performing SRF compared to SWF 19 ms, 95% CI [7, 31 ms] (P = 0.041). This was paralleled by larger increases in P300 amplitudes at Fz in children performing SRF compared both to RF in congruent (3.54 μV, 95% CI [0.85, 6.23 μV], P = 0.039) and incongruent trials (5.56 μV, 95% CI [2.87, 8.25 μV], P < 0.001) and compared to SWF in incongruent trials (4.10 μV, 95% CI [1.41, 6.68 μV], P = 0.010). No effects were found in measures of declarative memory. Together this indicates that acute high-intensity small-sided football games can transiently improve measures of inhibitory control and neurophysiological correlates of attention. Intense small-sided football games are easily implementable and can be employed by practitioners, for example, during breaks throughout the school day.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.13485

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical activity interventions, including those of moderate to vigorous intensity, improve brain structure and function as well as cognitive and academic performance.

    “There is evidence that physical activity interventions, including those of moderate to vigorous intensity, improve brain structure and function as well as cognitive and academic performance.75–79”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Rheinberg F, Vollmeyer R, Engeser S. Die Erfassung des Flow‐Erlebens In: Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Rheinberg F, eds. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selstkonzept. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2003: 261‐ 279.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lind, R. R., Beck, M. M., Wikman, J., Malarski, K., Krustrup, P., Lundbye‐Jensen, J., & Geertsen, S. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Halmstad University (SE)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Lind, Rune Rasmussen
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-24
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1546-1562
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W2945293165
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Nordea-fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
acute exercise, high-intensity exercise, children, inhibitory control, P300, attention, flanker task, declarative memory, school holidays, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child Behavior, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Soccer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review